Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vernell S. Williamson

dblp:161/3008 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome-wide association study
0.732016
JEPEGMIX: gene-level joint analysis of functional SNPs in cosmopolitan cohorts · Bioinform. 2016
JEPEG: a summary statistics based tool for gene-level joint testing of functional variants · Bioinform. 2015
DISTMIX: direct imputation of summary statistics for unmeasured SNPs from mixed ethnicity cohorts · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › association testing
gene-level association testing
0.522016
JEPEGMIX: gene-level joint analysis of functional SNPs in cosmopolitan cohorts · Bioinform. 2016
JEPEG: a summary statistics based tool for gene-level joint testing of functional variants · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › genome-wide association study
summary statistic imputation
0.212015
DISTMIX: direct imputation of summary statistics for unmeasured SNPs from mixed ethnicity cohorts · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › genetic study design
mixed ethnicity cohort analysis
0.122016
JEPEGMIX: gene-level joint analysis of functional SNPs in cosmopolitan cohorts · Bioinform. 2016
DISTMIX: direct imputation of summary statistics for unmeasured SNPs from mixed ethnicity cohorts · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics
eQTL mapping
0.112015
JEPEG: a summary statistics based tool for gene-level joint testing of functional variants · Bioinform. 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

summary statistics imputation · 0.5linkage disequilibrium estimation · 0.2reference panel-based imputation · 0.2joint effect testing · 0.2conditional expectation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 JEPEGMIX: gene-level joint analysis of functional SNPs in cosmopolitan cohorts
abstract
MOTIVATION: To increase detection power, gene level analysis methods are used to aggregate weak signals. To greatly increase computational efficiency, most methods use as input summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Subsequently, gene statistics are constructed using linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns from a relevant reference panel. However, all methods, including our own Joint Effect on Phenotype of eQTL/functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with a Gene (JEPEG), assume homogeneous panels, e.g. European. However, this renders these tools unsuitable for the analysis of large cosmopolitan cohorts. RESULTS: We propose a JEPEG extension, JEPEGMIX, which similar to one of our software tools, Direct Imputation of summary STatistics of unmeasured SNPs from MIXed ethnicity cohorts, is capable of estimating accurate LD patterns for cosmopolitan cohorts. JEPEGMIX uses this accurate LD estimates to (i) impute the summary statistics at unmeasured functional variants and (ii) test for the joint effect of all measured and imputed functional variants which are associated with a gene. We illustrate the performance of our tool by analyzing the GWAS meta-analysis summary statistics from the multi-ethnic Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Schizophrenia stage 2 cohort. This practical application supports the immune system being one of the main drivers of the process leading to schizophrenia. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Software, annotation database and examples are available at http://dleelab.github.io/jepegmix/. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary material is available at Bioinformatics online.
