VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vince Lyzinski
dblp:161/7641
· DBLP profile ↗
17ranked-venue papers
7as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-5594-8956ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 5 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Graph learning · 30% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 29% Representation and self-supervised learning · 23% | |
| Theoretical computer science
7 papers |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 73% Mathematical optimization · 16% Information theory · 11% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 64% Information retrieval · 36% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph matching |
1.3 | 5 | 2020 | Matched Filters for Noisy Induced Subgraph Detection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020 Information Recovery in Shuffled Graphs via Graph Matching · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018 Graph Matching: Relax at Your Own Risk · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2016 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
network embedding |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Detection of Model-Based Planted Pseudo-Cliques in Random Dot Product Graphs by the Adjacency Spectral Embedding and the Graph Encoder Embedding · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning › geometric embedding
spectral embedding |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Detection of Model-Based Planted Pseudo-Cliques in Random Dot Product Graphs by the Adjacency Spectral Embedding and the Graph Encoder Embedding · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › relational model
statistical network models |
0.7 | 3 | 2019 | On Consistent Vertex Nomination Schemes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 On the Consistency of the Likelihood Maximization Vertex Nomination Scheme: Bridging the Gap Between Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Graph Matching · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 Seeded graph matching for correlated Erdös-Rényi graphs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph matching
graph alignment |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Matched Filters for Noisy Induced Subgraph Detection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › bayesian learning theory
bayes optimality |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On Consistent Vertex Nomination Schemes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
statistical consistency |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On Consistent Vertex Nomination Schemes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 |
Information theory › information measures
mutual information |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Information Recovery in Shuffled Graphs via Graph Matching · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › random graph models
random dot product graph |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Detection of Model-Based Planted Pseudo-Cliques in Random Dot Product Graphs by the Adjacency Spectral Embedding and the Graph Encoder Embedding · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › relational model › random graph model
random dot product graph |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Statistical Inference on Random Dot Product Graphs: a Survey · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Statistical Inference on Random Dot Product Graphs: a Survey · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
High-performance computing › sparse linear algebra
sparse matrix computation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Semi-External Memory Sparse Matrix Multiplication for Billion-Node Graphs · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2017 |
High-performance computing › sparse linear algebra
sparse matrix multiplication |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Semi-External Memory Sparse Matrix Multiplication for Billion-Node Graphs · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2017 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
stochastic block model |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | On the Consistency of the Likelihood Maximization Vertex Nomination Scheme: Bridging the Gap Between Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Graph Matching · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Mathematical optimization
convex relaxation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Graph Matching: Relax at Your Own Risk · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2016 |
Mathematical optimization
relaxation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Graph Matching: Relax at Your Own Risk · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2016 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph matching › graph alignment
seeded graph matching |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Seeded graph matching for correlated Erdös-Rényi graphs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | On Consistent Vertex Nomination Schemes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 |
Data mining › clustering
graph clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Information Recovery in Shuffled Graphs via Graph Matching · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018 |
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › community detection
stochastic block model |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Information Recovery in Shuffled Graphs via Graph Matching · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis
