Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrew D. White

dblp:16/9205 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 50% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
reasoning model
0.912025
Training a Scientific Reasoning Model for Chemistry · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › complex reasoning
scientific reasoning
0.912025
Training a Scientific Reasoning Model for Chemistry · NeurIPS 2025
Computational science and engineering
chemistry
0.912025
Training a Scientific Reasoning Model for Chemistry · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › cheminformatics › molecule generation
molecular structure generation
0.912025
Training a Scientific Reasoning Model for Chemistry · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.7post-training · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Training a Scientific Reasoning Model for Chemistry
abstract
Reasoning models are large language models that use extra "thought tokens" before answering, providing both higher accuracy and explicit reasoning for their response. A major question has been whether language model reasoning generalizes beyond mathematics, programming, and logic, where most previous work has focused. We demonstrate that reasoning models can be post-trained in scientific domains without additional domain pretraining, and require substantially less data compared to contemporary domain-specific models. We report ether0, a 24B parameter LLM (based on Mistral-Small-24B) that can reason in natural language and respond with chemical structures. This reasoning model was trained with reinforcement learning on 577,790 experimentally-grounded chemistry tasks involving synthesized organic molecules. Our model outperforms all previous general-purpose chemistry models, frontier models, and humans, and is more data efficient relative to specialized models. We anticipate that this method can be applied to train highly data-efficient language models specialized for predictive and generative tasks across a wide variety of scientific domains.
Siddharth Narayanan, James D. Braza, Ryan-Rhys Griffiths, Albert Bou, Geemi P. Wellawatte, Mayk Caldas Ramos, Ludovico Mitchener, Michael Pieler, Samuel G. Rodriques, Andrew D. White
NeurIPS10
2007 The adoption of consortium B2B e-marketplaces: An exploratory study
Andrew D. White, Elizabeth M. Daniel, John M. Ward, Hugh Wilson
J. Strateg. Inf. Syst.1
2005 The future of inter-organisational system linkages: findings of an international Delphi study
abstract
To perform effectively in markets that are becoming increasingly turbulent and volatile, organisations should form information system linkages with their business partners. This study seeks to produce a ‘vision’ for the future of such linkages. A number of recent developments in information systems and technology (IS/IT) appear to promise the ability to make improvements in this domain. These are electronic hubs, web services, widespread adoption of common enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems and enterprise portals. This study, which is carried out by means of the Delphi technique, explores the expected future role and use of these information systems. The expert participants in the study believe that the focus of enterprise systems is shifting from an internal to an external orientation. They suggest that ERP systems may be reaching a structural limit concerning their capabilities and adjunct technologies will be required to integrate multiple inter-organisational operations. The participants expect that the three other systems and technologies considered can provide those necessary adjunct technologies, either used singly, or more likely in combination. Finally, we find that the transition to a greater external orientation is expected to include an extension in the types of organisations that will be integrated electronically into networks.
Elizabeth M. Daniel, Andrew D. White
Eur. J. Inf. Syst.2
2003 Electronic marketplace-to-marketplace alliances: emerging trends and strategic rationales
abstract
The electronic marketplace domain has recently witnessed the joining together of a number of previously independent marketplaces and the formation of collaborative alliances between others. This study seeks to determine the nature or type of cooperative arrangements or alliances that are currently being forged between electronic marketplaces, and the strategic rationale that is leading to this observed alliance formation. The findings of the study are based upon an examination of statements made to the press by marketplaces undertaking strategic alliances. This published data was supplemented with face-to-face interviews with managers at three relevant electronic marketplaces. Three distinct types of alliance are observed; the merger between previously separate marketplaces, the acquisition of one marketplace by another and the formation of an interoperability agreement between two marketplaces. Three rationales for alliance formation were observed: an increase in the number of buyers or suppliers in a given market sector that can access the marketplace (an increase in scale of operations), an increase in the breadth or depth of services that are offered to users of the marketplace (an increase in the scope of operations) and providing the ability to exchange information across multiple tiers of a supply chain. A broader discussion of the findings is given and suggestions for further research are made.
Andrew D. White, Elizabeth M. Daniel
ICEC1