Faster and cheaper computers have been constantly demanding technological and architectural improvements. However, current technology is suffering from three technology walls: leakage wall, reliability wall, and cost wall. Meanwhile, existing architecture performance is also saturating due to three well-known architecture walls: memory wall, power wall, and instruction-level parallelism (ILP) wall. Hence, a lot of novel technologies and architectures have been introduced and developed intensively. Our previous work has presented a comprehensive classification and broad overview of memory-centric computer architectures. In this article, we aim to discuss the most important classes of memory-centric architectures thoroughly and evaluate their advantages and disadvantages. Moreover, for each class, the article provides a comprehensive survey on memory-centric architectures available in the literature.

A novel type of hardware accelerators called automata processors (APs) have been proposed to accelerate finite-state automata. The bone structure of an AP is a hierarchical routing matrix that connects many memory arrays. With this structure, an AP can process an input symbol every clock cycle, and hence achieve much higher performance compared to conventional architectures. However, the design automation for the APs is not well researched. This article proposes a fully automated tool namedAPmapfor mapping the automata to APs that use a two-level routing matrix. APmap first partitions a large automaton into small graphs and then maps them. Multiple transformations are applied to the automaton by APmap to meet hardware constraints. The experiments on a standard benchmark suite show that our approach leads to around 19% less storage utilization compared to state-of-the-art.

Conventional computing architectures and the CMOS technology that they are based on are facing major challenges such as the memory bottleneck making the memory access for data transfer a major killer of energy and performance. Computation-in-memory (CIM) paradigm is seen as a potential alternative that could alleviate such problems by adding computational resources to the memory, and significantly reducing the communication. Memristive devices are promising enablers of a such CIM paradigm, as they are able to support both storage and computing. This paper shows the power of memristive device based CIM paradigm in enabling new efficient application-specific architectures as well as efficient implementations of some known domain-specific architectures. In addition, the paper discusses the potential applications that could benefit from such paradigm and highlights the major challenges.

Technological and architectural improvements have been constantly required to sustain the demand of faster and cheaper computers. However, CMOS down-scaling is suffering from three technology walls: leakage wall, reliability wall, and cost wall. On top of that, a performance increase due to architectural improvements is also gradually saturating due to three well-known architecture walls: memory wall, power wall, and instruction-level parallelism (ILP) wall. Hence, a lot of research is focusing on proposing and developing new technologies and architectures. In this article, we present a comprehensive classification of memory-centric computing architectures; it is based on three metrics: computation location, level of parallelism, and used memory technology. The classification not only provides an overview of existing architectures with their pros and cons but also unifies the terminology that uniquely identifies these architectures and highlights the potential future architectures that can be further explored. Hence, it sets up a direction for future research in the field.

Today's computing architectures and device technologies are unable to meet the increasingly stringent demands on energy and performance posed by emerging applications. Therefore, alternative computing architectures are being explored that leverage novel post-CMOS device technologies. One of these is a Computation-in-Memory architecture based on memristive devices. This paper describes the concept of such an architecture and shows different applications that could significantly benefit from it. For each application, the algorithm, the architecture, the primitive operations, and the potential benefits are presented. The applications cover the domains of data analytics, signal processing, and machine learning.

Automata Processor (AP) is a special implementation of non-deterministic finite automata that performs pattern matching by exploring parallel state transitions. The implementation typically contains a hierarchical switching network, causing long latency. This paper proposes a methodology to split such a hierarchical switching network into multiple pipelined stages, making it possible to process several input sequences in parallel by using time-division multiplexing. We use a new resistive RAM based AP (instead of known DRAM or SRAM based) to illustrate the potential of our method. The experimental results show that our approach increases the throughput by almost a factor of 2 at a cost of marginal area overhead.

Emerging computing applications (such as big-data and Internet-of-things) are extremely demanding in terms of storage, energy and computational efficiency, while todays architectures and device technologies are facing major challenges making them incapable to meet these demands. Computation-in-Memory (CIM) architecture based on memristive devices is one of the alternative computing architectures being explored to address these limitations. Enabling such architectures relies on the development of efficient memristive circuits being able to perform logic and arithmetic operations within the non-volatile memory core. This paper addresses memristive circuit designs for CIM architectures. It gives a complete overview of all designs, both for logic as well as arithmetic operations, and presents the most popular designs in details. In addition, it analyzes and classifies them, shows how they result in different CIM flavours and how these architectures distinguish themselves from traditional ones. The paper also presents different potential applications that could significantly benefit from CIM architectures, based on their kernel that could be accelerated.

