Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Alexander G. de G. Matthews

dblp:162/2215 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 74% Generative modeling · 18% Deep learning architectures and training · 4%

Topics — the 24 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
1.742022
Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2022
Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2021
Variational Bayesian dropout: pitfalls and fixes · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › importance sampling
annealed importance sampling
1.632022
Score-Based Diffusion meets Annealed Importance Sampling · NeurIPS 2022
Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2022
Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
1.342020
Functional Regularisation for Continual Learning with Gaussian Processes · ICLR 2020
Gaussian Process Behaviour in Wide Deep Neural Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2018
GPflow: A Gaussian Process Library using TensorFlow · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
monte carlo methods
1.122022
Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2022
Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow
1.122022
Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2022
Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
sequential monte carlo
0.722022
Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2022
Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.612022
Score-Based Diffusion meets Annealed Importance Sampling · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian model selection
marginal likelihood estimation
0.612022
Score-Based Diffusion meets Annealed Importance Sampling · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
score-based generative model
0.612022
Score-Based Diffusion meets Annealed Importance Sampling · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning
0.412020
Functional Regularisation for Continual Learning with Gaussian Processes · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
functional regularization
0.412020
Functional Regularisation for Continual Learning with Gaussian Processes · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.422022
MCMC for Variationally Sparse Gaussian Processes · NIPS 2015
Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference
0.312018
Variational Bayesian dropout: pitfalls and fixes · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks
0.312018
Variational Bayesian dropout: pitfalls and fixes · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
variational dropout
0.312018
Variational Bayesian dropout: pitfalls and fixes · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
variational objective
0.312018
Variational Bayesian dropout: pitfalls and fixes · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › overparameterized neural network
wide neural networks
0.312018
Gaussian Process Behaviour in Wide Deep Neural Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
hamiltonian monte carlo
0.212015
MCMC for Variationally Sparse Gaussian Processes · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › sparse gaussian process
sparse variational gaussian process
0.212015
MCMC for Variationally Sparse Gaussian Processes · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
particle markov chain monte carlo
0.212022
Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.212022
Score-Based Diffusion meets Annealed Importance Sampling · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
dropout
0.112018
Variational Bayesian dropout: pitfalls and fixes · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.112018
Variational Bayesian dropout: pitfalls and fixes · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › hardware acceleration
GPU acceleration
0.112017
GPflow: A Gaussian Process Library using TensorFlow · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

