Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Bar-Sinai

dblp:164/5715 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-0153-8465ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
model-based testing
0.712023
Provengo: A Tool Suite for Scenario Driven Model-Based Testing · ASE 2023
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Provengo: A Tool Suite for Scenario Driven Model-Based Testing
abstract
We present Provengo, a comprehensive suite of tools designed to facilitate the implementation of Scenario-Driven Model-Based Testing (SDMBT), an innovative approach that utilizes scenarios to construct a model encompassing the user's perspective and the system's business value while also defining the desired outcomes. With the assistance of Provengo, testers gain the ability to effortlessly create natural user stories and seamlessly integrate them into a model capable of generating effective tests. The demonstration illustrates how SDMBT effectively addresses the bootstrapping challenge commonly encountered in model-based testing (MBT) by enabling incremental development, starting from simple models and gradually augmenting them with additional stories.
Michael Bar-Sinai, Achiya Elyasaf, Gera Weiss, Yeshayahu Weiss
ASE1
2020 Verification of Liveness and Safety Properties of Behavioral Programs Using BPjs
Michael Bar-Sinai, Gera Weiss
ISoLA (4)1
2016 Performance level profiles: A formal language for describing the expected performance of functional modules
abstract
Despite the existence of powerful formal languages for writing robot controllers, most existing functional modules are written using standard programming languages. The existence of such a code base raises critical challenges: 1. How to enable automated analysis, monitoring, and reuse of existing code given that reasoning directly about code fragments is impractical. 2. How to convey to users the expected level of performance of an autonomous robot? 3. Perhaps most crucial: how to quickly identify abnormal behavior of autonomous robots? This is a key impediment to the deployment of such platforms in open environments. We address these issues through the use of performance-level profiles (PLPs), a formal, yet intuitive, language for specifying the expected properties of functional modules, designed with the above aims in mind. PLPs are motivated by action specification languages, such as PDDL 2.1, but add novel elements important for robotic applications, such as update frequency, run-time statistics, progress measures, and trigger conditions, and take into account the different roles modules can play. PLPs have been used to support monitoring in two projects: an autonomous compact track loader, and a service robot. Additionally, we developed a number of tools for automated monitoring-code generation from PLPs.
Ronen I. Brafman, Michael Bar-Sinai, Maor Ashkenazi
IROS2