VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert

Davera Gabriel

dblp:16/9383 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9041-4597ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 11 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 National COVID Cohort Collaborative data enhancements: a path for expanding common data models
abstract
OBJECTIVE: To support long COVID research in National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C), the N3C Phenotype and Data Acquisition team created data designs to aid contributing sites in enhancing their data. Enhancements include long COVID specialty clinic indicator; Admission, Discharge, and Transfer transactions; patient-level social determinants of health; and in-hospital use of oxygen supplementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For each enhancement, we defined the scope and wrote guidance on how to prepare and populate the data in a standardized way. RESULTS: As of June 2024, 29 sites have added at least one data enhancement to their N3C pipeline. DISCUSSION: The use of common data models is critical to the success of N3C; however, these data models cannot account for all needs. Project-driven data enhancement is required. This should be done in a standardized way in alignment with common data model specifications. Our approach offers a useful pathway for enhancing data to improve fit for purpose. CONCLUSION: In this initiative, we rapidly produced project-specific data modeling guidance and documentation in support of long COVID research while maintaining a commitment to terminology standards and harmonized data.
Kellie M. Walters, Marshall Clark, Sofia Dard, Stephanie S. Hong, Elizabeth Kelly, Kristin Kostka, Adam M. Lee, Robert T. Miller, Michele Morris, Matvey Palchuk, Emily R. Pfaff, Adam B. Wilcox, Alexis Graves, Alfred Anzalone, Amin Manna, Amit Saha, Amy Olex, Andrea Zhou, Andrew E. Williams, Andrew Southerland, Andrew T. Girvin, Anita Walden, Anjali A Sharathkumar, Benjamin R. C. Amor, Benjamin Bates, Brian Hendricks, Caleb Alexander, Carolyn T. Bramante, Cavin Ward-Caviness, Charisse R. Madlock-Brown, Christine Suver, Christopher G. Chute, Christopher Dillon, Chunlei Wu, Clare Schmitt, Cliff Takemoto, Dan Housman, Davera Gabriel, David Eichmann, Diego Mazzotti, Don Brown, Eilis A. Boudreau, Elaine L. Hill, Elizabeth Zampino, Emily Carlson Marti, Evan French, Farrukh M. Koraishy, Federico Mariona, Fred W. Prior, George Sokos, Greg Martin, Harold P. Lehmann, Heidi Spratt, Hemalkumar Mehta, Hythem Sidky, J. W. Awori Hayanga, Jami Pincavitch, Jaylyn Clark, Jeremy Richard Harper, Jessica Islam, Jin Ge, Joel Gagnier, Joel H. Saltz, Johanna Loomba, John Buse, Jomol P. Mathew, Joni L. Rutter, Julie A. McMurry, Justin Guinney, Justin Starren, Karen Crowley, Katie Rebecca Bradwell, Ken Wilkins, Kenneth R. Gersing, Kenrick Dwain Cato, Kimberly Murray, Lavance Northington, Lee Allan Pyles, Leonie Misquitta, Lesley Cottrell, Lili M. Portilla, Mariam Deacy, Mark M. Bissell, Mary Emmett, Mary Morrison Saltz, Melissa A. Haendel, Meredith C. B. Adams, Meredith Temple-O'Connor, Michael G. Kurilla, Nabeel Qureshi, Nasia Safdar, Nicole Garbarini, Noha Sharafeldin, Ofer Sadan, Patricia A. Francis, Penny Wung Burgoon, Peter N. Robinson, Philip R. O. Payne, Rafael Fuentes, Randeep Jawa, Rebecca Erwin-Cohen, Rena Patel, Richard A. Moffitt, Richard L. Zhu, Rishi Kamaleswaran, Robert Hurley, Saiju Pyarajan, Samuel G. Michael, Samuel Bozzette, Sandeep Mallipattu, Satyanarayana Vedula, Scott Chapman, Shawn T. O'Neil, Soko Setoguchi, Tellen D. Bennett, Tiffany Callahan, Umit Topaloglu, Usman Sheikh, Valery Gordon, Vignesh Subbian, Warren A. Kibbe, Wenndy Hernandez, Will Beasley, Will Cooper, William Hillegass, Xiaohan Tanner Zhang
 J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.39
2022 Synergies between centralized and federated approaches to data quality: a report from the national COVID cohort collaborative
abstract