normalizing flow · 1.1variational inference · 1.1stochastic normalizing flows · 0.6particle MCMC · 0.6markov chain · 0.6langevin dynamics · 0.6importance sampling · 0.6hamiltonian dynamics · 0.6markov chain monte carlo · 0.5feynman-kac · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo
abstract
We propose Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo (CRAFT), a method that combines a sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) sampler (itself a generalization of Annealed Importance Sampling) with variational inference using normalizing flows. The normalizing flows are directly trained to transport between annealing temperatures using a KL divergence for each transition. This optimization objective is itself estimated using the normalizing flow/SMC approximation. We show conceptually and using multiple empirical examples that CRAFT improves on Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo (Arbel et al., 2021), on which it builds and also on Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) based Stochastic Normalizing Flows (Wu et al., 2020). By incorporating CRAFT within particle MCMC, we show that such learnt samplers can achieve impressively accurate results on a challenging lattice field theory example.
Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Michael Arbel, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Arnaud Doucet
ICML1
2022 Score-Based Diffusion meets Annealed Importance Sampling
abstract
More than twenty years after its introduction, Annealed Importance Sampling (AIS) remains one of the most effective methods for marginal likelihood estimation. It relies on a sequence of distributions interpolating between a tractable initial distribution and the target distribution of interest which we simulate from approximately using a non-homogeneous Markov chain. To obtain an importance sampling estimate of the marginal likelihood, AIS introduces an extended target distribution to reweight the Markov chain proposal. While much effort has been devoted to improving the proposal distribution used by AIS, by changing the intermediate distributions and corresponding Markov kernels, an underappreciated issue is that AIS uses a convenient but suboptimal extended target distribution. This can hinder its performance. We here leverage recent progress in score-based generative modeling (SGM) to approximate the optimal extended target distribution for AIS proposals corresponding to the discretization of Langevin and Hamiltonian dynamics. We demonstrate these novel, differentiable, AIS procedures on a number of synthetic benchmark distributions and variational auto-encoders.
Arnaud Doucet, Will Grathwohl, Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Heiko Strathmann
NeurIPS3
2021 Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo
abstract
Annealed Importance Sampling (AIS) and its Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) extensions are state-of-the-art methods for estimating normalizing constants of probability distributions. We propose here a novel Monte Carlo algorithm, Annealed Flow Transport (AFT), that builds upon AIS and SMC and combines them with normalizing flows (NFs) for improved performance. This method transports a set of particles using not only importance sampling (IS), Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and resampling steps - as in SMC, but also relies on NFs which are learned sequentially to push particles towards the successive annealed targets. We provide limit theorems for the resulting Monte Carlo estimates of the normalizing constant and expectations with respect to the target distribution. Additionally, we show that a continuous-time scaling limit of the population version of AFT is given by a Feynman–Kac measure which simplifies to the law of a controlled diffusion for expressive NFs. We demonstrate experimentally the benefits and limitations of our methodology on a variety of applications.
Michael Arbel, Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Arnaud Doucet
ICML2
2020 Functional Regularisation for Continual Learning with Gaussian Processes
Michalis K. Titsias, Jonathan Schwarz, Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Razvan Pascanu, Yee Whye Teh
ICLR3
2018 Gaussian Process Behaviour in Wide Deep Neural Networks
Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Jiri Hron, Mark Rowland 0001, Richard E. Turner, Zoubin Ghahramani
ICLR (Poster)1
2018 Variational Bayesian dropout: pitfalls and fixes
abstract
Dropout, a stochastic regularisation technique for training of neural networks, has recently been reinterpreted as a specific type of approximate inference algorithm for Bayesian neural networks. The main contribution of the reinterpretation is in providing a theoretical framework useful for analysing and extending the algorithm. We show that the proposed framework suffers from several issues; from undefined or pathological behaviour of the true posterior related to use of improper priors, to an ill-defined variational objective due to singularity of the approximating distribution relative to the true posterior. Our analysis of the improper log uniform prior used in variational Gaussian dropout suggests the pathologies are generally irredeemable, and that the algorithm still works only because the variational formulation annuls some of the pathologies. To address the singularity issue, we proffer Quasi-KL (QKL) divergence, a new approximate inference objective for approximation of high-dimensional distributions. We show that motivations for variational Bernoulli dropout based on discretisation and noise have QKL as a limit. Properties of QKL are studied both theoretically and on a simple practical example which shows that the QKL-optimal approximation of a full rank Gaussian with a degenerate one naturally leads to the Principal Component Analysis solution.
Jiri Hron, Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Zoubin Ghahramani
ICML2
2017 GPflow: A Gaussian Process Library using TensorFlow
abstract
GPflow is a Gaussian process library that uses TensorFlow for its core computations and Python for its front end. The distinguishing features of GPflow are that it uses variational inference as the primary approximation method, provides concise code through the use of automatic differentiation, has been engineered with a particular emphasis on software testing and is able to exploit GPU hardware.
Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Mark van der Wilk, Tom Nickson, Keisuke Fujii 0002, Alexis Boukouvalas, Pablo León-Villagrá, Zoubin Ghahramani, James Hensman
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2016 On Sparse Variational Methods and the Kullback-Leibler Divergence between Stochastic Processes
abstract
The variational framework for learning inducing variables (Titsias, 2009) has had a large impact on the Gaussian process literature. The framework may be interpreted as minimizing a rigorously defined Kullback-Leibler divergence between the approximating and posterior processes. To our knowledge this connection has thus far gone unremarked in the literature. In this paper we give a substantial generalization of the literature on this topic. We give a new proof of the result for infinite index sets which allows inducing points that are not data points and likelihoods that depend on all function values. We then discuss augmented index sets and show that, contrary to previous works, marginal consistency of augmentation is not enough to guarantee consistency of variational inference with the original model. We then characterize an extra condition where such a guarantee is obtainable. Finally we show how our framework sheds light on interdomain sparse approximations and sparse approximations for Cox processes.
Alexander G. de G. Matthews, James Hensman, Richard E. Turner, Zoubin Ghahramani
AISTATS1
2015 Scalable Variational Gaussian Process Classification
abstract
Gaussian process classification is a popular method with a number of appealing properties. We show how to scale the model within a variational inducing point framework, out-performing the state of the art on benchmark datasets. Importantly, the variational formulation an be exploited to allow classification in problems with millions of data points, as we demonstrate in experiments.
James Hensman, Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Zoubin Ghahramani
AISTATS2
2015 MCMC for Variationally Sparse Gaussian Processes
abstract
Gaussian process (GP) models form a core part of probabilistic machine learning. Considerable research effort has been made into attacking three issues with GP models: how to compute efficiently when the number of data is large; how to approximate the posterior when the likelihood is not Gaussian and how to estimate covariance function parameter posteriors. This paper simultaneously addresses these, using a variational approximation to the posterior which is sparse in sup- port of the function but otherwise free-form. The result is a Hybrid Monte-Carlo sampling scheme which allows for a non-Gaussian approximation over the function values and covariance parameters simultaneously, with efficient computations based on inducing-point sparse GPs.
James Hensman, Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Maurizio Filippone, Zoubin Ghahramani
NIPS2