Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Omer Yair
dblp:166/1235
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers |
Image and video processing · 50% Visualization and visual analytics · 36% Computational photography and imaging · 14% | |
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
3D vision · 40% Generative modeling · 38% Trustworthy machine learning · 23% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video processing
image restoration |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Uncertainty Visualization via Low-Dimensional Posterior Projections · CVPR 2024 Uncertainty Quantification via Neural Posterior Principal Components · NeurIPS 2023 |
Visualization and visual analytics
uncertainty quantification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Uncertainty Visualization via Low-Dimensional Posterior Projections · CVPR 2024 |
Visualization and visual analytics
uncertainty visualization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Uncertainty Visualization via Low-Dimensional Posterior Projections · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Uncertainty Quantification via Neural Posterior Principal Components · NeurIPS 2023 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
inverse problem |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Uncertainty Quantification via Neural Posterior Principal Components · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › energy-based model
contrastive divergence |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Contrastive Divergence Learning is a Time Reversal Adversarial Game · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
energy-based model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Contrastive Divergence Learning is a Time Reversal Adversarial Game · ICLR 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Dynamic Time-of-Flight · CVPR 2017 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › range sensing
depth sensing |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Dynamic Time-of-Flight · CVPR 2017 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › inverse rendering
shape and albedo estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Bayesian Time-of-Flight for Realtime Shape, Illumination and Albedo · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation › time-of-flight depth
time-of-flight depth camera |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Dynamic Time-of-Flight · CVPR 2017 |
Computational photography and imaging
depth estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Bayesian Time-of-Flight for Realtime Shape, Illumination and Albedo · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017 |
Computational photography and imaging
time-of-flight imaging |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Bayesian Time-of-Flight for Realtime Shape, Illumination and Albedo · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
probabilistic generative model |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Bayesian Time-of-Flight for Realtime Shape, Illumination and Albedo · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
principal component analysis · 1.3neural network · 1.3low-dimensional subspace projection · 0.8energy-based model · 0.8non-parametric regression tree · 0.6multipath simulation · 0.6generative probabilistic model · 0.6game-theoretic analysis · 0.5spatiotemporal filtering · 0.3probabilistic motion model · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Uncertainty Visualization via Low-Dimensional Posterior ProjectionsabstractIn ill-posed inverse problems, it is commonly desirable to obtain insight into the full spectrum of plausible so-lutions, rather than extracting only a single reconstruction. Information about the plausible solutions and their likelihoods is encoded in the posterior distribution. However, for high-dimensional data, this distribution is challenging to visualize. In this work, we introduce a new approach for estimating and visualizing posteriors by em-ploying energy-based models (EBMs) over low-dimensional subspaces. Specifically, we train a conditional EBM that receives an input measurement and a set of directions that span some low-dimensional subspace of solutions, and outputs the probability density function of the posterior within that space. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method across a diverse range of datasets and image restoration problems, showcasing its strength in uncertainty quantification and visualization. As we show, our method outperforms a baseline that projects samples from a diffusion-based posterior sampler, while being orders of magnitude faster. Furthermore, it is more accurate than a baseline that assumes a Gaussian posterior. Code is available at https://github.com/yairomer/PPDE. Omer Yair, Elias Nehme, Tomer Michaeli |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2023 | Uncertainty Quantification via Neural Posterior Principal ComponentsabstractUncertainty quantification is crucial for the deployment of image restoration models in safety-critical domains, like autonomous driving and biological imaging. To date, methods for uncertainty visualization have mainly focused on per-pixel estimates. Yet, a heatmap of per-pixel variances is typically of little practical use, as it does not capture the strong correlations between pixels. A more natural measure of uncertainty corresponds to the variances along the principal components (PCs) of the posterior distribution. Theoretically, the PCs can be computed by applying PCA on samples generated from a conditional generative model for the input image. However, this requires generating a very large number of samples at test time, which is painfully slow with the current state-of-the-art (diffusion) models. In this work, we present a method for predicting the PCs of the posterior distribution for any input image, in a single forward pass of a neural network. Our method can either wrap around a pre-trained model that was trained to minimize the mean square error (MSE), or can be trained from scratch to output both a predicted image and the posterior PCs. We showcase our method on multiple inverse problems in imaging, including denoising, inpainting, super-resolution, and biological image-to-image translation. Our method reliably conveys instance-adaptive uncertainty directions, achieving uncertainty quantification comparable with posterior samplers while being orders of magnitude faster. Code and examples are available on our [webpage](https://eliasnehme.github.io/NPPC/). Elias Nehme, Omer Yair, Tomer Michaeli |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | Contrastive Divergence Learning is a Time Reversal Adversarial Game
Omer Yair, Tomer Michaeli |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2017 | Dynamic Time-of-FlightabstractTime-of-flight (TOF) depth cameras provide robust depth inference at low power requirements in a wide variety of consumer and industrial applications. These cameras reconstruct a single depth frame from a given set of infrared (IR) frames captured over a very short exposure period. Operating in this mode the camera essentially forgets all information previously captured - and performs depth inference from scratch for every frame. We challenge this practice and propose using previously captured information when inferring depth. An inherent problem we have to address is camera motion over this longer period of collecting observations. We derive a probabilistic framework combining a simple but robust model of camera and object motion, together with an observation model. This combination allows us to integrate information over multiple frames while remaining robust to rapid changes. Operating the camera in this manner has implications in terms of both computational efficiency and how information should be captured. We address these two issues and demonstrate a realtime TOF system with robust temporal integration that improves depth accuracy over strong baseline methods including adaptive spatio-temporal filters. Michael Schober, Amit Adam, Omer Yair, Shai Mazor, Sebastian Nowozin |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2017 | Bayesian Time-of-Flight for Realtime Shape, Illumination and AlbedoabstractWe propose a computational model for shape, illumination and albedo inference in a pulsed time-of-flight (TOF) camera. In contrast to TOF cameras based on phase modulation, our camera enables general exposure profiles. This results in added flexibility and requires novel computational approaches. To address this challenge we propose a generative probabilistic model that accurately relates latent imaging conditions to observed camera responses. While principled, realtime inference in the model turns out to be infeasible, and we propose to employ efficient non-parametric regression trees to approximate the model outputs. As a result we are able to provide, for each pixel, at video frame rate, estimates and uncertainty for depth, effective albedo, and ambient light intensity . These results we present are state-of-the-art in depth imaging. The flexibility of our approach allows us to easily enrich our generative model. We demonstrate this by extending the original single-path model to a two-path model, capable of describing some multipath effects. The new model is seamlessly integrated in the system at no additional computational cost. Our work also addresses the important question of optimal exposure design in pulsed TOF systems. Finally, for benchmark purposes and to obtain realistic empirical priors of multipath and insights into this phenomena, we propose a physically accurate simulation of multipath phenomena. Amit Adam, Christoph Dann, Omer Yair, Shai Mazor, Sebastian Nowozin |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |