Type-and-effect systems help the programmer to organize data and computational effects in a program. While for traditional type systems expressive variants with sophisticated inference algorithms have been developed and widely used in programming languages, type-and-effect systems did not yet gain widespread adoption. One reason for this is that type-and-effect systems are more complex and the existing inference algorithms make compromises between expressiveness, intuitiveness, and decidability. In this work, we present an effect inference algorithm for a type-and-effect system with subtyping, expressive higher-rank polymorphism, and intuitive set-like semantics of effects. In order to deal with scoping issues of higher-rank polymorphism, we delay solving of effect constraints by transforming them into formulae of propositional logic. We prove soundness and completeness of our algorithm with respect to a declarative type-and-effect system. All the presented results have been formalized in the Rocq proof assistant, and the algorithm has been successfully used in the implementation of the Fram programming language.

We present fully abstract encodings of the call-by-name and call-by-value $\lambda$-calculus into HOcore, a minimal higher-order process calculus with no name restriction. We consider several equivalences on the $\lambda$-calculus side -- normal-form bisimilarity, applicative bisimilarity, and contextual equivalence -- that we internalize into abstract machines in order to prove full abstraction of the encodings. We also demonstrate that this technique scales to the $\lambda\mu$-calculus, i.e., a standard extension of the $\lambda$-calculus with control operators.

We present a complete coinductive syntactic theory for an untyped calculus of algebraic operations and handlers, a relatively recent concept that augments a programming language with unprecedented flexibility to define, combine and interpret computational effects. Our theory takes the form of a normal-form bisimilarity and its soundness w.r.t. contextual equivalence hinges on using so-called context variables to test evaluation contexts comprising normal forms other than values. The theory is formulated in purely syntactic elementary terms and its completeness demonstrates the discriminating power of handlers. It crucially takes advantage of the clean separation of effect handling code from effect raising construct, a distinctive feature of algebraic effects, not present in other closely related control structures such as delimited-control operators.

Handlers of algebraic effects aspire to be a practical and robust programming construct that allows one to define, use, and combine different computational effects. Interestingly, a critical problem that still bars the way to their popular adoption is how to combine different uses of the same effect in a program, particularly in a language with a static type-and-effect system. For example, it is rudimentary to define the “mutable memory cell” effect as a pair of operations, put and get , together with a handler, but it is far from obvious how to use this effect a number of times to operate a number of memory cells in a single context. In this paper, we propose a solution based on lexically scoped effects in which each use (an “instance”) of an effect can be singled out by name, bound by an enclosing handler and tracked in the type of the expression. Such a setting proves to be delicate with respect to the choice of semantics, as it depends on the explosive mixture of effects, polymorphism, and reduction under binders. Hence, we devise a novel approach to Kripke-style logical relations that can deal with open terms, which allows us to prove the desired properties of our calculus. We formalise our core results in Coq, and introduce an experimental surface-level programming language to show that our approach is applicable in practice.

Abstract We present a sound and complete bisimilarity for an untyped $$\lambda $$ -calculus with higher-order local references. Our relation compares values by applying them to a fresh variable, like normal-form bisimilarity, and it uses environments to account for the evolving store. We achieve completeness by a careful treatment of evaluation contexts comprising open stuck terms. This work improves over Støvring and Lassen’s incomplete environment-based normal-form bisimilarity for the $$\lambda \rho $$ -calculus, and confirms, in relatively elementary terms, Jaber and Tabareau’s result, that the state construct is discriminative enough to be characterized with a bisimilarity without any quantification over testing arguments.

Abstract We generalise Cayley’s theorem for monoids by providing an explicit formula for a (multi-sorted) equational theory represented by the type $$PX \rightarrow X$$ , where $$P$$ is an arbitrary polynomial endofunctor with natural coefficients. From the computational perspective, examples of effects given by such theories include backtracking nondeterminism (obtained with the original Cayley representation $$X \rightarrow X$$ ), finite mutable state (obtained with $$n \rightarrow X$$ , for a constant n), and their different combinations (via $$n \times X \rightarrow X$$ or $$X^n \rightarrow X$$ ). Moreover, we show that monads induced by such theories are implementable using the type formers available in programming languages based on a polymorphic $$\lambda $$ -calculus, both as compositions of algebraic datatypes and as continuation-like monads. We give a set-theoretic model of the latter in terms of Barr-dinatural transformations. We also introduce , a tool that takes a polynomial as an input and generates the corresponding equational theory together with the two implementations of the induced monad in Haskell.