OBJECTIVE: In response to COVID-19, the informatics community united to aggregate as much clinical data as possible to characterize this new disease and reduce its impact through collaborative analytics. The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) is now the largest publicly available HIPAA limited dataset in US history with over 6.4 million patients and is a testament to a partnership of over 100 organizations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a pipeline for ingesting, harmonizing, and centralizing data from 56 contributing data partners using 4 federated Common Data Models. N3C data quality (DQ) review involves both automated and manual procedures. In the process, several DQ heuristics were discovered in our centralized context, both within the pipeline and during downstream project-based analysis. Feedback to the sites led to many local and centralized DQ improvements. RESULTS: Beyond well-recognized DQ findings, we discovered 15 heuristics relating to source Common Data Model conformance, demographics, COVID tests, conditions, encounters, measurements, observations, coding completeness, and fitness for use. Of 56 sites, 37 sites (66%) demonstrated issues through these heuristics. These 37 sites demonstrated improvement after receiving feedback. DISCUSSION: We encountered site-to-site differences in DQ which would have been challenging to discover using federated checks alone. We have demonstrated that centralized DQ benchmarking reveals unique opportunities for DQ improvement that will support improved research analytics locally and in aggregate. CONCLUSION: By combining rapid, continual assessment of DQ with a large volume of multisite data, it is possible to support more nuanced scientific questions with the scale and rigor that they require.
Emily R. Pfaff, Andrew T. Girvin, Davera Gabriel, Kristin Kostka, Michele Morris, Matvey Palchuk, Harold P. Lehmann, Benjamin R. C. Amor, Mark Bissell, Katie R. Bradwell, Sigfried Gold, Stephanie S. Hong, Johanna Loomba, Amin Manna, Julie A. McMurry, Emily Niehaus, Nabeel Qureshi, Anita Walden, Xiaohan Tanner Zhang, Richard L. Zhu, Richard A. Moffitt, Christopher G. Chute, William G. Adams, Shaymaa Al-Shukri, Alfred Anzalone, Ahmad Baghal, Tellen D. Bennett, Elmer V. Bernstam, Mark M. Bissell, Brian Bush, Thomas R. Campion Jr., Victor Castro, Jack Chang, Deepa D. Chaudhari, Wenjin Chen, San Chu, James J. Cimino, Keith A. Crandall, Mark Crooks, Sara J. Deakyne Davies, John Dipalazzo, David A. Dorr, Daniel Eckrich, Sarah E. Eltinge, Daniel G. Fort, Georgiy Golovko, Snehil Gupta, Melissa A. Haendel, Janos G. Hajagos, David A. Hanauer, Brett M. Harnett, Ronald Horswell, Nancy Huang, Steven G. Johnson, Michael Kahn, Kamil Khanipov, Curtis Kieler, Katherine Ruiz De Luzuriaga, Sarah E. Maidlow, Ashley Martinez, Jomol Mathew, James C. McClay, Gabriel McMahan, Brian Melancon, Stéphane M. Meystre, Lucio Miele, Hiroki Morizono, Ray Pablo, Lav P. Patel, Jimmy Phuong, Daniel J. Popham, Claudia P. Pulgarin, Indra Neil Sarkar, Nancy Sazo, Soko Setoguchi, Selvin Soby, Sirisha Surampalli, Christine Suver, Uma Maheswara Reddy Vangala, Shyam Visweswaran, James von Oehsen, Kellie M. Walters, Laura K. Wiley, David A. Williams, Adrian H. Zai
 J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.3
2022 Demonstrating an approach for evaluating synthetic geospatial and temporal epidemiologic data utility: results from analyzing >1.8 million SARS-CoV-2 tests in the United States National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)
abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to evaluate whether synthetic data derived from a national coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) dataset could be used for geospatial and temporal epidemic analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using an original dataset (n = 1 854 968 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 tests) and its synthetic derivative, we compared key indicators of COVID-19 community spread through analysis of aggregate and zip code-level epidemic curves, patient characteristics and outcomes, distribution of tests by zip code, and indicator counts stratified by month and zip code. Similarity between the data was statistically and qualitatively evaluated. RESULTS: In general, synthetic data closely matched original data for epidemic curves, patient characteristics, and outcomes. Synthetic data suppressed labels of zip codes with few total tests (mean = 2.9 ± 2.4; max = 16 tests; 66% reduction of unique zip codes). Epidemic curves and monthly indicator counts were similar between synthetic and original data in a random sample of the most tested (top 1%; n = 171) and for all unsuppressed zip codes (n = 5819), respectively. In small sample sizes, synthetic data utility was notably decreased. DISCUSSION: Analyses on the population-level and of densely tested zip codes (which contained most of the data) were similar between original and synthetically derived datasets. Analyses of sparsely tested populations were less similar and had more data suppression. CONCLUSION: In general, synthetic data were successfully used to analyze geospatial and temporal trends. Analyses using small sample sizes or populations were limited, in part due to purposeful data label suppression-an attribute disclosure countermeasure. Users should consider data fitness for use in these cases.
Jason A. Thomas, Randi E. Foraker, Noa Zamstein, Jon D. Morrow, Philip R. O. Payne, Adam B. Wilcox, Melissa A. Haendel, Christopher G. Chute, Kenneth R. Gersing, Anita Walden, Tellen D. Bennett, David Eichmann, Justin Guinney, Warren A. Kibbe, Emily R. Pfaff, Peter N. Robinson, Joel H. Saltz, Heidi Spratt, Justin Starren, Christine Suver, Chunlei Wu, Davera Gabriel, Stephanie S. Hong, Kristin Kostka, Harold P. Lehmann, Richard A. Moffitt, Michele Morris, Matvey Palchuk, Xiaohan Tanner Zhang, Richard L. Zhu, Benjamin R. C. Amor, Mark M. Bissell, Marshall Clark, Andrew T. Girvin, Adam M. Lee, Robert T. Miller, Kellie M. Walters, Yooree Chae, Connor Cook, Alexandra Dest, Racquel R. Dietz, Thomas Dillon, Patricia A. Francis, Rafael Fuentes, Alexis Graves, Andrew J. Neumann, Shawn T. O'Neil, Usman Sheikh, Andréa M. Volz, Elizabeth Zampino, Christopher P. Austin, Samuel Bozzette, Mariam Deacy, Nicole Garbarini, Michael G. Kurilla, Samuel G. Michael, Joni L. Rutter, Meredith Temple-O'Connor, Katie Rebecca Bradwell, Amin Manna, Nabeel Qureshi, Mary Morrison Saltz, Julie A. McMurry, Carolyn T. Bramante, Jeremy Richard Harper, Wenndy Hernandez, Farrukh M. Koraishy, Federico Mariona, Saidulu Mattapally, Amit Saha, Satyanarayana Vedula, Yujuan Fu, Nisha Mathews, Ofer Mendelevitch
 J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.23
2022 Developing an ETL tool for converting the PCORnet CDM into the OMOP CDM to facilitate the COVID-19 data integration
Yue Yu 0012, Nansu Zong, Andrew Wen, Sijia Liu 0002, Daniel J. Stone, David Knaack, Alanna M. Chamberlain, Emily R. Pfaff, Davera Gabriel, Christopher G. Chute, Nilay Shah, Guoqian Jiang
 J. Biomed. Informatics9
2021 The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C): Rationale, design, infrastructure, and deployment
abstract
OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) poses societal challenges that require expeditious data and knowledge sharing. Though organizational clinical data are abundant, these are largely inaccessible to outside researchers. Statistical, machine learning, and causal analyses are most successful with large-scale data beyond what is available in any given organization. Here, we introduce the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C), an open science community focused on analyzing patient-level data from many centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Clinical and Translational Science Award Program and scientific community created N3C to overcome technical, regulatory, policy, and governance barriers to sharing and harmonizing individual-level clinical data. We developed solutions to extract, aggregate, and harmonize data across organizations and data models, and created a secure data enclave to enable