CMOS technology and its continuous scaling have made electronics and computers accessible and affordable for almost everyone on the globe; in addition, they have enabled the solutions of a wide range of societal problems and applications. Today, however, both the technology and the computer architectures are facing severe challenges/walls making them incapable of providing the demanded computing power with tight constraints. This motivates the need for the exploration of novel architectures based on new device technologies; not only to sustain the financial benefit of technology scaling, but also to develop solutions for extremely demanding emerging applications. This paper presents two computation-in-memory based accelerators making use of emerging memristive devices; they are Memristive Vector Processor and RRAM Automata Processor. The preliminary results of these two accelerators show significant improvement in terms of latency, energy and area as compared to today's architectures and design.

Alternatives to CMOS logic circuit implementations are under research for future scaled electronics. Memristor crossbar-based logic circuit is one of the promising candidates to at least partially replace CMOS technology, which is facing many challenges such as reduced scalability, reliability, and performance gain. Memristor crossbar offers many advantages including scalability, high integration density, nonvolatility, etc. The state-of-the-art for memristor crossbar logic circuit design can only implement simple and small circuits. This paper proposes a mapping methodology of large Boolean logic circuits on memristor crossbar. Appropriate place-and-route schemes, to efficiently map the circuits on the crossbar, as well as several optimization schemes are also proposed. To illustrate the potential of the methodology, a multibit adder and other nine more complex benchmarks are studied; the delay, area and power consumption induced by both crossbar and its CMOS control part are evaluated.

As today's CMOS technology is scaling down to its physical limits, it suffers from major challenges such as increased leakage power and reduced reliability. Novel technologies, such as memristors, nanotube, and graphene transistors, are under research as alternatives. Among these technologies, memristor is a promising candidate due to its great scalability, high integration density and near-zero standby power. However, memristor-based logic circuits are facing robustness challenges mainly due to improper values of design parameters (e.g., OFF/ON ratio, control voltages). Moreover, process variation, sneak path currents and parasitic resistance of nanowires also impact the robustness. To realize a robust design, this paper formulates proper constraints for design parameters to guarantee correct functionality of logic gates (e.g., AND). Our proposal is verified with SPICE simulations while taking both device variation and parasitic effects into account. It is observed that the errors due to analytical parameter constraints are typically within 4.5% as compared to simulations.

Traditional CMOS technology and its continuous down-scaling have been the driving force to improve performance of existing computer architectures. Today, however, both technology and computer architectures are facing challenges that make them incapable of delivering the growing computing performance requirement at pre-defined constraints. This forces the exploration of both novel architectures and technologies; not only to maintain the economic profit of technology scaling, but also to enable the computing architecture solutions for big-data and data-intensive applications. This paper discusses the emerging memristive device as a complement (or an alternative) to CMOS devices and shows how such devices enable novel computing paradigms that will solve the challenges of today's architectures for certain applications. The paper covers not only the potential of memristor devices in enabling novel memory technologies, logic design styles, and arithmetic operations, but also their potential in enabling in-memory computing and neuromorphic computing.

Today's computer architectures suffer from many challenges, such as the near end of CMOS downscaling, the memory/communication bottleneck, the power wall, and the programming complexity. As a consequence, these architectures become inefficient in solving big data problems or general data intensive applications. Computation-in-memory (CIM) is a novel architecture that tries to solve/alleviate the impact of these challenges using the same device (i.e., the memristor) to implement the processor and memory in the same physical crossbar. In order to analyze its feasibility in depth, this paper proposes two memristor implementations of a data intensive arithmetic application (i.e., parallel addition). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper that considers the cost of the entire architecture including both crossbar and its CMOS controller. The results show that CIM architecture in general and the CIM parallel adder in particular have a high scalability. CIM parallel adder achieves at least two orders of magnitude improvement in energy and area in comparison with a multicore-based parallel adder. Moreover, due to a wide variety of memristor design methods (such as Boolean logic), tradeoffs can be made between the area, delay, and energy consumption.

As the CMOS technology is gradually scaling down to inherent physical device limits, significant challenges emerge related to scalability, leakage, reliability, etc. Alternative technologies are under research for next-generation VLSI circuits. Memristor is one of the promising candidates due to its scalability, practically zero leakage, non-volatility, etc. This paper proposes a novel design methodology for logic circuits targeting memristor crossbars. This methodology allows the optimization of the design of logic function, and their automatic mapping on the memristor crossbar. More important, this methodology supports the execution of Boolean logic functions within constant number of steps independent of its functionality. To illustrate the potential of the proposed methodology, multi-bit adders and multipliers are explored; their incurred delay, area and energy costs are analyzed. The comparison of our approach with state-of-the-art Boolean logic circuits for memristor crossbar architecture shows significant improvement in both delay (4 to 500 x) and energy consumption (1.22 to 3.71 x). The area overhead may decrease (down to 44%) or increase (up to 17%) depending on the circuit's functionality and logic optimization level.