Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cristina Butucea

dblp:161/9518 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Information theory · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
local differential privacy
0.922021
Locally differentially private estimation of functionals of discrete distributions · NeurIPS 2021
Locally private non-asymptotic testing of discrete distributions is faster using interactive mechanisms · NeurIPS 2020
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.512021
Locally differentially private estimation of functionals of discrete distributions · NeurIPS 2021
Information theory › statistical inference
distribution estimation
0.512021
Locally differentially private estimation of functionals of discrete distributions · NeurIPS 2021
Privacy and data protection
distribution testing
0.412020
Locally private non-asymptotic testing of discrete distributions is faster using interactive mechanisms · NeurIPS 2020
Information theory
hypothesis testing
0.412020
Locally private non-asymptotic testing of discrete distributions is faster using interactive mechanisms · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequentially interactive mechanism · 1.5plug-in estimator · 1.5randomized algorithm · 0.9minimax bounds · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Locally differentially private estimation of functionals of discrete distributions
abstract
We study the problem of estimating non-linear functionals of discrete distributions in the context of local differential privacy. The initial data $x_1,\ldots,x_n \in[K]$ are supposed i.i.d. and distributed according to an unknown discrete distribution $p = (p_1,\ldots,p_K)$. Only $\alpha$-locally differentially private (LDP) samples $z_1,...,z_n$ are publicly available, where the term 'local' means that each $z_i$ is produced using one individual attribute $x_i$. We exhibit privacy mechanisms (PM) that are interactive (i.e. they are allowed to use already published confidential data) or non-interactive. We describe the behavior of the quadratic risk for estimating the power sum functional $F_{\gamma} = \sum_{k=1}^K p_k^{\gamma}$, $\gamma >0$ as a function of $K, \, n$ and $\alpha$. In the non-interactive case, we study twol plug-in type estimators of $F_{\gamma}$, for all $\gamma >0$, that are similar to the MLE analyzed by Jiao et al. (2017) in the multinomial model. However, due to the privacy constraint the rates we attain are slower and similar to those obtained in the Gaussian model by Collier et al. (2020). In the sequentially interactive case, we introduce for all $\gamma >1$ a two-step procedure which attains the parametric rate $(n \alpha^2)^{-1/2}$ when $\gamma \geq 2$. We give lower bounds results over all $\alpha-$LDP mechanisms and over all estimators using the private samples.
Cristina Butucea, Yann Issartel
NeurIPS1
2020 Locally private non-asymptotic testing of discrete distributions is faster using interactive mechanisms
abstract
We find separation rates for testing multinomial or more general discrete distributions under the constraint of alpha-local differential privacy. We construct efficient randomized algorithms and test procedures, in both the case where only non-interactive privacy mechanisms are allowed and also in the case where all sequentially interactive privacy mechanisms are allowed. The separation rates are faster in the latter case. We prove general information theoretical bounds that allow us to establish the optimality of our algorithms among all pairs of privacy mechanisms and test procedures, in most usual cases. Considered examples include testing uniform, polynomially and exponentially decreasing distributions.
Thomas Berrett, Cristina Butucea
NeurIPS2