Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Canasai Kruengkrai

dblp:16/6986 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
24ranked-venue papers
13as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-5124-2822ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 23 · 13 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
12 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 35% Language models and text generation · 22% Question answering and dialogue systems · 11%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 96% Data mining · 4%

Topics — the 29 heaviest of 30, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
why-question answering
1.032019
Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019
Semi-Distantly Supervised Neural Model for Generating Compact Answers to Open-Domain Why Questions · AAAI 2018
Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Networks with Causality-Attention for Why-Question Answering · WSDM 2017
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
learning from failure
0.912025
Teaching Text Agents to Learn Sequential Decision Making from Failure · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
abstractive summarization
0.722019
Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019
Semi-Distantly Supervised Neural Model for Generating Compact Answers to Open-Domain Why Questions · AAAI 2018
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization
0.722019
Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019
Semi-Distantly Supervised Neural Model for Generating Compact Answers to Open-Domain Why Questions · AAAI 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation
0.412020
DAGA: Data Augmentation with a Generation Approach forLow-resource Tagging Tasks · EMNLP (1) 2020
Machine learning › Generative modeling › synthetic data generation
image generation for data augmentation
0.412020
DAGA: Data Augmentation with a Generation Approach forLow-resource Tagging Tasks · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › named entity recognition
low-resource named entity recognition
0.412020
Improving Low-Resource Named Entity Recognition using Joint Sentence and Token Labeling · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling › part-of-speech tagging
low-resource POS tagging
0.412020
DAGA: Data Augmentation with a Generation Approach forLow-resource Tagging Tasks · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition
0.412020
Improving Low-Resource Named Entity Recognition using Joint Sentence and Token Labeling · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sequence labeling
0.412020
DAGA: Data Augmentation with a Generation Approach forLow-resource Tagging Tasks · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction › event relation extraction
causal relation extraction
0.422019
Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Networks with Causality-Attention for Why-Question Answering · WSDM 2017
Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.412019
Better Exploiting Latent Variables in Text Modeling · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › controllable text generation
text style transfer
0.412019
Learning to Flip the Sentiment of Reviews from Non-Parallel Corpora · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.412019
Better Exploiting Latent Variables in Text Modeling · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › event analysis › event causality identification
causality detection
0.312017
Improving Event Causality Recognition with Multiple Background Knowledge Sources Using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Networks · AAAI 2017
Information retrieval › document retrieval › passage retrieval
answer passage retrieval
0.312017
Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Networks with Causality-Attention for Why-Question Answering · WSDM 2017
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
coreference resolution
0.212016
Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Network · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › coreference resolution › anaphora resolution
zero anaphora resolution
0.212016
Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Network · EMNLP 2016
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network
0.222017
Improving Event Causality Recognition with Multiple Background Knowledge Sources Using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Networks · AAAI 2017
Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Network · EMNLP 2016
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network › convolutional neural network architecture
multi-column convolutional neural network
0.222017
Improving Event Causality Recognition with Multiple Background Knowledge Sources Using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Networks · AAAI 2017
Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Network · EMNLP 2016
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning
0.112019
Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
non-parallel corpora
0.112019
Learning to Flip the Sentiment of Reviews from Non-Parallel Corpora · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › word segmentation
chinese word segmentation
