I. Dan Melamed

dblp:16/35 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
19ranked-venue papers
12as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 18 · 12 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Machine translation · 63% Information extraction and text analysis · 16% Optimization for machine learning · 12%
Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Automata and formal languages · 100%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation
0.232009
Accuracy-Based Scoring for DOT: Towards Direct Error Minimization for Data-Oriented Translation · EMNLP 2009
Statistical Machine Translation by Parsing · ACL 2004
A Word-to-Word Model of Translational Equivalence · ACL 1997
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.122006
Scalable Discriminative Learning for Natural Language Parsing and Translation · NIPS 2006
Statistical Machine Translation by Parsing · ACL 2004
Automata and formal languages
parsing
0.122006
Advances in Discriminative Parsing · ACL 2006
Generalized Multitext Grammars · ACL 2004
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › training criteria
minimum error rate training
0.112009
Accuracy-Based Scoring for DOT: Towards Direct Error Minimization for Data-Oriented Translation · EMNLP 2009
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
translational equivalence
0.122006
Empirical Lower Bounds on the Complexity of Translational Equivalence · ACL 2006
A Word-to-Word Model of Translational Equivalence · ACL 1997
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › acoustic model training
discriminative training
0.112006
Scalable Discriminative Learning for Natural Language Parsing and Translation · NIPS 2006
Automata and formal languages › parsing
constituency parsing
0.112006
Advances in Discriminative Parsing · ACL 2006
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
synchronous grammar
0.012004
Statistical Machine Translation by Parsing · ACL 2004
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
syntax-aware translation
0.012004
Statistical Machine Translation by Parsing · ACL 2004
Automata and formal languages
grammar formalisms
0.012004
Generalized Multitext Grammars · ACL 2004
Automata and formal languages › grammar formalisms
linear context-free rewriting systems
0.012004
Generalized Multitext Grammars · ACL 2004
Automata and formal languages › formal grammars
synchronous grammars
0.012004
Generalized Multitext Grammars · ACL 2004
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › parallel corpora
sentence alignment
0.021997
A Portable Algorithm for Mapping Bitext Correspondence · ACL 1997
A Geometric Approach to Mapping Bitext Correspondence · EMNLP 1996
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › phrase extraction
multiword expression identification
0.011997
Automatic Discovery of Non-Compositional Compounds in Parallel Data · EMNLP 1997
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
word alignment
0.011997
A Word-to-Word Model of Translational Equivalence · ACL 1997
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
parallel corpora
0.011997
Automatic Discovery of Non-Compositional Compounds in Parallel Data · EMNLP 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

feature selection · 0.1empirical complexity analysis · 0.1accuracy-based scoring · 0.1discriminative training · 0.1discriminative learning · 0.1syntactic parsing · 0.0synchronous parsing · 0.0chomsky normal form generalization · 0.0threshold-based precision/recall control · 0.0statistical association measures · 0.0smooth injective map recognizer · 0.0expectation-maximization · 0.0geometric mapping · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Forms2Dialog: Automatic dialog generation for Web tasks
abstract
Today, many common tasks (e.g. booking flights, ordering food) can be done by filling out web forms. Automatic processing of Web forms to support interactive speech input is useful for numerous reasons, including ease of use for mobile device users and accessibility for people with visual or print disabilities. In this paper, we propose an automated method to process web forms and convert them into dialog flows for spoken interaction. First we identify relevant information for each form element (including element type, label, values and help messages) and key relationships between form elements (including ordering and dependencies). We then generate two types of dialog flow for each Web form. Experimental results show that the method generates efficient and informative dialog flows for web tasks, a key step for building virtual assistants. An Android application has been realized as a use case of the generated dialog flows.
