We present a new flow-based formulation for identical parallel machine scheduling with a regular objective function and without idle time. The formulation is constructed with the help of a decision diagram that represents all job sequences that respect specific ordering rules. These rules rely on a partition of the planning horizon into, generally nonuniform, periods and do not exclude all optimal solutions, but they constrain solutions to adhere to a canonical form. The new formulation has numerous variables and constraints, and hence we apply a Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition to compute the linear programming relaxation in reasonable time; the resulting lower bound is stronger than the bound from the classical time-indexed formulation. We develop a branch-and-price framework that solves three instances from the literature for the first time. We compare the new formulation with the time-indexed and arc time–indexed formulation by means of a series of computational experiments. History: Accepted by Andrea Lodi, Area Editor for Design & Analysis of Algorithms—Discrete. Funding: This work was partially funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under [Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant 754462]. Supplemental Material: The software that supports the findings of this study is available within the paper and its Supplemental Information ( https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/suppl/10.1287/ijoc.2022.0301 ) as well as from the IJOC GitHub software repository ( https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2022.0301 ). The complete IJOC Software and Data Repository is available at https://informsjoc.github.io/ .

We study the parallel machine scheduling problem to minimize the sum of the weighted completion times of the jobs to be scheduled (problem Pm∥∑wj Cj in the standard three-field notation). We use the set covering formulation that was introduced by van den Akker et al. [van den Akker J, Hoogeveen J, van de Velde S (1999) Parallel machine scheduling by column generation. Oper. Res. 47(6):862–872.] for this problem, and we improve the computational performance of their branch-and-price (B&P) algorithm by a number of techniques, including a different generic branching scheme, zero-suppressed binary decision diagrams (ZDDs) to solve the pricing problem, dual-price smoothing as a stabilization method, and Farkas pricing to handle infeasibilities. We report computational results that show the effectiveness of the algorithmic enhancements, which depends on the characteristics of the instances. To the best of our knowledge, we are also the first to use ZDDs to solve the pricing problem in a B&P algorithm for a scheduling problem. The online supplement is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2018.0809 .