Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Julia Thaele

dblp:160/5964 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › pattern mining › subgroup discovery
exceptional model mining
0.212014
Understanding Where Your Classifier Does (Not) Work - The SCaPE Model Class for EMM · ICDM 2014
Data mining
pattern mining
0.212014
Understanding Where Your Classifier Does (Not) Work - The SCaPE Model Class for EMM · ICDM 2014
Data mining › pattern mining
subgroup discovery
0.212014
Understanding Where Your Classifier Does (Not) Work - The SCaPE Model Class for EMM · ICDM 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ranking loss · 0.2monte carlo simulation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Understanding Where Your Classifier Does (Not) Work
Wouter Duivesteijn, Julia Thaele
ECML/PKDD (3)2
2014 Understanding Where Your Classifier Does (Not) Work - The SCaPE Model Class for EMM
abstract
FACT, the First G-APD Cherenkov Telescope, detects air showers induced by high-energetic cosmic particles. It is desirable to classify a shower as being induced by a gamma ray or a background particle. Generally, it is nontrivial to get any feedback on the real-life training task, but we can attempt to understand how our classifier works by investigating its performance on Monte Carlo simulated data. To this end, in this paper we develop the SCaPE (Soft Classifier Performance Evaluation) model class for Exceptional Model Mining, which is a Local Pattern Mining framework devoted to highlighting unusual interplay between multiple targets. In our Monte Carlo simulated data, we take as targets the computed classifier probabilities and the binary column containing the ground truth: which kind of particle induced the corresponding shower. Using a newly developed quality measure based on ranking loss, the SCaPE model class highlights subspaces of the search space where the classifier performs particularly well or poorly. These subspaces arrive in terms of conditions on attributes of the data, hence they come in a language a domain expert understands, which should aid him in understanding where his/her classifier does (not) work. Found subgroups highlight subspaces whose difficulty for classification is corroborated by astrophysical interpretation, as well as subspaces that warrant further investigation.
Wouter Duivesteijn, Julia Thaele
ICDM2