Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chris Kedzie

dblp:166/1736 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
6as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 6 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
9 papers
Language models and text generation · 55% Question answering and dialogue systems · 16% Information extraction and text analysis · 11%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Information retrieval · 60% Web and social media mining · 40%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › task-oriented dialogue
user simulation
0.912025
SimulatorArena: Are User Simulators Reliable Proxies for Multi-Turn Evaluation of AI Assistants? · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization
0.832018
Content Selection in Deep Learning Models of Summarization · EMNLP 2018
Extractive and Abstractive Event Summarization over Streaming Web Text · IJCAI 2016
Predicting Salient Updates for Disaster Summarization · ACL (1) 2015
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation › automatic evaluation
rubric-based evaluation
0.812024
LLM-Rubric: A Multidimensional, Calibrated Approach to Automated Evaluation of Natural Language Texts · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text evaluation
0.812024
LLM-Rubric: A Multidimensional, Calibrated Approach to Automated Evaluation of Natural Language Texts · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation
0.512021
Cross-language Sentence Selection via Data Augmentation and Rationale Training · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021
Information retrieval › text summarization
event summarization
0.522016
Extractive and Abstractive Event Summarization over Streaming Web Text · IJCAI 2016
Real-Time Web Scale Event Summarization Using Sequential Decision Making · IJCAI 2016
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
controllability
0.412020
Controllable Meaning Representation to Text Generation: Linearization and Data Augmentation Strategies · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
content selection
0.312018
Content Selection in Deep Learning Models of Summarization · EMNLP 2018
Web and social media mining
social media analysis
0.312018
Detecting Gang-Involved Escalation on Social Media Using Context · EMNLP 2018
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
extractive-abstractive summarization
0.212016
Extractive and Abstractive Event Summarization over Streaming Web Text · IJCAI 2016
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
dialogue evaluation
0.212024
LLM-Rubric: A Multidimensional, Calibrated Approach to Automated Evaluation of Natural Language Texts · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization › temporal summarization
update summarization
0.212015
Predicting Salient Updates for Disaster Summarization · ACL (1) 2015
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.112021
Cross-language Sentence Selection via Data Augmentation and Rationale Training · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
rationale-based training
0.112021
Cross-language Sentence Selection via Data Augmentation and Rationale Training · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
task-oriented dialogue
0.112020
Controllable Meaning Representation to Text Generation: Linearization and Data Augmentation Strategies · EMNLP (1) 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

data augmentation · 0.9user simulator · 0.9large language model prompting · 0.8feed-forward neural network calibration · 0.8contextual language model · 0.7rationale training · 0.5sequence-to-sequence · 0.4linearization · 0.4deep learning · 0.3sequential decision-making · 0.2sequential decision making · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SimulatorArena: Are User Simulators Reliable Proxies for Multi-Turn Evaluation of AI Assistants?
abstract
Yao Dou, Michel Galley, Baolin Peng, Chris Kedzie, Weixin Cai, Alan Ritter, Chris Quirk, Wei Xu, Jianfeng Gao. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Yao Dou, Michel Galley, Baolin Peng, Chris Kedzie, Weixin Cai, Alan Ritter, Chris Quirk, Wei Xu 0004, Jianfeng Gao 0001
EMNLP4
2024 LLM-Rubric: A Multidimensional, Calibrated Approach to Automated Evaluation of Natural Language Texts
abstract
This paper introduces a framework for the automated evaluation of natural language texts.A manually constructed rubric describes how to assess multiple dimensions of interest.To evaluate a text, a large language model (LLM) is prompted with each rubric question and produces a distribution over potential responses.The LLM predictions often fail to agree well with human judges-indeed, the humans do not fully agree with one another.However, the multiple LLM distributions can be combined to predict each human judge's annotations on all questions, including a summary question that assesses overall quality or relevance.LLM-RUBRIC accomplishes this by training a small feed-forward neural network that includes both judge-specific and judge-independent parameters.When evaluating dialogue systems in a human-AI information-seeking task, we find that LLM-RUBRIC with 9 questions (assessing dimensions such as naturalness, conciseness, and citation quality) predicts human judges' assessment of overall user satisfaction, on a scale of 1-4, with RMS error ă 0.5, a 2ˆ improvement over the uncalibrated baseline.
