VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
A. Moorthy
dblp:16/440
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Operating systems · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Operating systems › resource management › process management › CPU scheduling
proportional share scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Proportional Share Scheduling of Operating System Services for Real-Time Applications · RTSS 1998 |
Operating systems › real-time systems
real-time operating systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Proportional Share Scheduling of Operating System Services for Real-Time Applications · RTSS 1998 |
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Proportional Share Scheduling of Operating System Services for Real-Time Applications · RTSS 1998 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
proportional share scheduling · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | Proportional Share Scheduling of Operating System Services for Real-Time ApplicationsabstractWhile there is currently great interest in the problem of providing real time services in general purpose operating systems, the issue of real time scheduling of internal operating system activities has received relatively little attention. Without such real time scheduling, the system is susceptible to conditions such as receive livelock-a situation in which an operating system spends all its time processing arriving network packets, and application processes, even if scheduled with a real time scheduler, are starved. We investigate the problem of scheduling operating system activities such as network protocol processing in a proportional share manner. We describe a proportional share implementation of the FreeBSD operating system and demonstrate that it solves the receive livelock problem. Packets are processed within the operating system only at the cumulative rate at which the destination applications are prepared to receive them. If packets arrive at a faster rate then they are discarded after consuming minimal system resources. In this manner the performance of "well behaved" applications is unaffected by "misbehaving" applications. We demonstrate this effect by running a set of multimedia applications under a variety of network conditions on a set of increasingly sophisticated proportional share implementations of FreeBSD and comparing their performance. This work contributes to our knowledge of the engineering of proportional share real time systems. Kevin Jeffay, F. Donelson Smith, A. Moorthy, James H. Anderson |
RTSS | 3 |