Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Huaming Yang

dblp:160/3165 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-4186-0109ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection › location privacy
location-based services
0.812024
A Comprehensive Study of Trajectory Forgery and Detection in Location-Based Services · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024
Privacy and data protection
location privacy
0.812024
A Comprehensive Study of Trajectory Forgery and Detection in Location-Based Services · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024
Privacy and data protection › location privacy
trajectory privacy
0.812024
A Comprehensive Study of Trajectory Forgery and Detection in Location-Based Services · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trajectory analysis · 0.8detection · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 A Comprehensive Study of Trajectory Forgery and Detection in Location-Based Services
Huaming Yang, Zhongzhou Xia, Jersy Shin, Jingyu Hua, Yunlong Mao, Sheng Zhong 0002
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput.1
2022 Are You Moving as You Claim: GPS Trajectory Forgery and Detection in Location-Based Services
abstract
Many mobile apps access users’ trajectories to provide critical services (e.g., trip tracking). Unfortunately, in such apps, malicious users may upload fake trajectories to cheat providers for illegal benefits. There are few works in the literature that delicately study trajectory forgery problems. In this paper, we first take the perspective of attackers and consider how they fabricate vivid trajectories confronting a strict provider. In particular, we use the technique of adversarial examples in deep learning to propose a trajectory forgery method, which produces fake trajectories satisfying two conditions: (1) having the motion characteristics indistinguishable from those of real ones, and (2) matching a reasonable walking, cycling, or driving route when being projected to the map. We show through experiments that they can hardly be detected by mainstream trajectory service providers, even after being equipped with machine learning-based approaches. Therefore, we further present a dedicated countermeasure by validating the reasonability of reported received signal strength indicator (RSSI) data of WiFi access points (APs) nearby every location. It can well deal with the most challenging replay scenario, which can hardly be handled by existing WiFi-based location verification methods. We conduct extensive real-world experiments in three local commercial areas covering walking, cycling, and driving scenarios. Results demonstrate the high detection accuracy of this method.
Huaming Yang, Zhongzhou Xia, Jersy Shin, Jingyu Hua, Yunlong Mao, Sheng Zhong 0002
ICDCS1