Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Gruver

dblp:160/9906 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 91% Motion planning and robot control · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
plan robustness
0.212015
Robustness in Probabilistic Temporal Planning · AAAI 2015
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › temporal planning
probabilistic temporal planning
0.212015
Robustness in Probabilistic Temporal Planning · AAAI 2015
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
temporal planning
0.212015
Robustness in Probabilistic Temporal Planning · AAAI 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
multi-robot planning
0.112015
Robustness in Probabilistic Temporal Planning · AAAI 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

scheduling optimization · 0.2probabilistic modeling · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Robustness in Probabilistic Temporal Planning
abstract
Flexibility in agent scheduling increases the resilience of temporal plans in the face of new constraints. However,current metrics of flexibility ignore domain knowledge about how such constraints might arise in practice, e.g., due to the uncertain duration of a robot’s transitiontime from one location to another. Probabilistic temporalplanning accounts for actions whose uncertain durations can be modeled with probability density functions. We introduce a new metric called robustness that measures the likelihood of success for probabilistic temporalplans. We show empirically that in multi-robot planning,robustness may be a better metric for assessing the quality of temporal plans than flexibility, thus reframing many popular scheduling optimization problems.
Jeb Brooks, Emilia Reed, Alexander Gruver, Jim Boerkoel
AAAI3