Socially assistive robots can be used as therapeutic technologies to address depression symptoms. Through three sets of workshops with individuals living with depression and clinicians, we developed design guidelines for a personalized therapeutic robot for adults living with depression. Building on the design of Therabot, workshop participants discussed various aspects of the robot's design, sensors, behaviors, and a robot connected mobile phone app. Similarities among participants and workshops included a preference for a soft textured exterior and natural colors and sounds. There were also differences - clinicians wanted the robot to be able to call for aid, while participants with depression differed in their degree of comfort in sharing data collected by the robot with clinicians.

Using socially assistive robots (SARs) as specialized companions for those living with depression to manage symptoms provides a unique opportunity for exploration of robotic systems as comfort objects. Moreover, the robotic components allow for specialized behavioral responses to particular stimuli, as preferred by the user. We have conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 participants about the zoomorphic robot’s Therabot™ desired behaviors and focus groups with five additional participants regarding the preferred sensors within the Therabot™ system. In this paper, using the data from interviews and focus groups, we explore SAR input and output for depression management. While participants overall expected the robot to respond in much similar ways as a well-trained service animal, they expressed interest in the robot understanding unique information about the environment and the user, such as when the user might need interaction.

Socially-assistive robots (SARs) hold significant potential to transform the management of chronic healthcare conditions (e.g. diabetes, Alzheimer’s, dementia) outside the clinic walls. However doing so entails embedding such autonomous robots into people’s daily lives and home living environments, which are deeply shaped by the cultural and geographic locations within which they are situated. That begs the question whether we can design autonomous interactive behaviors between SARs and humans based on universal machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models of robotic sensor data that would work across such diverse environments? To investigate this, we conducted a long-term user study with 26 participants across two diverse locations (United States and South Korea) with SARs deployed in each user’s home for several weeks. We collected robotic sensor data every second of every day, combined with sophisticated ecological momentary assessment (EMA) sampling techniques, to generate a large-scale dataset of over 270 million data points representing 173 hours of randomly-sampled naturalistic interaction data between the human and SAR. Models built on that data were capable of achieving nearly 84% accuracy for detecting specific interaction modalities (AUC 0.885) when trained/tested on the same location, though suffered significant performance drops when applied to a different location. Further analysis and participant interviews showed that was likely due to differences in home living environments in the US and Korea. The results suggest that our ability to create adaptable behaviors for robotic pets may be dependent on the human-robot interaction (HRI) data available for modeling.

Socially-Assistive Robots (SARs) hold great potential to revolutionize the way we manage chronic illness outside clinical settings, but a current limitation to their broad adoption for this purpose is the lack of "ground truth" around interactions between robots and humans in in-home settings.Such ground truth is a necessity for using robotic sensor data for machine learning models of patient activity patterns or to create AI to customize robotic interactive behavior autonomously.Traditional subjective recall-based data collection methods lack the fine-grained temporal detail to support such AI development, as well as suffering from "recall bias" effects.One potential solution to this challenge is to adapt novel forms of interaction assessment, such as ecological momentary assessment (EMA), to collect patient interaction data in real-time.Here we describe a pilot study utilizing such an EMA system with SARs.We describe the development of the EMA framework, theoretical design issues, and lessons learned.Preliminary machine learning results indicate 75-80% accuracy for detecting specific interaction modalities.We also discuss the potential utility of EMA for exploring cross-cultural differences with in-the-wild robot use, and as a tool to support participatory design research on robotics in healthcare settings.

This paper presents the results of research aimed at developing a methodology for the participatory design of social robots, which are meant to be incorporated into various social contexts (e.g. home, work) and establish social relations with people. In contrast to the dominant technologically driven robot development process, we aim to develop a socially robust and responsible approach to robot design using Participatory Design (PD) methods. The PD process builds on participants' self-identified issues and concerns, and develops robot concepts according to participants' interpretations of the capabilities and potential applications of robotic technologies. We present methodological insights from an ongoing PD project aimed at designing socially assistive robots with older adults diagnosed with depression and their therapists, and identify remaining challenges in this project. We particularly focus on supporting mutual learning between researchers and participants and on promoting active participation of older adults as "designers" (rather than consumers) as foundational aspects of PD. We conclude with reflections regarding how this work can contribute to the further development of social robots and relevant PD methodologies.