Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Johannes Prade

dblp:164/8949 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Edge and fog computing · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Edge and fog computing › edge cloud
edge datacenter
0.712023
Cost-Optimized, Data-Protection-Aware Offloading Between an Edge Data Center and the Cloud · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2023
Edge and fog computing › mobile edge computing › computation offloading › mobile computation offloading
mobile cloud offloading
0.712023
Cost-Optimized, Data-Protection-Aware Offloading Between an Edge Data Center and the Cloud · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2023
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.212023
Cost-Optimized, Data-Protection-Aware Offloading Between an Edge Data Center and the Cloud · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

approximation algorithm · 1.3NP-hardness proof · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Cost-Optimized, Data-Protection-Aware Offloading Between an Edge Data Center and the Cloud
abstract
An edge data center can host applications that require low-latency access to nearby end devices. If the resource requirements of the applications exceed the capacity of the edge data center, some non-latency-critical application components may be offloaded to the cloud. Such offloading may incur financial costs both for the use of cloud resources and for data transfer between the edge data center and the cloud. Moreover, such offloading may violate data protection requirements if components process sensitive data. The operator of the edge data center has to decide which components to keep in the edge data center and which ones to offload to the cloud. In this paper, we formalize this problem and prove that it is strongly NP-hard. We introduce an optimization algorithm that is fast enough to be run online for dynamic and automatic offloading decisions, guarantees that the solution satisfies hard constraints regarding latency, data protection, and capacity, and achieves near-optimal costs. We also show how the algorithm can be extended to handle multiple edge data centers. Experiments show that the cost of the solution found by our algorithm is on average only 2.7% higher than the optimum.
Zoltán Ádám Mann, Andreas Metzger, Johannes Prade, Robert Seidl, Klaus Pohl
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput.3
2019 Optimized Application Deployment in the Fog
Zoltán Ádám Mann, Andreas Metzger, Johannes Prade, Robert Seidl
ICSOC3
2017 5G via evolved packet core slices: Costs and technology of early deployments
abstract
5G imposes versatile requirements on radio and mobile core network. Such requirements can be supported by parallel so-called slices, each implementing a service-tailored network architecture. This paper shows how such architectures can be implemented with the evolved packet core (EPC). We furthermore provide a cost analysis of an EPC based, sliced network deployment in Japan for 5G services. It shows that the main cost driver are low latency services, as these require a highly distributed infrastructure. For the expected massive number of IoT devices, a centralized infrastructure keeps costs surprisingly cheap in contrast. Overall, the paper shows that EPC is well suited for the 5G challenges, which is relevant especially for the first 5G deployments in 2020.
Wolfgang Kiess, Malla Reddy Sama, József Varga, Johannes Prade, Hans Jochen Morper, Klaus Hoffmann
PIMRC4
2015 Architecture Vision for the 5G Era: Cognitive and Cloud Network Evolution
abstract
Requirements and use cases for the 5G era are demanding in key dimensions such as throughput, latency, scalability and automation. From these, an end-to-end architectural vision has been developed in a holistic way and including novel architectural concepts including 5G access domain and 5G era horizontal layers in conjunction with cloud, software defined and cognitive networks transformation. End-to-end architecture for the 5G era is decomposed in a systematic manner, key attributes and characteristics of the associated architectural domains are described.
Volker Ziegler, Thomas Theimer, Cinzia Sartori, Johannes Prade, Nurit Sprecher, Kishore Albal, Anand S. Bedekar
VTC Spring4