Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Omer Yair

dblp:166/1235 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers
Image and video processing · 50% Visualization and visual analytics · 36% Computational photography and imaging · 14%
Artificial intelligence
4 papers
3D vision · 40% Generative modeling · 38% Trustworthy machine learning · 23%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing
image restoration
1.422024
Uncertainty Visualization via Low-Dimensional Posterior Projections · CVPR 2024
Uncertainty Quantification via Neural Posterior Principal Components · NeurIPS 2023
Visualization and visual analytics
uncertainty quantification
0.812024
Uncertainty Visualization via Low-Dimensional Posterior Projections · CVPR 2024
Visualization and visual analytics
uncertainty visualization
0.812024
Uncertainty Visualization via Low-Dimensional Posterior Projections · CVPR 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.712023
Uncertainty Quantification via Neural Posterior Principal Components · NeurIPS 2023
Image and video processing › image restoration
inverse problem
0.712023
Uncertainty Quantification via Neural Posterior Principal Components · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › energy-based model
contrastive divergence
0.512021
Contrastive Divergence Learning is a Time Reversal Adversarial Game · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Generative modeling
energy-based model
0.512021
Contrastive Divergence Learning is a Time Reversal Adversarial Game · ICLR 2021
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation
0.312017
Dynamic Time-of-Flight · CVPR 2017
Computer vision › 3D vision › range sensing
depth sensing
0.312017
Dynamic Time-of-Flight · CVPR 2017
Computer vision › 3D vision › inverse rendering
shape and albedo estimation
0.312017
Bayesian Time-of-Flight for Realtime Shape, Illumination and Albedo · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation › time-of-flight depth
time-of-flight depth camera
0.312017
Dynamic Time-of-Flight · CVPR 2017
Computational photography and imaging
depth estimation
0.312017
Bayesian Time-of-Flight for Realtime Shape, Illumination and Albedo · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017
Computational photography and imaging
time-of-flight imaging
0.312017
Bayesian Time-of-Flight for Realtime Shape, Illumination and Albedo · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
probabilistic generative model
0.112017
Bayesian Time-of-Flight for Realtime Shape, Illumination and Albedo · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

principal component analysis · 1.3neural network · 1.3low-dimensional subspace projection · 0.8energy-based model · 0.8non-parametric regression tree · 0.6multipath simulation · 0.6generative probabilistic model · 0.6game-theoretic analysis · 0.5spatiotemporal filtering · 0.3probabilistic motion model · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Uncertainty Visualization via Low-Dimensional Posterior Projections
abstract
In ill-posed inverse problems, it is commonly desirable to obtain insight into the full spectrum of plausible so-lutions, rather than extracting only a single reconstruction. Information about the plausible solutions and their likelihoods is encoded in the posterior distribution. However, for high-dimensional data, this distribution is challenging to visualize. In this work, we introduce a new approach for estimating and visualizing posteriors by em-ploying energy-based models (EBMs) over low-dimensional subspaces. Specifically, we train a conditional EBM that receives an input measurement and a set of directions that span some low-dimensional subspace of solutions, and outputs the probability density function of the posterior within that space. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method across a diverse range of datasets and image restoration problems, showcasing its strength in uncertainty quantification and visualization. As we show, our method outperforms a baseline that projects samples from a diffusion-based posterior sampler, while being orders of magnitude faster. Furthermore, it is more accurate than a baseline that assumes a Gaussian posterior. Code is available at https://github.com/yairomer/PPDE.
Omer Yair, Elias Nehme, Tomer Michaeli
CVPR1
2023 Uncertainty Quantification via Neural Posterior Principal Components
abstract
Uncertainty quantification is crucial for the deployment of image restoration models in safety-critical domains, like autonomous driving and biological imaging. To date, methods for uncertainty visualization have mainly focused on per-pixel estimates. Yet, a heatmap of per-pixel variances is typically of little practical use, as it does not capture the strong correlations between pixels. A more natural measure of uncertainty corresponds to the variances along the principal components (PCs) of the posterior distribution. Theoretically, the PCs can be computed by applying PCA on samples generated from a conditional generative model for the input image. However, this requires generating a very large number of samples at test time, which is painfully slow with the current state-of-the-art (diffusion) models. In this work, we present a method for predicting the PCs of the posterior distribution for any input image, in a single forward pass of a neural network. Our method can either wrap around a pre-trained model that was trained to minimize the mean square error (MSE), or can be trained from scratch to output both a predicted image and the posterior PCs. We showcase our method on multiple inverse problems in imaging, including denoising, inpainting, super-resolution, and biological image-to-image translation. Our method reliably conveys instance-adaptive uncertainty directions, achieving uncertainty quantification comparable with posterior samplers while being orders of magnitude faster. Code and examples are available on our [webpage](https://eliasnehme.github.io/NPPC/).
Elias Nehme, Omer Yair, Tomer Michaeli
NeurIPS2
2021 Contrastive Divergence Learning is a Time Reversal Adversarial Game
Omer Yair, Tomer Michaeli
ICLR1
2017 Dynamic Time-of-Flight
abstract
Time-of-flight (TOF) depth cameras provide robust depth inference at low power requirements in a wide variety of consumer and industrial applications. These cameras reconstruct a single depth frame from a given set of infrared (IR) frames captured over a very short exposure period. Operating in this mode the camera essentially forgets all information previously captured - and performs depth inference from scratch for every frame. We challenge this practice and propose using previously captured information when inferring depth. An inherent problem we have to address is camera motion over this longer period of collecting observations. We derive a probabilistic framework combining a simple but robust model of camera and object motion, together with an observation model. This combination allows us to integrate information over multiple frames while remaining robust to rapid changes. Operating the camera in this manner has implications in terms of both computational efficiency and how information should be captured. We address these two issues and demonstrate a realtime TOF system with robust temporal integration that improves depth accuracy over strong baseline methods including adaptive spatio-temporal filters.
Michael Schober, Amit Adam, Omer Yair, Shai Mazor, Sebastian Nowozin
CVPR3
2017 Bayesian Time-of-Flight for Realtime Shape, Illumination and Albedo
abstract
We propose a computational model for shape, illumination and albedo inference in a pulsed time-of-flight (TOF) camera. In contrast to TOF cameras based on phase modulation, our camera enables general exposure profiles. This results in added flexibility and requires novel computational approaches. To address this challenge we propose a generative probabilistic model that accurately relates latent imaging conditions to observed camera responses. While principled, realtime inference in the model turns out to be infeasible, and we propose to employ efficient non-parametric regression trees to approximate the model outputs. As a result we are able to provide, for each pixel, at video frame rate, estimates and uncertainty for depth, effective albedo, and ambient light intensity . These results we present are state-of-the-art in depth imaging. The flexibility of our approach allows us to easily enrich our generative model. We demonstrate this by extending the original single-path model to a two-path model, capable of describing some multipath effects. The new model is seamlessly integrated in the system at no additional computational cost. Our work also addresses the important question of optimal exposure design in pulsed TOF systems. Finally, for benchmark purposes and to obtain realistic empirical priors of multipath and insights into this phenomena, we propose a physically accurate simulation of multipath phenomena.
Amit Adam, Christoph Dann, Omer Yair, Shai Mazor, Sebastian Nowozin
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3