0.112009
An Error-Driven Word-Character Hybrid Model for Joint Chinese Word Segmentation and POS Tagging · ACL/IJCNLP 2009
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging
0.112009
An Error-Driven Word-Character Hybrid Model for Joint Chinese Word Segmentation and POS Tagging · ACL/IJCNLP 2009
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis › discourse processing
centering theory
0.112016
Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Network · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
discourse analysis
0.112016
Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Network · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.012002
A parallel learning algorithm for text classification · KDD 2002
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing
parallel machine learning
0.012002
A parallel learning algorithm for text classification · KDD 2002
Data mining
semi-supervised learning
0.012002
A parallel learning algorithm for text classification · KDD 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

convolutional neural network · 1.0perturbation method · 0.9failed action-aware objective · 0.9multi-column convolutional neural network · 0.5self-attention · 0.4language model fine-tuning · 0.4generation-based augmentation · 0.4BiLSTM-CRF · 0.4recurrent neural network · 0.4encoder-decoder · 0.4attention mechanism · 0.3parallel learning · 0.1naive bayes · 0.1expectation-maximization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Teaching Text Agents to Learn Sequential Decision Making from Failure
abstract
Text-based reinforcement-learning agents improve their policies by interacting with their environments to collect more training data.However, these self-collected data inevitably contain intermediate failed actions caused by attempting physically infeasible behaviors and/or hallucinations.Directly learning a policy from such trajectories can reinforce incorrect behaviors and reduce task success rates.In this paper, we propose a failed action-aware objective that suppresses the negative impact of failed actions during training by assigning zero return based on textual feedback.Building on this objective, we introduce a perturbation method that leverages unsuccessful trajectories to construct new successful ones that share the same goal.This allows agents to benefit from diverse experiences without further interaction with the environment.Experiments in ALFWorld and ScienceWorld demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms strong baselines and generalizes across environments.
Canasai Kruengkrai, Koichiro Yoshino
ACL (1)1
2025 Training Dialogue Systems by AI Feedback for Improving Overall Dialogue Impression
abstract
To improve user engagement during conversations with dialogue systems, we must improve individual dialogue responses and dialogue impressions such as consistency, personality, and empathy throughout the entire dialogue. While such dialogue systems have been developing rapidly with the help of large language models (LLMs), reinforcement learning from AI feedback (RLAIF) has attracted attention to align LLM-based dialogue models for such dialogue impressions. In RLAIF, a reward model based on another LLM is used to create a training signal for an LLM-based dialogue model using zero-shot/few-shot prompting techniques. However, evaluating an entire dialogue only by prompting LLMs is challenging. In this study, the supervised fine-tuning (SFT) of LLMs prepared reward models corresponding to 12 metrics related to the impression of the entire dialogue for evaluating dialogue responses. We tuned our dialogue models using the reward model signals as feedback to improve the impression of the system. The results of automatic and human evaluations showed that tuning the dialogue model using our reward model corresponding to dialogue impression improved the evaluation of individual metrics and the naturalness of the dialogue response.
Kai Yoshida, Masahiro Mizukami, Seiya Kawano, Canasai Kruengkrai, Hiroaki Sugiyama, Koichiro Yoshino
ICASSP4
2024 Bridging Textual and Tabular Worlds for Fact Verification: A Lightweight, Attention-Based Model
abstract
FEVEROUS is a benchmark and research initiative focused on fact extraction and verification tasks involving unstructured text and structured tabular data. In FEVEROUS, existing works often rely on extensive preprocessing and utilize rule-based transformations of data, leading to potential context loss or misleading encodings. This paper introduces a simple yet powerful model that nullifies the need for modality conversion, thereby preserving the original evidence’s context. By leveraging pre-trained models on diverse text and tabular datasets and by incorporating a lightweight attention-based mechanism, our approach efficiently exploits latent connections between different data types, thereby yielding comprehensive and reliable verdict predictions. The model’s modular structure adeptly manages multi-modal information, ensuring the integrity and authenticity of the original evidence are uncompromised. Comparative analyses reveal that our approach exhibits competitive performance, aligning itself closely with top-tier models on the FEVEROUS benchmark.
Shirin Dabbaghi Varnosfaderani, Canasai Kruengkrai, Ramin Yahyapour, Junichi Yamagishi
LREC/COLING2
2022 Mitigating the Diminishing Effect of Elastic Weight Consolidation
abstract
Elastic weight consolidation (EWC, Kirkpatrick et al. 2017) is a promising approach to addressing catastrophic forgetting in sequential training. We find that the effect of EWC can diminish when fine-tuning large-scale pre-trained language models on different datasets. We present two simple objective functions to mitigate this problem by rescaling the components of EWC. Experiments on natural language inference and fact-checking tasks indicate that our methods require much smaller values for the trade-off parameters to achieve results comparable to EWC.
Canasai Kruengkrai, Junichi Yamagishi
COLING1
2020 Improving Low-Resource Named Entity Recognition using Joint Sentence and Token Labeling
abstract
Exploiting sentence-level labels, which are easy to obtain, is one of the plausible methods to improve low-resource named entity recognition (NER), where token-level labels are costly to annotate.Current models for jointly learning sentence and token labeling are limited to binary classification.We present a joint model that supports multi-class classification and introduce a simple variant of self-attention that allows the model to learn scaling factors.Our model produces 3.78%, 4.20%, 2.08% improvements in F1 over the BiLSTM-CRF baseline on e-commerce product titles in three different low-resource languages: Vietnamese, Thai, and Indonesian, respectively.
Canasai Kruengkrai, Thien Hai Nguyen, Sharifah Mahani Aljunied, Lidong Bing
ACL1
2020 DAGA: Data Augmentation with a Generation Approach forLow-resource Tagging Tasks
abstract
Bosheng Ding, Linlin Liu, Lidong Bing, Canasai Kruengkrai, Thien Hai Nguyen, Shafiq Joty, Luo Si, Chunyan Miao. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2020.
Bosheng Ding, Lidong Bing, Canasai Kruengkrai, Thien Hai Nguyen, Shafiq R. Joty, Luo Si, Chunyan Miao
EMNLP (1)4
2019 Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions
abstract
This paper proposes a novel method for generating compact answers to open-domain why-questions, such as the following answer, “Because deep learning technologies were introduced,” to the question, “Why did Google’s machine translation service improve so drastically?” Although many works have dealt with why-question answering, most have focused on retrieving as answers relatively long text passages that consist of several sentences. Because of their length, such passages are not appropriate to be read aloud by spoken dialog systems and smart speakers; hence, we need to create a method that generates compact answers. We developed a novel neural summarizer for this compact answer generation task. It combines a recurrent neural network-based encoderdecoder model with stacked convolutional neural networks and was designed to effectively exploit background knowledge, in this case a set of causal relations (e.g., “[Microsoft’s machine translation has made great progress over the last few years]effect since [it started to use deep learning.]cause”) that was extracted from a large web data archive (4 billion web pages). Our experimental results show that our method achieved significantly better ROUGE F-scores than existing encoder-decoder models and their variations that were augmented with query-attention and memory networks, which are used to exploit the background knowledge.
Ryu Iida, Canasai Kruengkrai, Ryo Ishida, Kentaro Torisawa, Jong-Hoon Oh, Julien Kloetzer
AAAI2
2019 Better Exploiting Latent Variables in Text Modeling
abstract
We show that sampling latent variables multiple times at a gradient step helps in improving a variational autoencoder and propose a simple and effective method to better exploit these latent variables through hidden state averaging.Consistent gains in performance on two different datasets, Penn Treebank and Yahoo, indicate the generalizability of our method.1
Canasai Kruengkrai
ACL (1)1
2019 Learning to Flip the Sentiment of Reviews from Non-Parallel Corpora
abstract
Canasai Kruengkrai. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019.
