Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrés F. Barrientos
dblp:164/1852 · also Andres Felipe Barrientos
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-8196-7229ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 87% Learning theory · 13% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
1.0 | 2 | 2024 | Differentially private methods for managing model uncertainty in linear regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Differentially Private Regression Diagnostics · ICDM 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian model selection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Differentially private methods for managing model uncertainty in linear regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian model selection
model averaging |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Differentially private methods for managing model uncertainty in linear regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Differentially Private Regression Diagnostics · ICDM 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
hypothesis testing |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Differentially private methods for managing model uncertainty in linear regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
likelihood ratio test · 1.5information criterion · 1.5bayesian model averaging · 1.5residual plots · 0.2differential privacy · 0.2ROC curves · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Differentially private methods for managing model uncertainty in linear regressionabstractIn this article, we propose differentially private methods for hypothesis testing, model averaging, and model selection for normal linear models. We propose Bayesian methods based on mixtures of $g$-priors and non-Bayesian methods based on likelihood-ratio statistics and information criteria. The procedures are asymptotically consistent and straightforward to implement with existing software. We focus on practical issues such as adjusting critical values so that hypothesis tests have adequate type I error rates and quantifying the uncertainty introduced by the privacy-ensuring mechanisms. Víctor Peña, Andrés F. Barrientos |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2018 | Is my model any good: differentially private regression diagnostics
Yan Chen 0022, Andrés F. Barrientos, Ashwin Machanavajjhala, Jerome P. Reiter |
Knowl. Inf. Syst. | 2 |
| 2016 | Differentially Private Regression DiagnosticsabstractLinear and logistic regression are popular statistical techniques for analyzing multi-variate data. Typically, analysts do not simply posit a particular form of the regression model, estimate its parameters, and use the results for inference orprediction. Instead, they first use a variety of diagnostic techniques to assess how well the model fits the relationships in the data and how well it can be expected to predict outcomes for out-of-sample records, revising the model as necessary to improve fit and predictive power. In this article, we develop ε-differentially private diagnostics for regression, beginning to fill a gap in privacy-preserving data analysis. Specifically, we create differentially private versions of residual plots for linear regression and of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for logistic regression. The former helps determine whether or not the data satisfy the assumptions underlying the linear regression model, and the latter is used to assess the predictive power of the logistic regression model. These diagnostics improve the usefulness of algorithms for computing differentially private regression output, which alone does not allow analysts to assess the quality of the posited model. Our empirical studies show that these algorithms are adequate for diagnosing the fit and predictive power of regression models on representative datasets when the size of the dataset times the privacy parameter (ε) is at least 1000. Yan Chen 0022, Ashwin Machanavajjhala, Jerome P. Reiter, Andrés F. Barrientos |
ICDM | 4 |