Nobal B. Niraula, Amanda Stent, Hyuckchul Jung, Giuseppe Di Fabbrizio, I. Dan Melamed, Vasile Rus
SLT5
2011 Crowd-sourcing for difficult transcription of speech
abstract
Crowd-sourcing is a promising method for fast and cheap transcription of large volumes of speech data. However, this method cannot achieve the accuracy of expert transcribers on speech that is difficult to transcribe. Faced with such speech data, we developed three new methods of crowd-sourcing, which allow explicit trade-offs among precision, recall, and cost. The methods are: incremental redundancy, treating ASR as a transcriber, and using a regression model to predict transcription reliability. Even though the accuracy of individual crowd-workers is only 55% on our data, our best method achieves 90% accuracy on 93% of the utterances, using only 1.3 crowd-worker transcriptions per utterance on average. When forced to transcribe all utterances, our best method matches the accuracy of previous crowd-sourcing methods using only one third as many transcriptions. We also study the effects of various task design factors on transcription latency and accuracy, some of which have not been reported before.
Jason D. Williams, I. Dan Melamed, Tirso Alonso, Barbara Hollister, Jay G. Wilpon
ASRU2
2009 Accuracy-Based Scoring for DOT: Towards Direct Error Minimization for Data-Oriented Translation
Daniel Galron, Sergio Penkale, Andy Way, I. Dan Melamed
EMNLP4
2009 Automatic detection of audio advertisements
I. Dan Melamed, Yeon-Jun Kim
INTERSPEECH1
2006 Advances in Discriminative Parsing
abstract
The present work advances the accuracy and training speed of discriminative parsing. Our discriminative parsing method has no generative component, yet surpasses a generative baseline on constituent parsing, and does so with minimal linguistic cleverness. Our model can incorporate arbitrary features of the input and parse state, and performs feature selection incrementally over an exponential feature space during training. We demonstrate the flexibility of our approach by testing it with several parsing strategies and various feature sets. Our implementation is freely available at: http://nlp.cs.nyu.edu/parser/.
Joseph P. Turian, I. Dan Melamed
ACL2
2006 Empirical Lower Bounds on the Complexity of Translational Equivalence
abstract
This paper describes a study of the patterns of translational equivalence exhibited by a variety of bitexts. The study found that the complexity of these patterns in every bitext was higher than suggested in the literature. These findings shed new light on why "syntactic" constraints have not helped to improve statistical translation models, including finite-state phrase-based models, tree-to-string models, and tree-to-tree models. The paper also presents evidence that inversion transduction grammars cannot generate some translational equivalence relations, even in relatively simple real bitexts in syntactically similar languages with rigid word order. Instructions for replicating our experiments are at http://nip.cs.nyu.edu/GenPar/ACL06
Benjamin Wellington, Sonjia Waxmonsky, I. Dan Melamed
ACL3
2006 Scalable Discriminative Learning for Natural Language Parsing and Translation
abstract
Parsing and translating natural languages can be viewed as problems of predicting tree structures. For machine learning approaches to these predictions, the diversity and high dimensionality of the structures involved mandate very large training sets. This paper presents a purely discriminative learning method that scales up well to problems of this size. Its accuracy was at least as good as other comparable methods on a standard parsing task. To our knowledge, it is the first purely discriminative learning algorithm for translation with treestructured models. Unlike other popular methods, this method does not require a great deal of feature engineering a priori, because it performs feature selection over a compound feature space as it learns. Experiments demonstrate the method's versatility, accuracy, and efficiency. Relevant software is freely available at http://nlp.cs.nyu.edu/parser and http://nlp.cs.nyu.edu/GenPar.
Joseph P. Turian, Benjamin Wellington, I. Dan Melamed
NIPS3
2004 Statistical Machine Translation by Parsing
abstract
In an ordinary syntactic parser, the input is a string, and the grammar ranges over strings. This paper explores generalizations of ordinary parsing algorithms that allow the input to consist of string tuples and/or the grammar to range over string tuples. Such algorithms can infer the synchronous structures hidden in parallel texts. It turns out that these generalized parsers can do most of the work required to train and apply a syntax-aware statistical machine translation system.
