VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexander G. de G. Matthews
dblp:162/2215
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 74% Generative modeling · 18% Deep learning architectures and training · 4% |
Topics — the 24 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
1.7 | 4 | 2022 | Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2022 Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2021 Variational Bayesian dropout: pitfalls and fixes · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › importance sampling
annealed importance sampling |
1.6 | 3 | 2022 | Score-Based Diffusion meets Annealed Importance Sampling · NeurIPS 2022 Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2022 Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
1.3 | 4 | 2020 | Functional Regularisation for Continual Learning with Gaussian Processes · ICLR 2020 Gaussian Process Behaviour in Wide Deep Neural Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2018 GPflow: A Gaussian Process Library using TensorFlow · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
monte carlo methods |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2022 Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2022 Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
sequential monte carlo |
0.7 | 2 | 2022 | Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2022 Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Score-Based Diffusion meets Annealed Importance Sampling · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian model selection
marginal likelihood estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Score-Based Diffusion meets Annealed Importance Sampling · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
score-based generative model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Score-Based Diffusion meets Annealed Importance Sampling · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Functional Regularisation for Continual Learning with Gaussian Processes · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
functional regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Functional Regularisation for Continual Learning with Gaussian Processes · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.4 | 2 | 2022 | MCMC for Variationally Sparse Gaussian Processes · NIPS 2015 Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Variational Bayesian dropout: pitfalls and fixes · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Variational Bayesian dropout: pitfalls and fixes · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
variational dropout |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Variational Bayesian dropout: pitfalls and fixes · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
variational objective |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Variational Bayesian dropout: pitfalls and fixes · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › overparameterized neural network
wide neural networks |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Gaussian Process Behaviour in Wide Deep Neural Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
hamiltonian monte carlo |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | MCMC for Variationally Sparse Gaussian Processes · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › sparse gaussian process
sparse variational gaussian process |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | MCMC for Variationally Sparse Gaussian Processes · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
particle markov chain monte carlo |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Score-Based Diffusion meets Annealed Importance Sampling · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
dropout |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Variational Bayesian dropout: pitfalls and fixes · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Variational Bayesian dropout: pitfalls and fixes · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › hardware acceleration
GPU acceleration |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | GPflow: A Gaussian Process Library using TensorFlow · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
normalizing flow · 1.1variational inference · 1.1stochastic normalizing flows · 0.6particle MCMC · 0.6markov chain · 0.6langevin dynamics · 0.6importance sampling · 0.6hamiltonian dynamics · 0.6markov chain monte carlo · 0.5feynman-kac · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte CarloabstractWe propose Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo (CRAFT), a method that combines a sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) sampler (itself a generalization of Annealed Importance Sampling) with variational inference using normalizing flows. The normalizing flows are directly trained to transport between annealing temperatures using a KL divergence for each transition. This optimization objective is itself estimated using the normalizing flow/SMC approximation. We show conceptually and using multiple empirical examples that CRAFT improves on Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo (Arbel et al., 2021), on which it builds and also on Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) based Stochastic Normalizing Flows (Wu et al., 2020). By incorporating CRAFT within particle MCMC, we show that such learnt samplers can achieve impressively accurate results on a challenging lattice field theory example. Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Michael Arbel, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Arnaud Doucet |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Score-Based Diffusion meets Annealed Importance SamplingabstractMore than twenty years after its introduction, Annealed Importance Sampling (AIS) remains one of the most effective methods for marginal likelihood estimation. It relies on a sequence of distributions interpolating between a tractable initial distribution and the target distribution of interest which we simulate from approximately using a non-homogeneous Markov chain. To obtain an importance sampling estimate of the marginal likelihood, AIS introduces an extended target distribution to reweight the Markov chain proposal. While much effort has been devoted to improving the proposal distribution used by AIS, by changing the intermediate distributions and corresponding Markov kernels, an underappreciated issue is that AIS uses a convenient but suboptimal extended target distribution. This can hinder its performance. We here leverage recent progress in score-based generative modeling (SGM) to approximate the optimal extended target distribution for AIS proposals corresponding to the discretization of Langevin and Hamiltonian dynamics. We demonstrate these novel, differentiable, AIS procedures on a number of synthetic benchmark distributions and variational