VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ahmet N. Parlakbilek
dblp:16/5926
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › hardware simulation
compiled simulation |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | A multiple-strength multiple-delay compiled-code logic simulator · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1993 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | A multiple-strength multiple-delay compiled-code logic simulator · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1993 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
logic simulation |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | A multiple-strength multiple-delay compiled-code logic simulator · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1993 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
table lookup · 0.0powerset representation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | A multiple-strength multiple-delay compiled-code logic simulatorabstractDescribes a new logic state model for gate level simulation based upon a powerset representation of the possible drive states at the output of a logic gate. Efficient implementation techniques for this model in a compiled-code logic simulator are presented, with the results that most complicated operations can be optimized into simple table lookups. Algorithmic issues in a multiple-strength multiple-delay logic simulator are discussed. Implementation results show that for typical circuits, compiled-code implementations of multiple-strength unit-delay logic simulation and multiple-strength multiple-delay logic simulation are slightly lower than three-state unit-delay simulation, and achieve speedups of 5 to 14 times compared to interpretive versions of the same algorithms.> Ahmet N. Parlakbilek, David M. Lewis |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 1 |