Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Te Pi

dblp:160/5946 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 54% Learning paradigms · 46%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank
0.522017
Learning Bregman Distance Functions for Structural Learning to Rank · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2017
Structural Bregman Distance Functions Learning to Rank with Self-Reinforcement · ICDM 2014
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot learning
0.312017
Boosted Zero-Shot Learning with Semantic Correlation Regularization · IJCAI 2017
Information retrieval › ranking › search ranking
proximity ranking
0.312017
Learning Bregman Distance Functions for Structural Learning to Rank · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2017
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › curriculum learning
self-paced learning
0.212016
Self-Paced Boost Learning for Classification · IJCAI 2016
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.212014
Structural Bregman Distance Functions Learning to Rank with Self-Reinforcement · ICDM 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

structural SVM · 0.8robust structural learning · 0.6bregman distance · 0.6boosting · 0.5sample selection · 0.3self-paced learning · 0.2quadratic programming · 0.2bregman divergence · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Boosted Zero-Shot Learning with Semantic Correlation Regularization
abstract
We study zero-shot learning (ZSL) as a transfer learning problem, and focus on the two key aspects of ZSL, model effectiveness and model adaptation. For effective modeling, we adopt the boosting strategy to learn a zero-shot classifier from weak models to a strong model. For adaptable knowledge transfer, we devise a Semantic Correlation Regularization (SCR) approach to regularize the boosted model to be consistent with the inter-class semantic correlations. With SCR embedded in the boosting objective, and with a self-controlled sample selection for learning robustness, we propose a unified framework, Boosted Zero-shot classification with Semantic Correlation Regularization (BZ-SCR). By balancing the SCR-regularized boosted model selection and the self-controlled sample selection, BZ-SCR is capable of capturing both discriminative and adaptable feature-to-class semantic alignments, while ensuring the reliability and adaptability of the learned samples. The experiments on two ZSL datasets show the superiority of BZ-SCR over the state-of-the-arts.
Te Pi, Xi Li 0001, Zhongfei Zhang
IJCAI1
2017 Learning Bregman Distance Functions for Structural Learning to Rank
abstract
We study content-based learning to rank from the perspective of learning distance functions. Standardly, the two key issues of learning to rank, feature mappings and score functions, are usually modeled separately, and the learning is usually restricted to modeling a linear distance function such as the Mahalanobis distance. However, the modeling of feature mappings and score functions are mutually interacted, and the patterns underlying the data are probably complicated and nonlinear. Thus, as a general nonlinear distance family, the Bregman distance is a suitable distance function for learning to rank, due to its strong generalization ability for distance functions, and its nonlinearity for exploring the general patterns of data distributions. In this paper, we study learning to rank as a structural learning problem, and devise a Bregman distance function to build the ranking model based on structural SVM. To improve the model robustness to outliers, we develop a robust structural learning framework for the ranking model. The proposed model Robust Structural Bregman distance functions Learning to Rank (RSBLR) is a general and unified framework for learning distance functions to rank. The experiments of data ranking on real-world datasets show the superiority of this method to the state-of-the-art literature, as well as its robustness to the noisily labeled outliers.
Xi Li 0001, Te Pi, Zhongfei Zhang, Xueyi Zhao, Meng Wang 0001, Xuelong Li 0001, Philip S. Yu
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.2
2016 Self-Paced Boost Learning for Classification
Te Pi, Xi Li 0001, Zhongfei Zhang, Deyu Meng, Fei Wu 0001, Jun Xiao 0001, Yueting Zhuang
IJCAI1
2014 Structural Bregman Distance Functions Learning to Rank with Self-Reinforcement
abstract
Learning to rank is an important task for many data mining applications. Essentially, the goal of learning to rank is to learn an appropriate similarity or distance metric to determine the relevance relationships among data points. However, most of the existing approaches for distance metric learning are limited in three aspects. First, they often assume a fixed form of distance metric for the entire input space. Second, the assumed distance functions are often computationally expensive or even intractable to learn for high dimensional data, such as Mahalanobis distance. Third, most of these approaches lack robustness to noisily labeled data, which is pervasive in many real-world applications. In this paper, we study learning to rank as a problem of distance metric learning to address the above three problems. We choose Bregman distance as the target distance function, due to its general functional form as a generalization of a wide class of distance functions, and its capacity of exploiting complicated nonlinear patterns underlying the data. Under the framework of structural SVM, we formulate the problem of learning Bregman distance functions for ranking as a QP problem by a nonparametric approach, and present an effective algorithm. Furthermore, we propose a self-reinforcement scheme that adaptively differentiates each data point in the role of learning to secure the robustness. We emphasize that the proposed method SBLR-S (Structural Bregman distance functions Learning to Rank with Self-reinforcement) is more general than the conventional distance metric learning approaches, and is able to handle high dimensional data as well as noisily labeled data. The experiments of data ranking on real-world datasets show the superiority of this method to the state-of-the-art literature.
Te Pi, Xi Li 0001, Zhongfei Zhang
ICDM1