large-scale graph analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Semi-External Memory Sparse Matrix Multiplication for Billion-Node Graphs · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2017 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph matching |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Graph Matching: Relax at Your Own Risk · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational graph autoencoder · 2.0graph encoder embedding · 2.0adjacency spectral embedding · 2.0bayes optimal classification · 0.8phase transition analysis · 0.7information-theoretic analysis · 0.7restricted-focus maximum likelihood · 0.5maximum likelihood estimation · 0.5optimization · 0.4matched filter · 0.4adjacency matrix centering and padding · 0.4indefinite relaxation · 0.2gradient descent · 0.2convex relaxation · 0.2seeded graph matching · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Detection of Model-Based Planted Pseudo-Cliques in Random Dot Product Graphs by the Adjacency Spectral Embedding and the Graph Encoder EmbeddingabstractIn this article, we explore the capability of both the Adjacency Spectral Embedding (ASE) and the Graph Encoder Embedding (GEE) for capturing an embedded pseudo-clique structure in the random dot product graph setting. In both theory and experiments, we demonstrate that, in the absence of additional clean (i.e., without the implanted pseudo-clique) network data, this pairing of model and methods can yield worse results than the best existing spectral clique detection methods. However, these methods can be used to asymptotically localize the pseudo-cliques if additional clean, independent network data is provided. This demonstrates at once the methods' potential ability/inability to capture modestly sized pseudo-cliques and the methods' robustness to the model contamination giving rise to the pseudo-clique structure. To further enrich our analysis, we also consider the Variational Graph Auto-Encoder (VGAE) model in our simulation and real data experiments. Tong Qi, Vince Lyzinski |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2022 | The Importance of Being Correlated: Implications of Dependence in Joint Spectral Inference across Multiple NetworksabstractSpectral inference on multiple networks is a rapidly-developing subfield of graph statistics. Recent work has demonstrated that joint, or simultaneous, spectral embedding of multiple independent networks can deliver more accurate estimation than individual spectral decompositions of those same networks. Such inference procedures typically rely heavily on independence assumptions across the multiple network realizations, and even in this case, little attention has been paid to the induced network correlation that can be a consequence of such joint embeddings. In this paper, we present a generalized omnibus embedding methodology and we provide a detailed analysis of this embedding across both independent and correlated networks, the latter of which significantly extends the reach of such procedures, and we describe how this omnibus embedding can itself induce correlation. This leads us to distinguish betwee inherent correlation---that is, the correlation that arises naturally in multisample network data---and induced correlation, which is an artifice of the joint embedding methodology. We show that the generalized omnibus embedding procedure is flexible and robust, and we prove both consistency and a central limit theorem for the embedded points. We examine how induced and inherent correlation can impact inference for network time series data, and we provide network analogues of classical questions such as the effective sample size for more generally correlated data. Further, we show how an appropriately calibrated generalized omnibus embedding can detect changes in real biological networks that previous embedding procedures could not discern, confirming that the effect of inherent and induced correlation can be subtle and transformative. By allowing for and deconstructing both forms of correlation, our methodology widens the scope of spectral techniques for network inference, with import in theory and practice. Konstantinos Pantazis, Avanti Athreya, Jesús Arroyo 0001, William N. Frost, Evan S. Hill, Vince Lyzinski |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 6 |
| 2020 | Matched Filters for Noisy Induced Subgraph DetectionabstractThe problem of finding the vertex correspondence between two noisy graphs with different number of vertices where the smaller graph is still large has many applications in social networks, neuroscience, and computer vision. We propose a solution to this problem via a graph matching matched filter: centering and padding the smaller adjacency matrix and applying graph matching methods to align it to the larger network. The centering and padding schemes can be incorporated into any algorithm that matches using adjacency matrices. Under a statistical model for correlated pairs of graphs, which yields a noisy copy of the small graph within the larger graph, the resulting optimization problem can be guaranteed to recover the true vertex correspondence between the networks. However, there are currently no efficient algorithms for solving this problem. To illustrate the possibilities and challenges of such problems, we use an algorithm that can exploit a partially known correspondence and show via varied simulations and applications to Drosophila and human connectomes that this approach can achieve good performance. Daniel Lewis Sussman, Youngser Park, Carey E. Priebe, Vince Lyzinski |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 4 |
