Programming instructors often conduct collaborative learning activities, such as Peer Instruction (PI), to enhance student motivation, engagement, and learning gains. However, the impact of group discussion and formation mechanisms on student performance remains unclear. To investigate this, we conducted an 11- session experiment in a large, in-person CS1 course. We employed both random and expertise-balanced grouping methods to examine the efficacy of different group mechanisms and the impact of expert students’ presence on collaborative learning. Our observations revealed complex dynamics within the collaborative learning environment. Among 255 groups, 146 actively engaged in discussions, with 96 of these groups demonstrating improvement for poor-performing students. Interestingly, our analysis revealed that different grouping methods (expertise-balanced or random) did not significantly influence discussion engagement or poor-performing students’ improvement. In our deeper qualitative analysis, we found that struggling students often derived benefits from interactions with expert peers, but this positive effect was not consistent across all groups.We identified challenges that expert students face in peer instruction interactions, highlighting the complexity of leveraging expertise within group discussions.

Facilitating class-wide debriefings after small-group discussions is a common strategy in ethics education. Instructor interviews revealed that effective debriefings should highlight frequently discussed themes and surface underrepresented viewpoints, making accurate representations of insight occurrence essential. Yet authoring presentations in real time is cognitively overwhelming due to the volume of data and tight time constraints. We present Dynamite, an AI-assisted system that enables semantic updates to instructor-authored slides during live classroom discussions. These updates are powered by semantic data binding, which links slide content to evolving discussion data, and semantic suggestions, which offer revision options aligned with pedagogical goals. In a within-subject in-lab study with 12 participants, Dynamite outperformed a text-based AI baseline in content accuracy and quality. Participants used voice and sketch input to quickly organize semantic blocks, then applied suggestions to accelerate refinement as data stabilized.

Programming instructors often conduct collaborative learning activities, like Peer Instruction, to foster a deeper understanding in students and enhance their engagement with learning. These activities, however, may not always yield productive outcomes due to the diversity of student mental models and their ineffective collaboration. In this work, we introduce VizGroup, an AI-assisted system that enables programming instructors to easily oversee students’ real-time collaborative learning behaviors during large programming courses. VizGroup leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to recommend event specifications for instructors so that they can simultaneously track and receive alerts about key correlation patterns between various collaboration metrics and ongoing coding tasks. We evaluated VizGroup with 12 instructors in a comparison study using a dataset collected from a Peer Instruction activity that was conducted in a large programming lecture. The results showed that VizGroup helped instructors effectively overview, narrow down, and track nuances throughout students’ behaviors.