Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eric Martinez

dblp:164/5556 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Theory of computation · 4

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Emerging computing paradigms · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Emerging computing paradigms
molecular computing
0.312017
Universal Shape Replicators via Self-Assembly with Attractive and Repulsive Forces · SODA 2017
Emerging computing paradigms
self-assembly
0.312017
Universal Shape Replicators via Self-Assembly with Attractive and Repulsive Forces · SODA 2017
Emerging computing paradigms › molecular computing › algorithmic self-assembly
tile assembly model
0.312017
Universal Shape Replicators via Self-Assembly with Attractive and Repulsive Forces · SODA 2017
Algorithms and data structures
self-assembly
0.112017
Universal Shape Replicators via Self-Assembly with Attractive and Repulsive Forces · SODA 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

attractive and repulsive glues · 0.62-handed assembly model · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Even Laypeople Use Legalese
Eric Martinez, Francis Mollica, Edward Gibson
CogSci1
2022 So much for plain language: An analysis of the accessibility of United States federal laws (1951-2009)
Eric Martinez, Francis Mollica, Edward Gibson
CogSci1
2021 What did I sign? A study of the impenetrability of legalese in contracts
Eric Martinez, Francis Mollica, Anita Podrug, Edward Gibson
CogSci1
2019 Optimal staged self-assembly of linear assemblies
Cameron T. Chalk, Eric Martinez, Robert Schweller, Luis Vega, Andrew Winslow, Tim Wylie
Nat. Comput.2
2018 Freezing Simulates Non-freezing Tile Automata
Cameron T. Chalk, Austin Luchsinger, Eric Martinez, Robert Schweller, Andrew Winslow, Tim Wylie
DNA3
2018 Optimal Staged Self-Assembly of General Shapes
abstract
We analyze the number of tile types t, bins b, and stages necessary to assemble $$n \times n$$ squares and scaled shapes in the staged tile assembly model. For $$n \times n$$ squares, we prove $$\mathcal {O}\left( \frac{\log {n} - tb - t\log t}{b^2} + \frac{\log \log b}{\log t}\right) $$ stages suffice and $$\varOmega \left( \frac{\log {n} - tb - t\log t}{b^2}\right) $$ are necessary for almost all n. For shapes S with Kolmogorov complexity K(S), we prove $$\mathcal {O}\left( \frac{K(S) - tb - t\log t}{b^2} + \frac{\log \log b}{\log t}\right) $$ stages suffice and $$\varOmega \left( \frac{K(S) - tb - t\log t}{b^2}\right) $$ are necessary to assemble a scaled version of S, for almost all S. We obtain similarly tight bounds when the more powerful flexible glues are permitted.
Cameron T. Chalk, Eric Martinez, Robert Schweller, Luis Vega, Andrew Winslow, Tim Wylie
Algorithmica2
2017 Universal Shape Replicators via Self-Assembly with Attractive and Repulsive Forces
abstract
We show how to design a universal shape replicator in a self- assembly system with both attractive and repulsive forces. More precisely, we show that there is a universal set of constant-size objects that, when added to any unknown holefree polyomino shape, produces an unbounded number of copies of that shape (plus constant-size garbage objects). The constant-size objects can be easily constructed from a constant number of individual tile types using a constant number of preprocessing self-assembly steps. Our construction uses the well-studied 2-Handed Assembly Model (2HAM) of tile self-assembly, in the simple model where glues interact only with identical glues, allowing glue strengths that are either positive (attractive) or negative (repulsive), and constant temperature (required glue strength for parts to hold together). We also require that the given shape has specified glue types on its surface, and that the feature size (smallest distance between nonincident edges) is bounded below by a constant. Shape replication necessarily requires a self-assembly model where parts can both attach and detach, and this construction is the first to do so using the natural model of negative/repulsive glues (also studied before for other problems such as fuel-efficient computation); previous replication constructions require more powerful global operations such as an “enzyme” that destroys a subset of the tile types.
Cameron T. Chalk, Erik D. Demaine, Martin L. Demaine, Eric Martinez, Robert Schweller, Luis Vega, Tim Wylie
SODA4
2017 Concentration independent random number generation in tile self-assembly
Cameron T. Chalk, Eric Martinez, Robert Schweller, Tim Wylie
Theor. Comput. Sci.3
2016 Optimal Staged Self-Assembly of General Shapes
Cameron T. Chalk, Eric Martinez, Robert Schweller, Luis Vega, Andrew Winslow, Tim Wylie
ESA2
2015 Flipping Tiles: Concentration Independent Coin Flips in Tile Self-Assembly
Cameron T. Chalk, Alejandro Huerta, Mario A. Maldonado, Eric Martinez, Robert Schweller, Tim Wylie
DNA5