Hyperdimensional Computing affords simple, yet powerful operations to create long Hyperdimensional Vectors (hypervectors) that can efficiently encode information, be used for learning, and are dynamic enough to be modified on the fly. In this paper, we explore the notion of using binary hypervectors to directly encode the final, classifying output signals of neural networks in order to fuse differing networks together at the symbolic level. This allows multiple neural networks to work together to solve a problem, with little additional overhead. Output signals just before classification are encoded as hyper-vectors and bundled together through consensus summation to train a classification hypervector. This process can be performed iteratively and even on single neural networks by instead making a consensus of multiple classification hypervectors. We find that this outperforms the state of the art, or is on a par with it, while using very little overhead, as hypervector operations are extremely fast and efficient in comparison to the neural networks. This consensus process can learn online and even grow or lose models in real time. Hypervectors act as memories that can be stored, and even further bundled together over time, affording life long learning capabilities. Additionally, this consensus structure inherits the benefits of Hyperdimensional Computing, without sacrificing the performance of modern Machine Learning. This technique can be extrapolated to virtually any neural model, and requires little modification to employ - one simply requires recording the output signals of networks when presented with a testing example.

We evaluate an annotation schema for labeling logical fallacy types, originally developed for a crowd-sourcing annotation paradigm, now using an annotation paradigm of two trained linguist annotators. We apply the schema to a variety of different genres of text relating to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our linguist (as opposed to crowd-sourced) annotation of logical fallacies allows us to evaluate whether the annotation schema category labels are sufficiently clear and non-overlapping for both manual and, later, system assignment. We report inter-annotator agreement results over two annotation phases as well as a preliminary assessment of the corpus for training and testing a machine learning algorithm (Pattern-Exploiting Training) for fallacy detection and recognition. The agreement results and system performance underscore the challenging nature of this annotation task and suggest that the annotation schema and paradigm must be iteratively evaluated and refined in order to arrive at a set of annotation labels that can be reproduced by human annotators and, in turn, provide reliable training data for automatic detection and recognition systems.

Problems at the intersection of vision and language are of significant importance both as challenging research questions and for the rich set of applications they enable. However, inherent structure in our world and bias in our language tend to be a simpler signal for learning than visual modalities, resulting in models that ignore visual information, leading to an inflated sense of their capability. We propose to counter these language priors for the task of Visual Question Answering (VQA) and make vision (the V in VQA) matter! Specifically, we balance the popular VQA dataset (Antol et al., ICCV 2015) by collecting complementary images such that every question in our balanced dataset is associated with not just a single image, but rather a pair of similar images that result in two different answers to the question. Our dataset is by construction more balanced than the original VQA dataset and has approximately twice the number of image-question pairs. Our complete balanced dataset is publicly available at http://visualqa.org/ as part of the 2nd iteration of the Visual Question Answering Dataset and Challenge (VQA v2.0). We further benchmark a number of state-of-art VQA models on our balanced dataset. All models perform significantly worse on our balanced dataset, suggesting that these models have indeed learned to exploit language priors. This finding provides the first concrete empirical evidence for what seems to be a qualitative sense among practitioners. Finally, our data collection protocol for identifying complementary images enables us to develop a novel interpretable model, which in addition to providing an answer to the given (image, question) pair, also provides a counter-example based explanation. Specifically, it identifies an image that is similar to the original image, but it believes has a different answer to the same question. This can help in building trust for machines among their users.

The complex compositional structure of language makes problems at the intersection of vision and language challenging. But language also provides a strong prior that can result in good superficial performance, without the underlying models truly understanding the visual content. This can hinder progress in pushing state of art in the computer vision aspects of multi-modal AI. In this paper, we address binary Visual Question Answering (VQA) on abstract scenes. We formulate this problem as visual verification of concepts inquired in the questions. Specifically, we convert the question to a tuple that concisely summarizes the visual concept to be detected in the image. If the concept can be found in the image, the answer to the question is "yes", and otherwise "no". Abstract scenes play two roles (1) They allow us to focus on the highlevel semantics of the VQA task as opposed to the low-level recognition problems, and perhaps more importantly, (2) They provide us the modality to balance the dataset such that language priors are controlled, and the role of vision is essential. In particular, we collect fine-grained pairs of scenes for every question, such that the answer to the question is "yes" for one scene, and "no" for the other for the exact same question. Indeed, language priors alone do not perform better than chance on our balanced dataset. Moreover, our proposed approach matches the performance of a state-of-the-art VQA approach on the unbalanced dataset, and outperforms it on the balanced dataset.

There is good reason to believe that humans use some kind of recursive grammatical structure when we recognize and perform complex manipulation activities. We have built a system to automatically build a tree structure from observations of an actor performing such activities. The activity trees that result form a framework for search and understanding, tying action to language. We explore and evaluate the system by performing experiments over a novel complex activity dataset taken using synchronized Kinect and SR4000 Time of Flight cameras. Processing of the combined 3D and 2D image data provides the necessary terminals and events to build the tree from the bottom-up. Experimental results highlight the contribution of the action grammar in: 1) providing a robust structure for complex activity recognition over real data and 2) disambiguating interleaved activities from within the same sequence.