| 2019 | Multiplex graph matching matched filtersabstractWe consider the problem of detecting a noisy induced multiplex template network in a larger multiplex background network. Our approach, which extends the framework of [14] to the multiplex setting, leverages a multiplex analogue of the classical graph matching problem to use the template as a matched filter for efficiently searching the background for candidate template matches. The effectiveness of our approach is demonstrated both theoretically and empirically, with particular attention paid to the potential benefits of considering multiple channels. Konstantinos Pantazis, Daniel Lewis Sussman, Youngser Park, Carey E. Priebe, Vince Lyzinski |
IEEE BigData | 5 |
| 2019 | Neural variational entity set expansion for automatically populated knowledge graphs
Pushpendre Rastogi, Adam Poliak, Vince Lyzinski, Benjamin Van Durme |
Inf. Retr. J. | 3 |
| 2019 | On Consistent Vertex Nomination SchemesabstractGiven a vertex of interest in a network $G_1$, the vertex nomination problem seeks to find the corresponding vertex of interest (if it exists) in a second network $G_2$. A vertex nomination scheme produces a list of the vertices in $G_2$, ranked according to how likely they are judged to be the corresponding vertex of interest in $G_2$. The vertex nomination problem and related information retrieval tasks have attracted much attention in the machine learning literature, with numerous applications to social and biological networks. However, the current framework has often been confined to a comparatively small class of network models, and the concept of statistically consistent vertex nomination schemes has been only shallowly explored. In this paper, we extend the vertex nomination problem to a very general statistical model of graphs. Further, drawing inspiration from the long-established classification framework in the pattern recognition literature, we provide definitions for the key notions of Bayes optimality and consistency in our extended vertex nomination framework, including a derivation of the Bayes optimal vertex nomination scheme. In addition, we prove that no universally consistent vertex nomination schemes exist. Illustrative examples are provided throughout. Vince Lyzinski, Keith D. Levin, Carey E. Priebe |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2019 | Seeded graph matchingabstractGiven two graphs, the graph matching problem is to align the two vertex sets so as to minimize the number of adjacency disagreements between the two graphs. The seeded graph matching problem is the graph matching problem when we are first given a partial alignment that we are tasked with completing. In this article, we modify the state-of-the-art approximate graph matching algorithm “FAQ” of Vogelstein et al. (2015) to make it a fast approximate seeded graph matching algorithm, adapt its applicability to include graphs with differently sized vertex sets, and extend the algorithm so as to provide, for each individual vertex, a nomination list of likely matches. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm via simulation and real data experiments; indeed, knowledge of even a few seeds can be extremely effective when our seeded graph matching algorithm is used to recover a naturally existing alignment that is only partially observed. Donniell E. Fishkind, Sancar Adali, Heather G. Patsolic, Lingyao Meng, Digvijay Singh, Vince Lyzinski, Carey E. Priebe |
Pattern Recognit. | 6 |
| 2019 | Alignment strength and correlation for graphsabstractWhen two graphs have a correlated Bernoulli distribution, we prove that the alignment strength of their natural bijection strongly converges to a novel measure of graph correlation ϱT that neatly combines intergraph with intragraph distribution parameters. Within broad families of the random graph parameter settings, we illustrate that exact graph matching runtime and also matchability are both functions of ϱT, with thresholding behavior starkly illustrated in matchability. Donniell E. Fishkind, Lingyao Meng, Carey E. Priebe, Vince Lyzinski |
Pattern Recognit. Lett. | 5 |
| 2018 | Information Recovery in Shuffled Graphs via Graph MatchingabstractWhile many multiple graph inference methodologies operate under the implicit assumption that an explicit vertex correspondence is known across the vertex sets of the graphs, in practice these correspondences may only be partially or errorfully known. Herein, we provide an information theoretic foundation for understanding the practical impact that errorfully observed vertex correspondences can have on subsequent inference, and the capacity of graph matching methods to recover the lost vertex alignment and inferential performance. Working in the correlated stochastic blockmodel setting, we establish a duality between the loss of mutual information due to an errorfully observed vertex correspondence and the ability of graph matching algorithms to recover the true correspondence across graphs. In the process, we establish a phase transition for graph matchability in terms of the correlation across graphs, and we conjecture the analogous phase transition for the relative information loss due to shuffling vertex labels. We demonstrate the practical effect that graph shuffling-and matching-can have on subsequent inference, with examples from two sample graph hypothesis testing and joint spectral graph clustering. Vince Lyzinski |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2017 | Statistical Inference on Random Dot Product Graphs: a Survey
Avanti Athreya, Donniell E. Fishkind, Minh Tang, Carey E. Priebe, Youngser Park, Joshua T. Vogelstein, Keith D. Levin, Vince Lyzinski, Yichen Qin, Daniel Lewis Sussman |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 8 |
| 2017 | Scalable out-of-sample extension of graph embeddings using deep neural networks
Aren Jansen, Gregory Sell, Vince Lyzinski |
Pattern Recognit. Lett. | 3 |
| 2017 | Semi-External Memory Sparse Matrix Multiplication for Billion-Node GraphsabstractSparse matrix multiplication is traditionally performed in memory and scales to large matrices using the distributed memory of multiple nodes. In contrast, we scale sparse matrix multiplication beyond memory capacity by implementing sparse matrix dense matrix multiplication (SpMM) in a semi-external memory (SEM) fashion; i.e., we keep the sparse matrix on commodity SSDs and dense matrices in memory. Our SEM-SpMM incorporates many in-memory optimizations for large power-law graphs. It outperforms the in-memory implementations of Trilinos and Intel MKL and scales to billion-node graphs, far beyond the limitations of memory. Furthermore, on a single large parallel machine, our SEM-SpMM operates as fast as the distributed implementations of Trilinos using five times as much processing power. We also run our implementation in memory (IM-SpMM) to quantify the overhead of keeping data on SSDs. SEM-SpMM achieves almost 100 percent performance of IM-SpMM on graphs when the dense matrix has more than four columns; it achieves at least 65 percent performance of IM-SpMM on all inputs. We apply our SpMM to three important data analysis tasks-PageRank, eigensolving, and non-negative matrix factorization-and show that our SEM implementations significantly advance the state of the art. Da Zheng 0004, Disa Mhembere, Vince Lyzinski, Joshua T. Vogelstein, Carey E. Priebe, Randal C. Burns |
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. | 3 |
| 2016 | On the Consistency of the Likelihood Maximization Vertex Nomination Scheme: Bridging the Gap Between Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Graph MatchingabstractGiven a graph in which a few vertices are deemed interesting a priori, the vertex nomination task is to order the remaining vertices into a nomination list such that there is a concentration of interesting vertices at the top of the list. Previous work has yielded several approaches to this problem, with theoretical results in the setting where the graph is drawn from a stochastic block model (SBM), including a vertex nomination analogue of the Bayes optimal classifier. In this paper, we prove that maximum likelihood (ML)-based vertex nomination is consistent, in the sense that the performance of the ML-based scheme asymptotically matches that of the Bayes optimal scheme. We prove theorems of this form both when model parameters are known and unknown. Additionally, we introduce and prove consistency of a related, more scalable restricted-focus ML vertex nomination scheme. Finally, we incorporate vertex and edge features into ML-based vertex nomination and briefly explore the empirical effectiveness of this approach. Vince Lyzinski, Keith D. Levin, Donniell E. Fishkind, Carey E. Priebe |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2016 | Graph Matching: Relax at Your Own RiskabstractGraph matching-aligning a pair of graphs to minimize their edge disagreements-has received wide-spread attention from both theoretical and applied communities over the past several decades, including combinatorics, computer vision, and connectomics. Its attention can be partially attributed to its computational difficulty. Although many heuristics have previously been proposed in the literature to approximately solve graph matching, very few have any theoretical support for their performance. A common technique is to relax the discrete problem to a continuous problem, therefore enabling practitioners to bring gradient-descent-type algorithms to bear. We prove that an indefinite relaxation (when solved exactly) almost always discovers the optimal permutation, while a common convex relaxation almost always fails to discover the optimal permutation. These theoretical results suggest that initializing the indefinite algorithm with the convex optimum might yield improved practical performance. Indeed, experimental results illuminate and corroborate these theoretical findings, demonstrating that excellent results are achieved in both benchmark and real data problems by amalgamating the two approaches. Vince Lyzinski, Donniell E. Fishkind, Marcelo Fiori, Joshua T. Vogelstein, Carey E. Priebe, Guillermo Sapiro |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2015 | An evaluation of graph clustering methods for unsupervised term discoveryabstractUnsupervised term discovery (UTD) is the task of automatically identifying the repeated words and phrases in a collection of speech audio without relying on any language-specific resources. While the solution space for the task is far from fully explored, the dominant approach to date decomposes the discovery problem into two steps, where (i) segmental dynamic time warping is used to search the speech audio for repeated acoustic patterns, and (ii) these individual repetitions are partitioned into word/phrase categories using graph clustering. In this paper, we perform an unprecedented evaluation of a wide range of advanced graph clustering methods for the UTD task. We conduct our study in the evaluation framework of the Zero Resource Speech Challenge. We find that, for a range of features and languages, modularity-based clustering improves UTD performance most consistently, often by a wide margin. When paired with out-of-language deep neural net bottleneck features, we find performance near that of a high-resource UTD system. Vince Lyzinski, Gregory Sell, Aren Jansen |
INTERSPEECH | 1 |
| 2015 | Spectral clustering for divide-and-conquer graph matching
Vince Lyzinski, Daniel Lewis Sussman, Donniell E. Fishkind, Henry Pao, Joshua T. Vogelstein, Youngser Park, Carey E. Priebe |
Parallel Comput. | 1 |
| 2014 | Seeded graph matching for correlated Erdös-Rényi graphs
Vince Lyzinski, Donniell E. Fishkind, Carey E. Priebe |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |