Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ziqing Zhuang

dblp:16/7176 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 50% Language models and text generation · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
metareasoning
1.012026
Beyond Meta-Reasoning: Metacognitive Consolidation for Self-Improving LLM Reasoning · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
self-improvement
1.012026
Beyond Meta-Reasoning: Metacognitive Consolidation for Self-Improving LLM Reasoning · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

metacognitive consolidation · 1.0hierarchical update · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Beyond Meta-Reasoning: Metacognitive Consolidation for Self-Improving LLM Reasoning
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning capabilities, and as existing approaches for enhancing LLM reasoning continue to mature, increasing attention has shifted toward meta-reasoning as a promising direction for further improvement.However, most existing meta-reasoning methods remain episodic: they focus on executing complex meta-reasoning routines within individual instances, but ignore the accumulation of reusable meta-reasoning skills across instances, leading to recurring failure modes and repeatedly high metacognitive effort.In this paper, we introduce Metacognitive Consolidation, a novel framework in which a model consolidates metacognitive experience from past reasoning episodes into reusable knowledge that improves future meta-reasoning.We instantiate this framework by structuring instance-level problem solving into distinct roles for reasoning, monitoring, and control to generate rich, attributable meta-level traces.These traces are then consolidated through a hierarchical, multi-timescale update mechanism that gradually forms evolving metaknowledge.Experimental results demonstrate consistent performance gains across benchmarks and backbone models, and show that performance improves as metacognitive experience accumulates over time.
Ziqing Zhuang, Linhai Zhang, Jiasheng Si, Yulan He 0001
ACL (1)1