Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hiromasa Arai

dblp:160/9931 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 68% Algorithms and data structures · 32%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
heuristic search
0.522016
Weighted A* Algorithms for Unsupervised Feature Selection with Provable Bounds on Suboptimality · AAAI 2016
Unsupervised Feature Selection by Heuristic Search with Provable Bounds on Suboptimality · AAAI 2016
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search
weighted a
0.522016
Weighted A* Algorithms for Unsupervised Feature Selection with Provable Bounds on Suboptimality · AAAI 2016
Unsupervised Feature Selection by Heuristic Search with Provable Bounds on Suboptimality · AAAI 2016
Mathematical optimization › sparse learning
feature selection
0.522016
Weighted A* Algorithms for Unsupervised Feature Selection with Provable Bounds on Suboptimality · AAAI 2016
Unsupervised Feature Selection by Heuristic Search with Provable Bounds on Suboptimality · AAAI 2016
Algorithms and data structures › search algorithms › heuristic search
a* search
0.212015
Optimal Column Subset Selection by A-Star Search · AAAI 2015
Algorithms and data structures › matrix approximation
column subset selection
0.212015
Optimal Column Subset Selection by A-Star Search · AAAI 2015
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.212015
Optimal Column Subset Selection by A-Star Search · AAAI 2015
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.212015
Optimal Column Subset Selection by A-Star Search · AAAI 2015
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.112015
Optimal Column Subset Selection by A-Star Search · AAAI 2015
Data mining › dimensionality reduction › feature selection
unsupervised feature selection
0.112015
Optimal Column Subset Selection by A-Star Search · AAAI 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weighted a* · 1.0heuristic search · 1.0a* search · 0.9eigenvalue-based heuristic · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Two-Stage Feature Selection with Unsupervised Second Stage
abstract
A common technique for reducing the running time of feature selection is to perform it in two stages. In the first stage a fast and simple filter is applied to select good candidates. The number of candidates is further reduced in the second stage by an accurate algorithm that may run significantly slower. It is common to distinguish between supervised and unsupervised feature selection. In the supervised case features are selected for predicting a set of labels. Such label information is not used in the unsupervised case. We describe a general framework that can use an arbitrary off-the-shelf unsupervised algorithm for the second stage. The algorithm is applied to the selection obtained in the first stage weighted appropriately. Our main technical result is the computation of these weights. We show that the weights can be found as the solution to a quadratic optimization problem. The solution is deterministic, and improves on previously published studies that use probabilistic ideas to compute the weights. To the best of our knowledge our approach is the first technique for converting a supervised feature selection problem into an unsupervised problem. Complexity analysis shows that the proposed technique is very fast, can be implemented in a single pass over the data, and can take advantage of data sparsity. Experimental results show its accuracy to be comparable to that of much slower techniques.
Hiromasa Arai, Crystal Maung, Haim Schweitzer
ICTAI2
2016 Unsupervised Feature Selection by Heuristic Search with Provable Bounds on Suboptimality
abstract
Identifying a small number of features that can represent the data is a known problem that comes up in areas such as machine learning, knowledge representation, data mining, and numerical linear algebra. Computing an optimal solution is believed to be NP-hard, and there is extensive work on approximation algorithms. Classic approaches exploit the algebraic structure of the underlying matrix, while more recent approaches use randomization. An entirely different approach that uses the A* heuristic search algorithm to find an optimal solution was recently proposed. Not surprisingly it is limited to effectively selecting only a small number of features. We propose a similar approach related to the Weighted A* algorithm. This gives algorithms that are not guaranteed to find an optimal solution but run much faster than the A* approach, enabling effective selection of many features from large datasets. We demonstrate experimentally that these new algorithms are more accurate than the current state-of-the-art while still being practical. Furthermore, they come with an adjustable guarantee on how different their error may be from the smallest possible (optimal) error. Their accuracy can always be increased at the expense of a longer running time.
Hiromasa Arai, Crystal Maung, Haim Schweitzer
AAAI1
2016 Weighted A* Algorithms for Unsupervised Feature Selection with Provable Bounds on Suboptimality
abstract
Identifying a small number of features that can represent the data is believed to be NP-hard. Previous approaches exploit algebraic structure and use randomization. We propose an algorithm based on ideas similar to the Weighted A* algorithm in heuristic search. Our experiments show this new algorithm to be more accurate than the current state of the art.
Hiromasa Arai, Crystal Maung, Haim Schweitzer
AAAI1
2015 Optimal Column Subset Selection by A-Star Search
abstract
Approximating a matrix by a small subset of its columns is a known problem in numerical linear algebra. Algorithms that address this problem have been used in areas which include, among others, sparse approximation, unsupervised feature selection, data mining, and knowledge representation. Such algorithms were investigated since the 1960's, with recent results that use randomization. The problem is believed to be NP-Hard, and to the best of our knowledge there are no previously published algorithms aimed at computing optimal solutions. We show how to model the problem as a graph search, and propose a heuristic based on eigenvalues of related matrices. Applying the A* search strategy with this heuristic is guaranteed to find the optimal solution. Experimental results on common datasets show that the proposed algorithm can effectively select columns from moderate size matrices, typically improving by orders of magnitude the run time of exhaustive search. We also show how to combine the proposed algorithm with other non-optimal (but much faster) algorithms in a ``two stage'' framework, which is guaranteed to improve the accuracy of the other algorithms.
Hiromasa Arai, Crystal Maung, Haim Schweitzer
AAAI1