In the problem of online facility location with delay, a sequence of n clients appear in the metric space, and they need to be eventually connected to some open facility. The clients do not have to be connected immediately, but such a choice comes with a certain penalty: each client incurs a waiting cost (equal to the difference between its arrival and its connection time). At any point in time, an algorithm may decide to open a facility and connect any subset of clients to it. That is, an algorithm needs to balance three types of costs: cost of opening facilities, costs of connecting clients, and the waiting costs of clients. We study a natural variant of this problem, where clients may be connected also to an already open facility, but such action incurs an extra cost: an algorithm pays for waiting of the facility (a cost incurred separately for each such "late" connection). This is reminiscent of online matching with delays, where both sides of the connection incur a waiting cost. We call this variant two-sided delay to differentiate it from the previously studied one-sided delay, where clients may connect to a facility only at its opening time. We present an O(1)-competitive deterministic algorithm for the two-sided delay variant. Our approach is an extension of the approach used by Jain, Mahdian and Saberi [STOC 2002] for analyzing the performance of offline algorithms for facility location. To this end, we substantially simplify the part of the original argument in which a bound on the sequence of factor-revealing LPs is derived. We then show how to transform our O(1)-competitive algorithm for the two-sided delay variant to O(log n / log log n)-competitive deterministic algorithm for one-sided delays. This improves the known O(log n) bound by Azar and Touitou [FOCS 2020]. We note that all previous online algorithms for problems with delays in general metrics have at least logarithmic ratios.

In approval-based multiwinner elections, we are given a set of voters, a set of candidates, and, for each voter, a set of candidates approved by the voter. The goal is to find a committee of size k that maximizes the total utility of the voters. In this paper, we study approximability of Thiele rules, which are known to be NP-hard to solve exactly. We provide a tight polynomial time approximation algorithm for a natural class of geometrically dominant weights that includes such voting rules as Proportional Approval Voting or p-Geometric. The algorithm is relatively simple: first we solve a linear program and then we round a solution by employing a framework called pipage rounding due to Ageev and Sviridenko (2004) and Calinescu et al. (2011). We provide a matching lower bound via a reduction from the Label Cover problem. Moreover, assuming a conjecture called Gap-ETH, we show that better approximation ratio cannot be obtained even in time f(k)*pow(n,o(k)).

Capacitated k-median is one of the few outstanding optimization problems for which the existence of a polynomial time constant factor approximation algorithm remains an open problem. In a series of recent papers algorithms producing solutions violating either the number of facilities or the capacity by a multiplicative factor were obtained. However, to produce solutions without violations appears to be hard and potentially requires different algorithmic techniques. Notably, if parameterized by the number of facilities k, the problem is also W[2] hard, making the existence of an exact FPT algorithm unlikely. In this work we provide an FPT-time constant factor approximation algorithm preserving both cardinality and capacity of the facilities. The algorithm runs in time 2^O(k log k) n^O(1) and achieves an approximation ratio of 7+epsilon.

We consider the fundamental problem of updating arbitrary routes in a software-defined network in a (transiently) loop-free manner. Our objective is to compute fast network update schedules which minimize the number of interactions (i.e., rounds) between the controller and the network nodes. We first prove that this problem is difficult in general: The problem of deciding whether a k-round update schedule exists is NP-complete already for k = 3, and there are problem instances requiring Ω(n) rounds, where n is the network size. Given these negative results, we introduce an attractive, relaxed notion of loop-freedom. We show that relaxed loop-freedom admits for much shorter update schedules (up to a factor Ω(n) in the best case), and present a scheduling algorithm which requires at most Θ(log n) rounds.

We initiate the study of a natural and practically relevant new variant of online caching where the to-be-cached items can have dependencies. We assume that the universe is a tree T and items are tree nodes; we require that if a node v is cached then the whole subtree T(v) rooted at v is cached as well. This theoretical problem finds an immediate application in the context of forwarding table optimization in IP routing and software-defined networks. We present an elegant online deterministic algorithm TC for this problem, and rigorously prove that its competitive ratio is O(height(T) * k_ALG/(k_ALG-k_OPT+1)), where k_ALG and k_OPT denote the cache sizes of an online and the optimal offline algorithm, respectively. The result is optimal up to a factor of O(height(T)).

We consider the problem of updating arbitrary routes in a software-defined network in a (transiently) loop-free manner. We are interested in fast network updates, i.e., in schedules which minimize the number of interactions (i.e., rounds) between the controller and the network nodes. We first prove that this problem is difficult in general: The problem of deciding whether a k-round schedule exists is NP-complete already for k = 3, and there are problem instances requiring Ω(n) rounds, where n is the network size. Given these negative results, we introduce an attractive, relaxed notion of loop-freedom. We prove that O(log n)-round relaxed loop-free schedules always exist, and can also be computed efficiently.