Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Davies

dblp:16/2747 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 75% Graph data management · 25%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
anomaly detection
0.212015
Graph Analysis for Detecting Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Healthcare Data · AAAI 2015
Data mining › anomaly detection
fraud detection
0.212015
Graph Analysis for Detecting Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Healthcare Data · AAAI 2015
Graph data management
graph analytics
0.212015
Graph Analysis for Detecting Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Healthcare Data · AAAI 2015
Data mining › network analysis
heterogeneous information network analysis
0.212015
Graph Analysis for Detecting Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Healthcare Data · AAAI 2015
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › fault-tolerant architecture
fault-tolerant clock
0.021978
Reliable Synchronization of Redundant Systems · ISCA 1978
Synchronization and Matching in Redundant Systems · IEEE Trans. Computers 1978
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › redundancy
redundant systems
0.011978
Reliable Synchronization of Redundant Systems · ISCA 1978
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › redundancy › modular redundancy
triple modular redundancy
0.011978
Reliable Synchronization of Redundant Systems · ISCA 1978
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.011978
Reliable Synchronization of Redundant Systems · ISCA 1978
Distributed systems
replication
0.011978
Reliable Synchronization of Redundant Systems · ISCA 1978

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph analysis · 0.4mutual feedback synchronization · 0.0formal specification · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Network Explorer: Design, Implementation, and Real World Deployment of a Large Network Visualization Tool
abstract
This paper describes the process of design, implementation, and real world deployment of a web-based network exploration tool called Network Explorer. We designed Network Explorer based on the expressed needs of our clients and later deployed it as part of a larger system for fraud detection in health care. Our implementation of Network Explorer provides visual interactive access to large-scale network data. As part of the Network Explorer tool we contribute a dynamic group-in-a-box implementation for laying out clusters, and a node navigator widget that aids in the exploration of large networks. We are also contributing two open source components of the Network Explorer for the community to reuse: an in-browser clustering library, and the dynamic group-in-a-box algorithm. We have evaluated the network explorer tool in multiple real-world environments including the fraud detection setting above.
John Alexis Guerra Gómez, Daniel Davies, Peter Jarvis, Eric Bier
AVI4
2015 Graph Analysis for Detecting Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Healthcare Data
abstract
Detection of fraud, waste, and abuse (FWA) is an important yet difficult problem. In this paper, we describe a system to detect suspicious activities in large healthcare claims datasets. Each healthcare dataset is viewed as a heterogeneous network of patients, doctors, pharmacies, and other entities. These networks can be large, with millions of patients, hundreds of thousands of doctors, and tens of thousands of pharmacies, for example. Graph analysis techniques are developed to find suspicious individuals, suspicious relationships between individuals, unusual changes over time, unusual geospatial dispersion, and anomalous networks within the overall graph structure. The system has been deployed on multiple sites and data sets, both government and commercial, to facilitate the work of FWA investigation analysts.
Eric Bier, Tomonori Honda 0001, Kumar Sricharan, Leilani H. Gilpin, John Alexis Guerra Gómez, Daniel Davies
AAAI8
1978 Reliable Synchronization of Redundant Systems
abstract
This paper is concerned with the problem of reliably maintaining synchronization in redundant systems. While many such systems have been built, little work has been done on formalizing their requirements. The terms necessary to quantify the problem and general synchronizer specifications are given. To illustrate their use and point out issues in synchronization, a synchronizer is advanced and three detailed examples of its use are given. These are a single fault tolerant clock and a TMR microcomputer system synchronized first predominately with hardware, then with software.
Daniel Davies
ISCA1
1978 Synchronization and Matching in Redundant Systems
abstract
Most of the published work on massive redundancy makes one crucial assumption: the redundant modules are synchronized. There are three ways of achieving synchronization in redundant systems-independent accurate clocks, a common external reference, and mutual feedback. The use of a common external reference is currently the most widely used technique, but suffers from vulnerability to common-point failures. We introduce a novel mutual feedback technique, called "synchronization voting," that does not have this drawback. A practical application of synchronization voting is described in the appendix—a fault-tolerant crystal-controlled clock.
Daniel Davies, John F. Wakerly
IEEE Trans. Computers1