Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nader Chmait
dblp:165/2356
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0002-3152-382XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Multi-agent systems · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information theory
information measures |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Understanding and Measuring Collective Intelligence Across Different Cognitive Systems: An Information-Theoretic Approach · IJCAI 2017 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
collective behavior |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Understanding and Measuring Collective Intelligence Across Different Cognitive Systems: An Information-Theoretic Approach · IJCAI 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
information theory · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Understanding and Measuring Collective Intelligence Across Different Cognitive Systems: An Information-Theoretic ApproachabstractWe develop the idea of collective intelligence by analysing a range of factors hindering the effectiveness of interactive cognitive agents. We give insights into how to explore the potential of collectives across different cognitive systems (human, animal and machine) and research areas. The endeavour is to bridge the different research disciplines in which collective intelligence might occur and apply the studies of intelligence in AI to other fields, thereby cross-fertilising diverse areas of study ranging from business and management to social sciences and fundamental biology. Nader Chmait |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2016 | Factors of Collective Intelligence: How Smart Are Agent Collectives?abstractThe dynamics and characteristics behind intelligent cognitive systems lie at the heart of understanding, and devising, successful solutions to a variety of multiagent problems. Despite the extant literature on collective intelligence, important questions like “how does the effectiveness of a collective compare to its isolated members?” and “are there some general rules or properties shaping the spread of intelligence across various cognitive systems and environments?” remain somewhat of a mystery. In this paper we develop the idea of collective intelligence by giving some insight into a range of factors hindering and influencing the effectiveness of interactive cognitive systems. We measure the influence of each examined factor on intelligence independently, and empirically show that collective intelligence is a function of them all simultaneously. We further investigate how the organisational structure of equally sized groups shapes their effectiveness. The outcome is fundamental to the understanding and prediction of the collective performance of multiagent systems, and for quantifying the emergence of intelligence over different environmental settings. Nader Chmait, David L. Dowe, Yuan-Fang Li, David G. Green, Javier Insa-Cabrera |
ECAI | 1 |