auto-encoders. Arnaud Doucet, Will Grathwohl, Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Heiko Strathmann |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Annealed Flow Transport Monte CarloabstractAnnealed Importance Sampling (AIS) and its Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) extensions are state-of-the-art methods for estimating normalizing constants of probability distributions. We propose here a novel Monte Carlo algorithm, Annealed Flow Transport (AFT), that builds upon AIS and SMC and combines them with normalizing flows (NFs) for improved performance. This method transports a set of particles using not only importance sampling (IS), Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and resampling steps - as in SMC, but also relies on NFs which are learned sequentially to push particles towards the successive annealed targets. We provide limit theorems for the resulting Monte Carlo estimates of the normalizing constant and expectations with respect to the target distribution. Additionally, we show that a continuous-time scaling limit of the population version of AFT is given by a Feynman–Kac measure which simplifies to the law of a controlled diffusion for expressive NFs. We demonstrate experimentally the benefits and limitations of our methodology on a variety of applications. Michael Arbel, Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Arnaud Doucet |
ICML | 2 |
| 2020 | Functional Regularisation for Continual Learning with Gaussian Processes
Michalis K. Titsias, Jonathan Schwarz, Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Razvan Pascanu, Yee Whye Teh |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2018 | Gaussian Process Behaviour in Wide Deep Neural Networks
Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Jiri Hron, Mark Rowland 0001, Richard E. Turner, Zoubin Ghahramani |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2018 | Variational Bayesian dropout: pitfalls and fixesabstractDropout, a stochastic regularisation technique for training of neural networks, has recently been reinterpreted as a specific type of approximate inference algorithm for Bayesian neural networks. The main contribution of the reinterpretation is in providing a theoretical framework useful for analysing and extending the algorithm. We show that the proposed framework suffers from several issues; from undefined or pathological behaviour of the true posterior related to use of improper priors, to an ill-defined variational objective due to singularity of the approximating distribution relative to the true posterior. Our analysis of the improper log uniform prior used in variational Gaussian dropout suggests the pathologies are generally irredeemable, and that the algorithm still works only because the variational formulation annuls some of the pathologies. To address the singularity issue, we proffer Quasi-KL (QKL) divergence, a new approximate inference objective for approximation of high-dimensional distributions. We show that motivations for variational Bernoulli dropout based on discretisation and noise have QKL as a limit. Properties of QKL are studied both theoretically and on a simple practical example which shows that the QKL-optimal approximation of a full rank Gaussian with a degenerate one naturally leads to the Principal Component Analysis solution. Jiri Hron, Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Zoubin Ghahramani |
ICML | 2 |
| 2017 | GPflow: A Gaussian Process Library using TensorFlowabstractGPflow is a Gaussian process library that uses TensorFlow for its core computations and Python for its front end. The distinguishing features of GPflow are that it uses variational inference as the primary approximation method, provides concise code through the use of automatic differentiation, has been engineered with a particular emphasis on software testing and is able to exploit GPU hardware. Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Mark van der Wilk, Tom Nickson, Keisuke Fujii 0002, Alexis Boukouvalas, Pablo León-Villagrá, Zoubin Ghahramani, James Hensman |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2016 | On Sparse Variational Methods and the Kullback-Leibler Divergence between Stochastic ProcessesabstractThe variational framework for learning inducing variables (Titsias, 2009) has had a large impact on the Gaussian process literature. The framework may be interpreted as minimizing a rigorously defined Kullback-Leibler divergence between the approximating and posterior processes. To our knowledge this connection has thus far gone unremarked in the literature. In this paper we give a substantial generalization of the literature on this topic. We give a new proof of the result for infinite index sets which allows inducing points that are not data points and likelihoods that depend on all function values. We then discuss augmented index sets and show that, contrary to previous works, marginal consistency of augmentation is not enough to guarantee consistency of variational inference with the original model. We then characterize an extra condition where such a guarantee is obtainable. Finally we show how our framework sheds light on interdomain sparse approximations and sparse approximations for Cox processes. Alexander G. de G. Matthews, James Hensman, Richard E. Turner, Zoubin Ghahramani |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2015 | Scalable Variational Gaussian Process ClassificationabstractGaussian process classification is a popular method with a number of appealing properties. We show how to scale the model within a variational inducing point framework, out-performing the state of the art on benchmark datasets. Importantly, the variational formulation an be exploited to allow classification in problems with millions of data points, as we demonstrate in experiments. James Hensman, Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Zoubin Ghahramani |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2015 | MCMC for Variationally Sparse Gaussian ProcessesabstractGaussian process (GP) models form a core part of probabilistic machine learning. Considerable research effort has been made into attacking three issues with GP models: how to compute efficiently when the number of data is large; how to approximate the posterior when the likelihood is not Gaussian and how to estimate covariance function parameter posteriors. This paper simultaneously addresses these, using a variational approximation to the posterior which is sparse in sup- port of the function but otherwise free-form. The result is a Hybrid Monte-Carlo sampling scheme which allows for a non-Gaussian approximation over the function values and covariance parameters simultaneously, with efficient computations based on inducing-point sparse GPs. James Hensman, Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Maurizio Filippone, Zoubin Ghahramani |
NIPS | 2 |