efficient, transparent, and reproducible collaborative analytics. RESULTS: Organized in inclusive workstreams, we created legal agreements and governance for organizations and researchers; data extraction scripts to identify and ingest positive, negative, and possible COVID-19 cases; a data quality assurance and harmonization pipeline to create a single harmonized dataset; population of the secure data enclave with data, machine learning, and statistical analytics tools; dissemination mechanisms; and a synthetic data pilot to democratize data access. CONCLUSIONS: The N3C has demonstrated that a multisite collaborative learning health network can overcome barriers to rapidly build a scalable infrastructure incorporating multiorganizational clinical data for COVID-19 analytics. We expect this effort to save lives by enabling rapid collaboration among clinicians, researchers, and data scientists to identify treatments and specialized care and thereby reduce the immediate and long-term impacts of COVID-19.
Melissa A. Haendel, Christopher G. Chute, Tellen D. Bennett, David Eichmann, Justin Guinney, Warren A. Kibbe, Philip R. O. Payne, Emily R. Pfaff, Peter N. Robinson, Joel H. Saltz, Heidi Spratt, Christine Suver, John Wilbanks, Adam B. Wilcox, Andrew E. Williams, Chunlei Wu, Clair Blacketer, Robert L. Bradford, James J. Cimino, Marshall Clark, Evan W. Colmenares, Patricia A. Francis, Davera Gabriel, Alexis Graves, Raju Hemadri, Stephanie S. Hong, George Hripcsak, Dazhi Jiao, Jeffrey G. Klann, Kristin Kostka, Adam M. Lee, Harold P. Lehmann, Lora Lingrey, Robert T. Miller, Michele Morris, Shawn N. Murphy, Karthik Natarajan, Matvey Palchuk, Usman Sheikh, Harold R. Solbrig, Shyam Visweswaran, Anita Walden, Kellie M. Walters, Griffin M. Weber, Xiaohan Tanner Zhang, Richard L. Zhu, Benjamin R. C. Amor, Andrew T. Girvin, Amin Manna, Nabeel Qureshi, Michael G. Kurilla, Samuel G. Michael, Lili M. Portilla, Joni L. Rutter, Christopher P. Austin, Kenneth R. Gersing
 J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.23
2019 Achieving Data Liquidity: Lessons Learned from Analysis of 38 Clinical Registries (The Duke-Pew Data Interoperability Project)
James E. Tcheng, Joseph P. Drozda Jr., Davera Gabriel, Anne Heath, Rebecca Wilgus, Mary Williams, Thomas Windle, John R. Windle
 AMIA3
2014 Brief communication: pSCANNER: patient-centered Scalable National Network for Effectiveness Research
abstract
This article describes the patient-centered Scalable National Network for Effectiveness Research (pSCANNER), which is part of the recently formed PCORnet, a national network composed of learning healthcare systems and patient-powered research networks funded by the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). It is designed to be a stakeholder-governed federated network that uses a distributed architecture to integrate data from three existing networks covering over 21 million patients in all 50 states: (1) VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI), with data from Veteran Health Administration's 151 inpatient and 909 ambulatory care and community-based outpatient clinics; (2) the University of California Research exchange (UC-ReX) network, with data from UC Davis, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Diego; and (3) SCANNER, a consortium of UCSD, Tennessee VA, and three federally qualified health systems in the Los Angeles area supplemented with claims and health information exchange data, led by the University of Southern California. Initial use cases will focus on three conditions: (1) congestive heart failure; (2) Kawasaki disease; (3) obesity. Stakeholders, such as patients, clinicians, and health service researchers, will be engaged to prioritize research questions to be answered through the network. We will use a privacy-preserving distributed computation model with synchronous and asynchronous modes. The distributed system will be based on a common data model that allows the construction and evaluation of distributed multivariate models for a variety of statistical analyses.
