Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

E. Jokipii

dblp:16/6487 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › block cipher
block cipher modes
0.011997
A Concrete Security Treatment of Symmetric Encryption · FOCS 1997
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › cryptographic foundations › cryptographic models
chosen-plaintext attack
0.011997
A Concrete Security Treatment of Symmetric Encryption · FOCS 1997
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › provable security
concrete security
0.011997
A Concrete Security Treatment of Symmetric Encryption · FOCS 1997
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
symmetric cryptography
0.011997
A Concrete Security Treatment of Symmetric Encryption · FOCS 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reduction · 0.0concrete complexity analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 A Concrete Security Treatment of Symmetric Encryption
abstract
We study notions and schemes for symmetric (ie. private key) encryption in a concrete security framework. We give four different notions of security against chosen plaintext attack and analyze the concrete complexity of reductions among them, providing both upper and lower bounds, and obtaining tight relations. In this way we classify notions (even though polynomially reducible to each other) as stronger or weaker in terms of concrete security. Next we provide concrete security analyses of methods to encrypt using a block cipher, including the most popular encryption method, CBC. We establish tight bounds (meaning matching upper bounds and attacks) on the success of adversaries as a function of their resources.
Mihir Bellare, Anand Desai, E. Jokipii, Phillip Rogaway
FOCS3