Canasai Kruengkrai
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1)1
2018 Semi-Distantly Supervised Neural Model for Generating Compact Answers to Open-Domain Why Questions
abstract
This paper proposes a neural network-based method for generating compact answers to open-domain why-questions (e.g., "Why was Mr. Trump elected as the president of the US?"). Unlike factoid question answering methods that provide short text spans as answers, existing work for why-question answering have aimed at answering questions by retrieving relatively long text passages, each of which often consists of several sentences, from a text archive. While the actual answer to a why-question may be expressed over several consecutive sentences, these often contain redundant and/or unrelated parts. Such answers would not be suitable for spoken dialog systems and smart speakers such as Amazon Echo, which receive much attention in these days. In this work, we aim at generating non-redundant compact answers to why-questions from answer passages retrieved from a very large web data corpora (4 billion web pages) by an already existing open-domain why-question answering system, using a novel neural network obtained by extending existing summarization methods. We also automatically generate training data using a large number of causal relations automatically extracted from 4 billion web pages by an existing supervised causality recognizer. The data is used to train our neural network, together with manually created training data. Through a series of experiments, we show that both our novel neural network and auto-generated training data improve the quality of the generated answers both in ROUGE score and in a subjective evaluation.
Ryo Ishida, Kentaro Torisawa, Jong-Hoon Oh, Ryu Iida, Canasai Kruengkrai, Julien Kloetzer
AAAI5
2017 Improving Event Causality Recognition with Multiple Background Knowledge Sources Using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Networks
abstract
We propose a method for recognizing such event causalities as "smoke cigarettes" → "die of lung cancer" using background knowledge taken from web texts as well as original sentences from which candidates for the causalities were extracted. We retrieve texts related to our event causality candidates from four billion web pages by three distinct methods, including a why-question answering system, and feed them to our multi-column convolutional neural networks. This allows us to identify the useful background knowledge scattered in web texts and effectively exploit the identified knowledge to recognize event causalities. We empirically show that the combination of our neural network architecture and background knowledge significantly improves average precision, while the previous state-of-the-art method gains just a small benefit from such background knowledge.
Canasai Kruengkrai, Kentaro Torisawa, Chikara Hashimoto, Julien Kloetzer, Jong-Hoon Oh, Masahiro Tanaka
AAAI1
2017 Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Networks with Causality-Attention for Why-Question Answering
abstract
Why-question answering (why-QA) is a task to retrieve answers (or answer passages) to why-questions (e.g., "why are tsunamis generated?") from a text archive. Several previously proposed methods for why-QA improved their performance by automatically recognizing causalities that are expressed with such explicit cues as "because" in answer passages and using the recognized causalities as a clue for finding proper answers. However, in answer passages, causalities might be implicitly expressed, (i.e., without any explicit cues): "An earthquake suddenly displaced sea water and a tsunami was generated." The previous works did not deal with such implicitly expressed causalities and failed to find proper answers that included the causalities. We improve why-QA based on the following two ideas. First, implicitly expressed causalities in one text might be expressed in other texts with explicit cues. If we can automatically recognize such explicitly expressed causalities from a text archive and use them to complement the implicitly expressed causalities in an answer passage, we can improve why-QA. Second, the causes of similar events tend to be described with a similar set of words (e.g., "seismic energy" and "tectonic plates" for "the Great East Japan Earthquake" and "the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake"). As such, even if we cannot find in a text archive any explicitly expressed cause of an event (e.g., "the Great East Japan Earthquake") expressed in a question (e.g., "Why did the Great East Japan earthquake happen?"), we might be able to identify its implicitly expressed causes with a set of words (e.g., "tectonic plates") that appear in the explicitly expressed cause of a similar event (e.g., "the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake").
Jong-Hoon Oh, Kentaro Torisawa, Canasai Kruengkrai, Ryu Iida, Julien Kloetzer
WSDM3
2016 Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Network
abstract
This paper proposes a method for intrasentential subject zero anaphora resolution in Japanese.Our proposed method utilizes a Multi-column Convolutional Neural Network (MCNN) for predicting zero anaphoric relations.Motivated by Centering Theory and other previous works, we exploit as clues both the surface word sequence and the dependency tree of a target sentence in our MCNN.Even though the F-score of our method was lower than that of the state-of-the-art method, which achieved relatively high recall and low precision, our method achieved much higher precision (>0.8) in a wide range of recall levels.We believe such high precision is crucial for real-world NLP applications and thus our method is preferable to the state-of-the-art method.
