Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ronnie Stafford

dblp:162/2220 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 62% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 38%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel embedding
conditional mean embedding
0.212016
Compressed Conditional Mean Embeddings for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2016
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.212016
Compressed Conditional Mean Embeddings for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2016
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.112016
Compressed Conditional Mean Embeddings for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2016
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning › model-based planning
planning with learned models
0.112016
Compressed Conditional Mean Embeddings for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse-greedy kernel regression · 0.2kernel least-squares · 0.2dynamic programming · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Compressed Conditional Mean Embeddings for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning
abstract
We present a model-based approach to solving Markov decision processes (MDPs) in which the system dynamics are learned using conditional mean embeddings (CMEs). This class of methods comes with strong performance guarantees, and enables planning to be performed in an induced finite (pseudo-)MDP, which approximates the MDP, but can be solved exactly using dynamic programming. Two drawbacks of existing methods exist: firstly, the size of the induced finite (pseudo-)MDP scales quadratically with the amount of data used to learn the model, costing much memory and time when planning with the learned model; secondly, learning the CME itself using powerful kernel least-squares is costly – a second computational bottleneck. We present an algorithm which maintains a rich kernelized CME model class, but solves both problems: firstly we demonstrate that the loss function for the CME model suggests a principled approach to compressing the induced (pseudo-)MDP, leading to faster planning, while maintaining guarantees; secondly we propose to learn the CME model itself using fast sparse-greedy kernel regression well-suited to the RL context. We demonstrate superior performance to existing methods in this class of modelbased approaches on a range of MDPs.
Guy Lever, John Shawe-Taylor, Ronnie Stafford, Csaba Szepesvári
AAAI3
2015 Modelling Policies in MDPs in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space
abstract
We consider modelling policies for MDPs in (vector-valued) reproducing kernel Hilbert function spaces (RKHS). This enables us to work “non-parametrically” in a rich function class, and provides the ability to learn complex policies. We present a framework for performing gradient-based policy optimization in the RKHS, deriving the functional gradient of the return for our policy, which has a simple form and can be estimated efficiently. The policy representation naturally focuses on the relevant region of state space defined by the policy trajectories, and does not rely on a-priori defined basis points; this can be an advantage in high dimensions where suitable basis points may be difficult to define a-priori. The method is adaptive in the sense that the policy representation will naturally adapt to the complexity of the policy being modelled, which is achieved with standard efficient sparsification tools in an RKHS. We argue that finding a good kernel on states can be easier then remetrizing a high dimensional feature space. We demonstrate the approach on benchmark domains and a simulated quadrocopter navigation task.
Guy Lever, Ronnie Stafford
AISTATS2