Donghyung Lee, Vernell S. Williamson, T. Bernard Bigdeli, Brien P. Riley, Bradley Todd Webb, Ayman H. Fanous, Kenneth S. Kendler, Vladimir I. Vladimirov, Silviu-Alin Bacanu
Bioinform.2
2015 DISTMIX: direct imputation of summary statistics for unmeasured SNPs from mixed ethnicity cohorts
abstract
MOTIVATION: To increase the signal resolution for large-scale meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies, genotypes at unmeasured single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are commonly imputed using large multi-ethnic reference panels. However, the ever increasing size and ethnic diversity of both reference panels and cohorts makes genotype imputation computationally challenging for moderately sized computer clusters. Moreover, genotype imputation requires subject-level genetic data, which unlike summary statistics provided by virtually all studies, is not publicly available. While there are much less demanding methods which avoid the genotype imputation step by directly imputing SNP statistics, e.g. Directly Imputing summary STatistics (DIST) proposed by our group, their implicit assumptions make them applicable only to ethnically homogeneous cohorts. RESULTS: To decrease computational and access requirements for the analysis of cosmopolitan cohorts, we propose DISTMIX, which extends DIST capabilities to the analysis of mixed ethnicity cohorts. The method uses a relevant reference panel to directly impute unmeasured SNP statistics based only on statistics at measured SNPs and estimated/user-specified ethnic proportions. Simulations show that the proposed method adequately controls the Type I error rates. The 1000 Genomes panel imputation of summary statistics from the ethnically diverse Psychiatric Genetic Consortium Schizophrenia Phase 2 suggests that, when compared to genotype imputation methods, DISTMIX offers comparable imputation accuracy for only a fraction of computational resources. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: DISTMIX software, its reference population data, and usage examples are publicly available at http://code.google.com/p/distmix. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary Data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Donghyung Lee, T. Bernard Bigdeli, Vernell S. Williamson, Vladimir I. Vladimirov, Brien P. Riley, Ayman H. Fanous, Silviu-Alin Bacanu
Bioinform.3
2015 JEPEG: a summary statistics based tool for gene-level joint testing of functional variants
abstract
MOTIVATION: Gene expression is influenced by variants commonly known as expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL). On the basis of this fact, researchers proposed to use eQTL/functional information univariately for prioritizing single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) signals from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, most genes are influenced by multiple eQTLs which, thus, jointly affect any downstream phenotype. Therefore, when compared with the univariate prioritization approach, a joint modeling of eQTL action on phenotypes has the potential to substantially increase signal detection power. Nonetheless, a joint eQTL analysis is impeded by (i) not measuring all eQTLs in a gene and/or (ii) lack of access to individual genotypes. RESULTS: We propose joint effect on phenotype of eQTL/functional SNPs associated with a gene (JEPEG), a novel software tool which uses only GWAS summary statistics to (i) impute the summary statistics at unmeasured eQTLs and (ii) test for the joint effect of all measured and imputed eQTLs in a gene. We illustrate the behavior/performance of the developed tool by analysing the GWAS meta-analysis summary statistics from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Stage 1 and the Genetic Consortium for Anorexia Nervosa. CONCLUSIONS: Applied analyses results suggest that JEPEG complements commonly used univariate GWAS tools by: (i) increasing signal detection power via uncovering (a) novel genes or (b) known associated genes in smaller cohorts and (ii) assisting in fine-mapping of challenging regions, e.g. major histocompatibility complex for schizophrenia. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: JEPEG, its associated database of eQTL SNPs and usage examples are publicly available at http://code.google.com/p/jepeg/. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Donghyung Lee, Vernell S. Williamson, T. Bernard Bigdeli, Brien P. Riley, Ayman H. Fanous, Vladimir I. Vladimirov, Silviu-Alin Bacanu
Bioinform.2
2013 Detecting miRNAs in deep-sequencing data: a software performance comparison and evaluation
abstract
Deep sequencing has become a popular tool for novel miRNA detection but its data must be viewed carefully as the state of the field is still undeveloped. Using three different programs, miRDeep (v1, 2), miRanalyzer and DSAP, we have analyzed seven data sets (six biological and one simulated) to provide a critical evaluation of the programs performance. We selected these software based on their popularity and overall approach toward the detection of novel and known miRNAs using deep-sequencing data. The program comparisons suggest that, despite differing stringency levels they all identify a similar set of known and novel predictions. Comparisons between the first and second version of miRDeep suggest that the stringency level of each of these programs may, in fact, be a result of the algorithm used to map the reads to the target. Different stringency levels are likely to affect the number of possible novel candidates for functional verification, causing undue strain on resources and time. With that in mind, we propose that an intersection across multiple programs be taken, especially if considering novel candidates that will be targeted for additional analysis. Using this approach, we identify and performed initial validation of 12 novel predictions in our in-house data with real-time PCR, six of which have been previously unreported.
Vernell S. Williamson, Albert Kim, Bin Xie 0004, G. Omari McMichael, Vladimir I. Vladimirov
Briefings Bioinform.1