Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Samuel Maurus
dblp:160/5951
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 5 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers |
Data mining · 78% Recommender systems · 15% Data integration and cleaning · 7% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.7 | 3 | 2016 | Generalized Independent Subspace Clustering · ICDM 2016 Factorizing Complex Discrete Data "with Finesse" · ICDM 2016 Ternary Matrix Factorization · ICDM 2014 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Skinny-dip: Clustering in a Sea of Noise · KDD 2016 Generalized Independent Subspace Clustering · ICDM 2016 |
Recommender systems › collaborative filtering
matrix factorization |
0.4 | 2 | 2016 | Factorizing Complex Discrete Data "with Finesse" · ICDM 2016 Ternary Matrix Factorization · ICDM 2014 |
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Let's See Your Digits: Anomalous-State Detection using Benford's Law · KDD 2017 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › blind source separation
independent component analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Generalized Independent Subspace Clustering · ICDM 2016 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › blind source separation › independent component analysis
independent subspace analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Generalized Independent Subspace Clustering · ICDM 2016 |
Data mining › clustering
high-dimensional clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Skinny-dip: Clustering in a Sea of Noise · KDD 2016 |
Data mining › clustering › robust clustering
noise-robust clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Skinny-dip: Clustering in a Sea of Noise · KDD 2016 |
Data mining › clustering › high-dimensional clustering
subspace clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Generalized Independent Subspace Clustering · ICDM 2016 |
Data integration and cleaning › missing data
missing value imputation |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Ternary Matrix Factorization · ICDM 2014 |
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention › intrusion detection
attack detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Let's See Your Digits: Anomalous-State Detection using Benford's Law · KDD 2017 |
Information theory
minimum description length |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Generalized Independent Subspace Clustering · ICDM 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
minimum description length · 0.8independent subspace analysis · 0.8unsupervised detection · 0.6benford-conformity test · 0.6benford's law · 0.6univariate projection · 0.2multimodal projection pursuit · 0.2hartigan dip test · 0.2ternary logic · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Let's See Your Digits: Anomalous-State Detection using Benford's LawabstractBenford's Law explains a curious phenomenon in which the leading digits of "naturally-occurring" numerical data are distributed in a precise fashion. In this paper we begin by showing that system metrics generated by many modern information systems like Twitter, Wikipedia, YouTube and GitHub obey this law. We then propose a novel unsupervised approach called BenFound that exploits this property to detect anomalous system events. BenFound tracks the "Benfordness" of key system metrics, like the follower counts of tweeting Twitter users or the change deltas in Wikipedia page edits. It then applies a novel Benford-conformity test in real-time to identify "non-Benford events". We investigate a variety of such events, showing that they correspond to unnatural and often undesirable system interactions like spamming, hashtag-hijacking and denial-of-service attacks. The result is a technically-uncomplicated and effective "red flagging" technique that can be used to complement existing anomaly-detection approaches. Although not without its limitations, it is highly efficient and requires neither obscure parameters, nor text streams, nor natural-language processing. Samuel Maurus, Claudia Plant |
KDD | 1 |
| 2016 | Factorizing Complex Discrete Data "with Finesse"abstractCan we mine latent patterns from discrete, non-numeric heterogeneous data? Many modern data sets contain heterogeneous non-numerical information measured over Boolean, ordinal and ternary scales. Values for features like these are "mixable" in the sense that they have intuitive non-linear analogs to classical "addition" (e.g. logical OR for Boolean data). We present a novel, general and extensible matrix factorization framework for any such "mixable" features. The framework lets us support heterogeneous data and encourages us to deduce other interesting "mixable" features, like those which encapsulate sub-trees over an ontology. We present Finesse, an algorithm with linear run-time complexity in the size of the data. Finesse outperforms state-of-the-art techniques in the special cases in terms of effectiveness and efficiency, and yields insightful patterns from its novel application to large real-world heterogeneous data. Samuel Maurus, Claudia Plant |
ICDM | 1 |
| 2016 | Generalized Independent Subspace ClusteringabstractData can encapsulate different object groupings in subspaces of arbitrary dimension and orientation. Finding such subspaces and the groupings within them is the goal of generalized subspace clustering. In this work we present a generalized subspace clustering technique capable of finding multiple non-redundant clusterings in arbitrarily-oriented subspaces. We use Independent Subspace Analysis (ISA) to find the subspace collection that minimizes the statistical dependency (redundancy) between clusterings. We then cluster in the arbitrarily-oriented subspaces identified by ISA. Our algorithm ISAAC (Independent Subspace Analysis and Clustering) uses the Minimum Description Length principle to automatically choose parameters that are otherwise difficult to set. We comprehensively demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on synthetic and real-world data. Wei Ye 0001, Samuel Maurus, Nina C. Hubig, Claudia Plant |
ICDM | 2 |
| 2016 | Skinny-dip: Clustering in a Sea of NoiseabstractCan we find heterogeneous clusters hidden in data sets with 80% noise? Although such settings occur in the real-world, we struggle to find methods from the abundance of clustering techniques that perform well with noise at this level. Indeed, perhaps this is enough of a departure from classical clustering to warrant its study as a separate problem. In this paper we present SkinnyDip which, based on Hartigan's elegant dip test of unimodality, represents an intriguing approach to clustering with an attractive set of properties. Specifically, SkinnyDip is highly noise-robust, practically parameter-free and completely deterministic. SkinnyDip never performs multivariate distance calculations, but rather employs insightful recursion based on "dips" into univariate projections of the data. It is able to detect a range of cluster shapes and densities, assuming only that each cluster admits a unimodal shape. Practically, its run-time grows linearly with the data. Finally, for high-dimensional data, continuity properties of the dip enable SkinnyDip to exploit multimodal projection pursuit in order to find an appropriate basis for clustering. Although not without its limitations, SkinnyDip compares favorably to a variety of clustering approaches on synthetic and real data, particularly in high-noise settings. Samuel Maurus, Claudia Plant |
KDD | 1 |
| 2016 | Ternary Matrix Factorization: problem definitions and algorithms
Samuel Maurus, Claudia Plant |
Knowl. Inf. Syst. | 1 |
| 2014 | Ternary Matrix FactorizationabstractCan we learn from the unknown? Logical data sets of the ternary kind are often found in information systems. They contain unknown as well as true/false values. An unknown value may represent a missing entry (lost or indeterminable) or something with meaning, like a "Don't Know" response in a questionnaire. In this paper we introduce an effectively- and efficiently-superior algorithm for reducing the dimensionality of logical data (categorical data in general) in the context of a new data mining challenge: Ternary Matrix Factorization (TMF). For a ternary data matrix, TMF exploits ternary logic to produce a basis matrix (which holds the major patterns in the data) and a usage matrix (which maps patterns to original observations). Both matrices are interpretable, and their ternary matrix product approximates the original matrix. TMF has applications in 1) finding targeted structure in ternary data, 2) imputing values through pattern-discovery in highly-incomplete categorical data sets, and 3) solving instances of its encapsulated Binary Matrix Factorization (BMF) problem. Our elegant algorithm Faster (Fast Ternary Matrix Factorization) has linear run-time complexity with respect to the dimensions of the data set and is parameter-robust. Experiments on synthetic and real-world data sets show that we are able to efficiently and effectively outperform state-of-the-art techniques in all three TMF applications. Samuel Maurus, Claudia Plant |
ICDM | 1 |