Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Suresh Ramasamy

dblp:165/1323 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-1077-3560ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 63% Legged, aerial and field robots · 37%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › gait control
gait optimization
1.532022
The Geometry of Optimal Gaits for Inertia-Dominated Kinematic Systems · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022
Characterizing Error in Noncommutative Geometric Gait Analysis · ICRA 2022
The Geometry of Optimal Gaits for Drag-Dominated Kinematic Systems · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2019
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
robot locomotion
0.612022
Characterizing Error in Noncommutative Geometric Gait Analysis · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
locomotion
0.622022
The Geometry of Optimal Gaits for Drag-Dominated Kinematic Systems · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2019
The Geometry of Optimal Gaits for Inertia-Dominated Kinematic Systems · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.412019
The Geometry of Optimal Gaits for Drag-Dominated Kinematic Systems · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2019
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization
0.112019
The Geometry of Optimal Gaits for Drag-Dominated Kinematic Systems · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2019
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization
0.112019
The Geometry of Optimal Gaits for Drag-Dominated Kinematic Systems · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

perturbation analysis · 1.1noncommutative geometric analysis · 1.1riemannian geometry · 0.8optimal control · 0.8geometric mechanics · 0.6constraint curvature · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Characterizing Error in Noncommutative Geometric Gait Analysis
abstract
A key problem in robotic locomotion is in finding optimal shape changes to effectively displace systems through the world. Variational techniques for gait optimization require estimates of body displacement per gait cycle; however, these estimates introduce error due to unincluded high order terms. In this paper, we formulate existing estimates for displacement, and describe the contribution of low order terms to these estimates. We additionally describe the magnitude of higher (third) order effects, and identify that choice of body coordinate, gait diameter, and starting phase influence these effects. We demonstrate that variation of such parameters on two example systems (the differential drive car and Purcell swimmer) effectively manages third order contributions.
Capprin Bass, Suresh Ramasamy, Ross L. Hatton
ICRA2
2022 The Geometry of Optimal Gaits for Inertia-Dominated Kinematic Systems
abstract
Isolated mechanical systems—e.g., those floating in space, in free-fall, or on a frictionless surface—are able to achieve net rotation by cyclically changing their shape, even if they have no net angular momentum. Similarly, swimmers immersed in “perfect fluids” are able to use cyclic shape changes to both translate and rotate even if the swimmer-fluid system has no net linear or angular momentum. Finally, systems fully constrained by direct nonholonomic constraints (e.g., passive wheels) can push against these constraints to move through the world. Previous work has demonstrated that the displacement induced by these shape changes corresponds to the amount ofconstraint curvaturethat the gaits enclose. Properly assessing or optimizing the utility of a gait also requires considering the time or resources required to execute it: A gait that produces a small displacement per cycle, but that can be executed in a short time, may produce a faster average velocity than a gait that produces more displacement, but takes longer to complete a cycle at the same instantaneous effort. In this paper, we consider gaits under two instantaneous measures of effort. For each of these costs, we demonstrate that fixing the average instantaneous cost to a unit value allows us to transform the effort costs into time-to-execute costs for any given gait cycle. We then illustrate how the interaction between the constraint curvature and these costs leads to characteristic geometries for optimal cycles, in which the gait trajectories resemble elastic hoops distended from within by internal pressures.
Ross L. Hatton, Zachary Brock, Shuoqi Chen, Howie Choset, Hossein Faraji, Ruijie Fu, Nathan Justus, Suresh Ramasamy
IEEE Trans. Robotics8
2019 The Geometry of Optimal Gaits for Drag-Dominated Kinematic Systems
abstract
In this paper, we present a set of geometric principles for understanding and optimizing the gaits of drag-dominated kinematic locomoting systems. For systems with two shape variables, the dynamics of gait optimization are analogous to the process by which internal pressure and surface tension combine to produce the shape and size of a soap bubble. The internal pressure on the gait curve is provided by the flux of the curvature of the system constraints passing through the surface bounded by the gait, and surface tension is provided by the cost associated with executing the gait, which when executed at optimal (constant-power) pacing is proportional to its pathlength measured under a Riemannian metric. We extend these principles to work on systems with three and then more than three shape variables. We demonstrate these principles on a variety of system geometries (including Purcell's swimmer) and for optimization criteria that include maximizing displacement and efficiency of motion for both translation and turning motions. We also demonstrate how these principles can be used to simultaneously optimize a system's gait kinematics and physical design.
Suresh Ramasamy, Ross L. Hatton
IEEE Trans. Robotics1