Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ujjwal Das Gupta

dblp:160/9947 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 56% Trustworthy machine learning · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable reinforcement learning
decision tree policy
0.212015
Policy Tree: Adaptive Representation for Policy Gradient · AAAI 2015
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient
0.212015
Policy Tree: Adaptive Representation for Policy Gradient · AAAI 2015
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value function approximation
0.112015
Policy Tree: Adaptive Representation for Policy Gradient · AAAI 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

policy gradient · 0.2decision tree growing · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Policy Tree: Adaptive Representation for Policy Gradient
abstract
Much of the focus on finding good representations in reinforcement learning has been on learning complex non-linear predictors of value. Policy gradient algorithms, which directly represent the policy, often need fewer parameters to learn good policies. However, they typically employ a fixed parametric representation that may not be sufficient for complex domains. This paper introduces the Policy Tree algorithm, which can learn an adaptive representation of policy in the form of a decision tree over different instantiations of a base policy. Policy gradient is used both to optimize the parameters and to grow the tree by choosing splits that enable the maximum local increase in the expected return of the policy. Experiments show that this algorithm can choose genuinely helpful splits and significantly improve upon the commonly used linear Gibbs softmax policy, which we choose as our base policy.
Ujjwal Das Gupta, Erin Talvitie, Michael H. Bowling
AAAI1