Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Danny Shacham

dblp:16/8160 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 50% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
classifier combination
0.112007
Morphological Disambiguation of Hebrew: A Case Study in Classifier Combination · EMNLP-CoNLL 2007
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › morphological analysis
morphological disambiguation
0.112007
Morphological Disambiguation of Hebrew: A Case Study in Classifier Combination · EMNLP-CoNLL 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

classifier combination · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Morphological disambiguation of Hebrew: a case study in classifier combination
abstract
Abstract Morphological analysis and disambiguation are crucial stages in a variety of natural language processing applications, especially when languages with complex morphology are concerned. We present a system which disambiguates the output of a morphological analyzer for Hebrew. It consists of several simple classifiers and a module that combines them under the constraints imposed by the analyzer. We explore several approaches to classifier combination, as well as a back-off mechanism that relies on a large unannotated corpus. Our best result, around 83 percent accuracy, compares favorably with the state of the art on this task.
Gennadi Lembersky, Danny Shacham, Shuly Wintner
Nat. Lang. Eng.2
2007 Morphological Disambiguation of Hebrew: A Case Study in Classifier Combination
Danny Shacham, Shuly Wintner
EMNLP-CoNLL1