Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Poliakoff

dblp:163/4895 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-9678-0766ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 75% High-performance computing · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel programming models › structured parallelism
hierarchical parallelism
0.612022
Kokkos 3: Programming Model Extensions for the Exascale Era · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2022
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models
0.612022
Kokkos 3: Programming Model Extensions for the Exascale Era · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2022
High-performance computing › performance engineering
performance portability
0.612022
Kokkos 3: Programming Model Extensions for the Exascale Era · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2022
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel programming models
portable programming models
0.612022
Kokkos 3: Programming Model Extensions for the Exascale Era · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

benchmarking · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Kokkos 3: Programming Model Extensions for the Exascale Era
abstract
As the push towards exascale hardware has increased the diversity of system architectures, performance portability has become a critical aspect for scientific software. We describe the Kokkos Performance Portable Programming Model that allows developers to write single source applications for diverse high-performance computing architectures. Kokkos provides key abstractions for both the compute and memory hierarchy of modern hardware. We describe the novel abstractions that have been added to Kokkos version 3 such as hierarchical parallelism, containers, task graphs, and arbitrary-sized atomic operations to prepare for exascale era architectures. We demonstrate the performance of these new features with reproducible benchmarks on CPUs and GPUs.
Christian Trott, Damien Lebrun-Grandié, Daniel Arndt 0003, Jan Ciesko, Vinh Q. Dang, Nathan D. Ellingwood, Rahulkumar Gayatri, Evan Harvey, Daisy S. Hollman, Daniel Ibanez, Nevin Liber, Jonathan R. Madsen, Jeff Miles, David Poliakoff, Amy Powell, Sivasankaran Rajamanickam, Mikael Simberg, Daniel Sunderland, Bruno Turcksin, Jeremiah J. Wilke
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.14
2014 Particle advection performance over varied architectures and workloads
abstract
Particle advection is a foundational operation for many flow visualization techniques, including streamlines, Finite-Time Lyapunov Exponents (FTLE) calculation, and stream surfaces. The workload for particle advection problems varies greatly, including significant variation in computational requirements. With this study, we consider the performance impacts from hardware architecture on this problem, studying distributed-memory systems with CPUs with varying amounts of cores per node, and with nodes with one to three GPUs. Our goal was to explore which architectures were best suited to which workloads, and why. While the results of this study will help inform visualization scientists which architectures they should use when solving certain flow visualization problems, it is also informative for the larger HPC community, since many simulation codes will soon incorporate visualization via in situ techniques.
Hank Childs, Scott Biersdorff, David Poliakoff, David Camp, Allen D. Malony
HiPC3