Ryu Iida, Kentaro Torisawa, Jong-Hoon Oh, Canasai Kruengkrai, Julien Kloetzer
EMNLP4
2015 Recognizing Complex Negation on Twitter
Junta Mizuno, Canasai Kruengkrai, Kiyonori Ohtake, Chikara Hashimoto, Kentaro Torisawa, Julien Kloetzer, Kentaro Inui
PACLIC2
2014 An Example-Based Approach to Difficult Pronoun Resolution
Canasai Kruengkrai, Naoya Inoue, Jun Sugiura, Kentaro Inui
PACLIC1
2010 Adapting Chinese Word Segmentation for Machine Translation Based on Short Units
Yiou Wang, Kiyotaka Uchimoto, Jun'ichi Kazama, Canasai Kruengkrai, Kentaro Torisawa
LREC4
2009 An Error-Driven Word-Character Hybrid Model for Joint Chinese Word Segmentation and POS Tagging
Canasai Kruengkrai, Kiyotaka Uchimoto, Jun'ichi Kazama, Yiou Wang, Kentaro Torisawa, Hitoshi Isahara
ACL/IJCNLP1
2006 Word Knowledge Acquisition for Computational Lexicon Construction
Thatsanee Charoenporn, Canasai Kruengkrai, Thanaruk Theeramunkong, Virach Sornlertlamvanich, Hitoshi Isahara
LREC2
2006 A Conditional Random Field Framework for Thai Morphological Analysis
Canasai Kruengkrai, Virach Sornlertlamvanich, Hitoshi Isahara
LREC1
2005 Analysis of an Iterative Algorithm for Term-Based Ontology Alignment
Shisanu Tongchim, Canasai Kruengkrai, Virach Sornlertlamvanich, Prapass Srichaivattana, Hitoshi Isahara
IJCNLP2
2004 Enriching a Thai Lexical Database with Selectional Preferences
Canasai Kruengkrai, Thatsanee Charoenporn, Virach Sornlertlamvanich, Hitoshi Isahara
LREC1
2003 Refining A Divisive Partitioning Algorithm for Unsupervised Clustering
Canasai Kruengkrai, Virach Sornlertlamvanich, Hitoshi Isahara
HIS1
2003 Generic Text Summarization Using Local and Global Properties of Sentences
abstract
With the proliferation of text data on the World-Wide Web, the development of methods for automatically summarizing these data becomes more important. Here, we propose a practical approach for extracting the most relevant sentences from the original document to form a summary. The idea of our approach is to exploit both the local and global properties of sentences. The local property can be considered as clusters of significant words within each sentence, while the global property can be though of as relations of all sentences in the document. These two properties are combined to get a single measure reflecting the informativeness of sentences. Experimental results show that our approach compares favorably to a commercial text summarizer.
Canasai Kruengkrai, Chuleerat Jaruskulchai
Web Intelligence1
2002 A parallel learning algorithm for text classification
abstract
Text classification is the process of classifying documents into predefined categories based on their content. Existing supervised learning algorithms to automatically classify text need sufficient labeled documents to learn accurately. Applying the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm to this problem is an alternative approach that utilizes a large pool of unlabeled documents to augment the available labeled documents. Unfortunately, the time needed to learn with these large unlabeled documents is too high. This paper introduces a novel parallel learning algorithm for text classification task. The parallel algorithm is based on the combination of the EM algorithm and the naive Bayes classifier. Our goal is to improve the computational time in learning and classifying process. We studied the performance of our parallel algorithm on a large Linux PC cluster called PIRUN Cluster. We report both timing and accuracy results. These results indicate that the proposed parallel algorithm is capable of handling large document collections.
Canasai Kruengkrai, Chuleerat Jaruskulchai
KDD1