VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Schlegel
dblp:164/7299
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-5042-5088ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 67% Language models and text generation · 33% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering
astronomy |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | A Gaussian Process Model of Quasar Spectral Energy Distributions · NIPS 2015 Celeste: Variational inference for a generative model of astronomical images · ICML 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A Gaussian Process Model of Quasar Spectral Energy Distributions · NIPS 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
generative inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Celeste: Variational inference for a generative model of astronomical images · ICML 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Celeste: Variational inference for a generative model of astronomical images · ICML 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational inference · 0.4poisson model · 0.4latent variable model · 0.4gaussian process · 0.4bayesian inference · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Cataloging the visible universe through Bayesian inference in Julia at petascale
Jeffrey Regier, Keno Fischer, Kiran Pamnany, Andreas Noack 0001, Jarrett Revels, Maximilian Lam, Steve Howard, Ryan Giordano, David Schlegel, Jon D. McAuliffe, Rollin C. Thomas, Prabhat |
J. Parallel Distributed Comput. | 9 |
| 2018 | Cataloging the Visible Universe Through Bayesian Inference at PetascaleabstractAstronomical catalogs derived from wide-field imaging surveys are an important tool for understanding the Universe. We construct an astronomical catalog from 55 TB of imaging data using Celeste, a Bayesian variational inference code written entirely in the high-productivity programming language Julia. Using over 1.3 million threads on 650,000 Intel Xeon Phi cores of the Cori Phase II supercomputer, Celeste achieves a peak rate of 1.54 DP PFLOP/s. Celeste is able to jointly optimize parameters for 188M stars and galaxies, loading and processing 178 TB across 8192 nodes in 14.6 minutes. To achieve this, Celeste exploits parallelism at multiple levels (cluster, node, and thread) and accelerates I/O through Cori's Burst Buffer. Julia's native performance enables Celeste to employ high-level constructs without resorting to hand-written or generated low-level code (C/C++/Fortran), and yet achieve petascale performance. Jeffrey Regier, Kiran Pamnany, Keno Fischer, Andreas Noack 0001, Maximilian Lam, Jarrett Revels, Steve Howard, Ryan Giordano, David Schlegel, Jon D. McAuliffe, Rollin C. Thomas, Prabhat |
IPDPS | 9 |
| 2015 | Celeste: Variational inference for a generative model of astronomical imagesabstractWe present a new, fully generative model of optical telescope image sets, along with a variational procedure for inference. Each pixel intensity is treated as a Poisson random variable, with a rate parameter dependent on latent properties of stars and galaxies. Key latent properties are themselves random, with scientific prior distributions constructed from large ancillary data sets. We check our approach on synthetic images. We also run it on images from a major sky survey, where it exceeds the performance of the current state-of-the-art method for locating celestial bodies and measuring their colors. Jeffrey Regier, Andrew C. Miller, Jon D. McAuliffe, Ryan P. Adams, Matthew Hoffman 0001, Dustin Lang, David Schlegel, Prabhat |
ICML | 7 |
| 2015 | A Gaussian Process Model of Quasar Spectral Energy DistributionsabstractWe propose a method for combining two sources of astronomical data, spectroscopy and photometry, that carry information about sources of light (e.g., stars, galaxies, and quasars) at extremely different spectral resolutions. Our model treats the spectral energy distribution (SED) of the radiation from a source as a latent variable that jointly explains both photometric and spectroscopic observations. We place a flexible, nonparametric prior over the SED of a light source that admits a physically interpretable decomposition, and allows us to tractably perform inference. We use our model to predict the distribution of the redshift of a quasar from five-band (low spectral resolution) photometric data, the so called ``photo-z'' problem. Our method shows that tools from machine learning and Bayesian statistics allow us to leverage multiple resolutions of information to make accurate predictions with well-characterized uncertainties. Andrew C. Miller, Albert Wu, Jeffrey Regier, Jon D. McAuliffe, Dustin Lang, Prabhat, David Schlegel, Ryan P. Adams |
NIPS | 7 |