I. Dan Melamed
ACL1
2004 Generalized Multitext Grammars
abstract
Generalized Multitext Grammar (GMTG) is a synchronous grammar formalism that is weakly equivalent to Linear Context-Free Rewriting Systems (LCFRS), but retains much of the notational and intuitive simplicity of Context-Free Grammar (CFG). GMTG allows both synchronous and independent rewriting. Such flexibility facilitates more perspicuous modeling of parallel text than what is possible with other synchronous formalisms. This paper investigates the generative capacity of GMTG, proves that each component grammar of a GMTG retains its generative power, and proposes a generalization of Chomsky Normal Form, which is necessary for synchronous CKY-style parsing.
I. Dan Melamed, Giorgio Satta, Benjamin Wellington
ACL1
2003 Evaluation of machine translation and its evaluation
abstract
Evaluation of MT evaluation measures is limited by inconsistent human judgment data. Nonetheless, machine translation can be evaluated using the well-known measures precision, recall, and their average, the F-measure. The unigram-based F-measure has significantly higher correlation with human judgments than recently proposed alternatives. More importantly, this standard measure has an intuitive graphical interpretation, which can facilitate insight into how MT systems might be improved. The relevant software is publicly available from http://nlp.cs.nyu.edu/GTM/.
Joseph P. Turian, Luke Shen, I. Dan Melamed
MTSummit3
2003 Multitext Grammars and Synchronous Parsers
I. Dan Melamed
HLT-NAACL1
2003 Precision and Recall of Machine Translation
I. Dan Melamed, Ryan Green, Joseph P. Turian
HLT-NAACL1
2000 Models of Translational Equivalence among Words
abstract
Parallel texts (bitexts) have properties that distinguish them from other kinds of parallel data. First, most words translate to only one other word. Second, bitext correspondence is typically only partial—many words in each text have no clear equivalent in the other text. This article presents methods for biasing statistical translation models to reflect these properties. Evaluation with respect to independent human judgments has confirmed that translation models biased in this fashion are significantly more accurate than a baseline knowledge-free model. This article also shows how a statistical translation model can take advantage of preexisting knowledge that might be available about particular language pairs. Even the simplest kinds of language-specific knowledge, such as the distinction between content words and function words, are shown to reliably boost translation model performance on some tasks. Statistical models that reflect knowledge about the model domain combine the best of both the rationalist and empiricist paradigms.
I. Dan Melamed
Comput. Linguistics1
1999 Bitext Maps and Alignment via Pattern Recognition
I. Dan Melamed
Comput. Linguistics1
1997 A Portable Algorithm for Mapping Bitext Correspondence
abstract
The first step in most empirical work in multilingual NLP is to construct maps of the correspondence between texts and their translations (bitext maps). The Smooth Injective Map Recognizer (SIMR) algorithm presented here is a generic pattern recognition algorithm that is particularly well-suited to mapping bitext correspondence. SIMR is faster and significantly more accurate than other algorithms in the literature. The algorithm is robust enough to use on noisy texts, such as those resulting from OCR input, and on translations that are not very literal. SIMR encapsulates its language-specific heuristics, so that it can be ported to any language pair with a minimal effort.
I. Dan Melamed
ACL1
1997 A Word-to-Word Model of Translational Equivalence
abstract
Many multilingual NLP applications need to translate words between different languages, but cannot afford the computational expenses of inducing or applying a full translation model. For theses applications, we have designed a fast algorithm for estimating a partial translation model, which accounts for translational equivalence only at the word level. The model's precision/recall trade-off can be directly controlled via one threshold parameter. This feature makes the model more suitable for applications that are not fully statistical. The model's hidden parameters can be easily conditioned on information extrinsic to the model, providing an easy way to integrate pre-existing knowledge such as part-of-speech, dictionaries, word order, etc., Our model can link word tokens in parallel texts as well as other translation models in the literature. Unlike other translation models, it can automatically produce dictionary-sized translation lexicons, and it can do so with over 99% accuracy.
I. Dan Melamed
ACL1
1997 Automatic Discovery of Non-Compositional Compounds in Parallel Data
I. Dan Melamed
EMNLP1
1996 Automatic Detection of Omissions in Translations
I. Dan Melamed
COLING1
1996 A Geometric Approach to Mapping Bitext Correspondence
I. Dan Melamed
EMNLP1