Lucila Ohno-Machado, Zia Agha, Douglas S. Bell, Lisa Dahm, Michele E. Day, Jason N. Doctor, Davera Gabriel, Maninder K. Kahlon, Katherine K. Kim, Michael A. Hogarth, Michael E. Matheny, Daniella Meeker, Jonathan R. Nebeker
 J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.7
2013 The Semantic Alignment Lifecycle: A Best Practice Developed to Harmonize Distributed Research Data Resources
Davera Gabriel, Nicholas R. Anderson 0001, Michael A. Hogarth
 AMIA1
2012 Implementation of a deidentified federated data network for population-based cohort discovery
abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Cross-Institutional Clinical Translational Research project explored a federated query tool and looked at how this tool can facilitate clinical trial cohort discovery by managing access to aggregate patient data located within unaffiliated academic medical centers. METHODS: The project adapted software from the Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) program to connect three Clinical Translational Research Award sites: University of Washington, Seattle, University of California, Davis, and University of California, San Francisco. The project developed an iterative spiral software development model to support the implementation and coordination of this multisite data resource. RESULTS: By standardizing technical infrastructures, policies, and semantics, the project enabled federated querying of deidentified clinical datasets stored in separate institutional environments and identified barriers to engaging users for measuring utility. DISCUSSION: The authors discuss the iterative development and evaluation phases of the project and highlight the challenges identified and the lessons learned. CONCLUSION: The common system architecture and translational processes provide high-level (aggregate) deidentified access to a large patient population (>5 million patients), and represent a novel and extensible resource. Enhancing the network for more focused disease areas will require research-driven partnerships represented across all partner sites.
Nicholas R. Anderson 0001, Aaron Abend, Aaron Mandel, Estella M. Geraghty, Davera Gabriel, Rob Wynden, Michael Kamerick, Kent Anderson, Julie Rainwater, Peter Tarczy-Hornoch
 J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.5
2011 The Biomedical Resource Ontology (BRO) to enable resource discovery in clinical and translational research
abstract
The biomedical research community relies on a diverse set of resources, both within their own institutions and at other research centers. In addition, an increasing number of shared electronic resources have been developed. Without effective means to locate and query these resources, it is challenging, if not impossible, for investigators to be aware of the myriad resources available, or to effectively perform resource discovery when the need arises. In this paper, we describe the development and use of the Biomedical Resource Ontology (BRO) to enable semantic annotation and discovery of biomedical resources. We also describe the Resource Discovery System (RDS) which is a federated, inter-institutional pilot project that uses the BRO to facilitate resource discovery on the Internet. Through the RDS framework and its associated Biositemaps infrastructure, the BRO facilitates semantic search and discovery of biomedical resources, breaking down barriers and streamlining scientific research that will improve human health.
Jessica D. Tenenbaum, Patricia L. Whetzel, Kent Anderson, Charles D. Borromeo, Ivo D. Dinov, Davera Gabriel, Beth A. Kirschner, Barbara Mirel, Timothy D. Morris, Natasha F. Noy, Csongor Nyulas, David Rubenson, Paul R. Saxman, Nancy Whelan, Zachary C. Wright, Brian D. Athey, Michael J. Becich, Geoffrey S. Ginsburg, Mark A. Musen, Kevin A. Smith 0001, Alice F. Tarantal, Daniel L. Rubin, Peter Lyster
 J. Biomed. Informatics6
2009 Development and Evaluation of a Study Design Typology for Human Research
Simona Carini, Brad Pollock, Harold P. Lehmann, Suzanne Bakken, Edward M. Barbour, Davera Gabriel, Herbert K. Hagler, Caryn R. Harper, Shamim Mollah, Meredith Nahm, Hien H. Nguyen, Richard H. Scheuermann, Ida Sim
 AMIA6