Normal-form bisimilarity is a simple, easy-to-use behavioral equivalence that relates terms in $\lambda$-calculi by decomposing their normal forms into bisimilar subterms. Moreover, it typically allows for powerful up-to techniques, such as bisimulation up to context, which simplify bisimulation proofs even further. However, proving soundness of these relations becomes complicated in the presence of $\eta$-expansion and usually relies on ad hoc proof methods which depend on the language. In this paper we propose a more systematic proof method to show that an extensional normal-form bisimilarity along with its corresponding up to context technique are sound. We illustrate our technique with three calculi: the call-by-value $\lambda$-calculus, the call-by-value $\lambda$-calculus with the delimited-control operators shift and reset, and the call-by-value $\lambda$-calculus with the abortive control operators call/cc and abort. In the first two cases, there was previously no sound up to context technique validating the $\eta$-law, whereas no theory of normal-form bisimulations for a calculus with call/cc and abort has been presented before. Our results have been fully formalized in the Coq proof assistant.

We present a comprehensive study of the behavioral theory of an untyped $\lambda$-calculus extended with the delimited-control operators shift and reset. To that end, we define a contextual equivalence for this calculus, that we then aim to characterize with coinductively defined relations, called bisimilarities. We consider different styles of bisimilarities (namely applicative, normal-form, and environmental) within a unifying framework, and we give several examples to illustrate their respective strengths and weaknesses. We also discuss how to extend this work to other delimited-control operators.

Proposed originally by Plotkin and Pretnar, algebraic effects and their handlers are a leading-edge approach to computational effects: exceptions, mutable state, nondeterminism, and such. Appreciated for their elegance and expressiveness, they are now progressing into mainstream functional programming languages. In this paper, we introduce and examine programming language constructs that back adoption of programming with algebraic effects on a larger scale in a modular fashion by providing mechanisms for abstraction. We propose two such mechanisms: existential effects (which hide the details of a particular effect from the user) and local effects (which guarantee that no code coming from the outside can interfere with a given effect). The main technical difficulty arises from the dynamic nature of coupling an effectful operation with the right handler during execution, but, as we show in this paper, a carefully designed type system can ensure that this will not break the abstraction. Our main contribution is a novel calculus for algebraic effects and handlers, called λ HEL , equipped with local and existential algebraic effects, in which the dynamic nature of handlers is kept in check by typed runtime coercions. As a proof of concept, we present an experimental programming language based on our calculus, which provides strong abstraction mechanisms via an ML-style module system.

A coercion semantics of a programming language with subtyping is typically defined on typing derivations rather than on typing judgments. To avoid semantic ambiguity, such a semantics is expected to be coherent, i.e., independent of the typing derivation for a given typing judgment. In this article we present heterogeneous, biorthogonal, step-indexed logical relations for establishing the coherence of coercion semantics of programming languages with subtyping. To illustrate the effectiveness of the proof method, we develop a proof of coherence of a type-directed, selective CPS translation from a typed call-by-value lambda calculus with delimited continuations and control-effect subtyping. The article is accompanied by a Coq formalization that relies on a novel shallow embedding of a logic for reasoning about step-indexing.

Algebraic effects and handlers have received a lot of attention recently, both from the theoretical point of view and in practical language design. This stems from the fact that algebraic effects give the programmer unprecedented freedom to define, combine, and interpret computational effects. This plenty-of-rope, however, demands not only a deep understanding of the underlying semantics, but also access to practical means of reasoning about effectful code, including correctness and program equivalence. In this paper we tackle this problem by constructing a step-indexed relational interpretation of a call-by-value calculus with algebraic effect handlers and a row-based polymorphic type-and-effect system. Our calculus, while striving for simplicity, enjoys desirable theoretical properties, and is close to the cores of programming languages with algebraic effects used in the wild, while the logical relation we build for it can be used to reason about non-trivial properties, such as contextual equivalence and contextual approximation of programs. Our development has been fully formalised in the Coq proof assistant.

We present fully abstract encodings of the call-by-name λ-calculus into HOcore, a minimal higher-order process calculus with no name restriction. We consider several equivalences on the λ-calculus side - normal-form bisimilarity, applicative bisimilarity, and contextual equivalence - that we internalize into abstract machines in order to prove full abstraction.

We present sound and complete environmental bisimilarities for a variant of Dybvig et al.'s calculus of multi-prompted delimited-control operators with dynamic prompt generation. The reasoning principles that we obtain generalize and advance the existing techniques for establishing program equivalence in calculi with single-prompted delimited control. The basic theory that we develop is presented using Madiot et al.'s framework that allows for smooth integration and composition of up-to techniques facilitating bisimulation proofs. We also generalize the framework in order to express environmental bisimulations that support equivalence proofs of evaluation contexts representing continuations. This change leads to a novel and powerful up-to technique enhancing bisimulation proofs in the presence of control operators.