Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jonathan Rosenthal
dblp:160/9953
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0004-5586-2684ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 50% Concurrent programming · 50% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Approximation and online algorithms · 50% Algorithms and data structures · 50% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Security and privacy of machine learning › model stealing
data-free model stealing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DisGUIDE: Disagreement-Guided Data-Free Model Extraction · AAAI 2023 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
model stealing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DisGUIDE: Disagreement-Guided Data-Free Model Extraction · AAAI 2023 |
Software testing
deep learning testing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Problems and Opportunities in Training Deep Learning Software Systems: An Analysis of Variance · ASE 2020 |
Concurrent programming › concurrency models
nondeterminism |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Problems and Opportunities in Training Deep Learning Software Systems: An Analysis of Variance · ASE 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures › learning algorithms
incremental learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | The Boundary Forest Algorithm for Online Supervised and Unsupervised Learning · AAAI 2015 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | The Boundary Forest Algorithm for Online Supervised and Unsupervised Learning · AAAI 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
generative model · 0.7experience replay · 0.7diversity loss · 0.7disagreement loss · 0.7ensemble methods · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | DisGUIDE: Disagreement-Guided Data-Free Model ExtractionabstractRecent model-extraction attacks on Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) systems have moved towards data-free approaches, showing the feasibility of stealing models trained with difficult-to-access data. However, these attacks are ineffective or limited due to the low accuracy of extracted models and the high number of queries to the models under attack. The high query cost makes such techniques infeasible for online MLaaS systems that charge per query. We create a novel approach to get higher accuracy and query efficiency than prior data-free model extraction techniques. Specifically, we introduce a novel generator training scheme that maximizes the disagreement loss between two clone models that attempt to copy the model under attack. This loss, combined with diversity loss and experience replay, enables the generator to produce better instances to train the clone models. Our evaluation on popular datasets CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 shows that our approach improves the final model accuracy by up to 3.42% and 18.48% respectively. The average number of queries required to achieve the accuracy of the prior state of the art is reduced by up to 64.95%. We hope this will promote future work on feasible data-free model extraction and defenses against such attacks. Jonathan Rosenthal, Eric Enouen, Hung Viet Pham, Lin Tan 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Problems and Opportunities in Training Deep Learning Software Systems: An Analysis of VarianceabstractDeep learning (DL) training algorithms utilize nondeterminism to improve models' accuracy and training efficiency. Hence, multiple identical training runs (e.g., identical training data, algorithm, and network) produce different models with different accuracies and training times. In addition to these algorithmic factors, DL libraries (e.g., TensorFlow and cuDNN) introduce additional variance (referred to as implementation-level variance) due to parallelism, optimization, and floating-point computation. Hung Viet Pham, Shangshu Qian, Jiannan Wang 0002, Thibaud Lutellier, Jonathan Rosenthal, Lin Tan 0001, Yaoliang Yu, Nachiappan Nagappan |
ASE | 5 |
| 2015 | The Boundary Forest Algorithm for Online Supervised and Unsupervised LearningabstractWe describe a new instance-based learning algorithm called the Boundary Forest (BF) algorithm, that can be used for supervised and unsupervised learning. The al- gorithm builds a forest of trees whose nodes store previ- ously seen examples. It can be shown data points one at a time and updates itself incrementally, hence it is nat- urally online. Few instance-based algorithms have this property while being simultaneously fast, which the BF is. This is crucial for applications where one needs to respond to input data in real time. The number of chil- dren of each node is not set beforehand but obtained from the training procedure, which makes the algorithm very flexible with regards to what data manifolds it can learn. We test its generalization performance and speed on a range of benchmark datasets and detail in which settings it outperforms the state of the art. Empirically we find that training time scales as O(DN log(N )) and testing as O(Dlog(N)), where D is the dimensionality and N the amount of data. Charles Mathy, Nate Derbinsky, José Bento 0001, Jonathan Rosenthal, Jonathan S. Yedidia |
AAAI | 4 |