Helia Hashemi, Jason Eisner, Corby Rosset, Benjamin Van Durme, Chris Kedzie
ACL (1)5
2021 Cross-language Sentence Selection via Data Augmentation and Rationale Training
abstract
Yanda Chen, Chris Kedzie, Suraj Nair, Petra Galuscakova, Rui Zhang, Douglas Oard, Kathleen McKeown. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021.
Yanda Chen, Chris Kedzie, Suraj Nair 0001, Petra Galuscáková, Rui Zhang 0037, Douglas W. Oard, Kathy McKeown
ACL/IJCNLP (1)2
2021 Segmenting Subtitles for Correcting ASR Segmentation Errors
abstract
David Wan, Chris Kedzie, Faisal Ladhak, Elsbeth Turcan, Petra Galuscakova, Elena Zotkina, Zhengping Jiang, Peter Bell, Kathleen McKeown. Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume. 2021.
David Wan, Chris Kedzie, Faisal Ladhak, Elsbeth Turcan, Petra Galuscáková, Elena Zotkina, Zhengping Jiang, Peter Bell 0001, Kathy McKeown
EACL2
2020 Controllable Meaning Representation to Text Generation: Linearization and Data Augmentation Strategies
abstract
We study the degree to which neural sequenceto-sequence models exhibit fine-grained controllability when performing natural language generation from a meaning representation.Using two task-oriented dialogue generation benchmarks, we systematically compare the effect of four input linearization strategies on controllability and faithfulness.Additionally, we evaluate how a phrase-based data augmentation method can improve performance.We find that properly aligning input sequences during training leads to highly controllable generation, both when training from scratch or when fine-tuning a larger pre-trained model.Data augmentation further improves control on difficult, randomly generated utterance plans.
Chris Kedzie, Kathy McKeown
EMNLP (1)1
2019 Multimodal Social Media Analysis for Gang Violence Prevention
Philipp Blandfort, Desmond Upton Patton, William R. Frey, Svebor Karaman, Surabhi Bhargava, Fei-Tzin Lee, Siddharth Varia, Chris Kedzie, Michael B. Gaskell, Rossano Schifanella, Kathy McKeown, Shih-Fu Chang
ICWSM8
2019 Low Level Linguistic Controls for Style Transfer and Content Preservation
abstract
Despite the success of style transfer in image processing, it has seen limited progress in natural language generation. Part of the problem is that content is not as easily decoupled from style in the text domain. Curiously, in the field of stylometry, content does not figure prominently in practical methods of discriminating stylistic elements, such as authorship and genre. Rather, syntax and function words are the most salient features. Drawing on this work, we model style as a suite of low-level linguistic controls, such as frequency of pronouns, prepositions, and subordinate clause constructions. We train a neural encoder-decoder model to reconstruct reference sentences given only content words and the setting of the controls. We perform style transfer by keeping the content words fixed while adjusting the controls to be indicative of another style. In experiments, we show that the model reliably responds to the linguistic controls and perform both automatic and manual evaluations on style transfer. We find we can fool a style classifier 84% of the time, and that our model produces highly diverse and stylistically distinctive outputs. This work introduces a formal, extendable model of style that can add control to any neural text generation system.
Katy Ilonka Gero, Chris Kedzie, Jonathan Reeve, Lydia B. Chilton
INLG2
2019 A Good Sample is Hard to Find: Noise Injection Sampling and Self-Training for Neural Language Generation Models
abstract
Deep neural networks (DNN) are quickly becoming the de facto standard modeling method for many natural language generation (NLG) tasks.In order for such models to truly be useful, they must be capable of correctly generating utterances for novel meaning representations (MRs) at test time.In practice, even sophisticated DNNs with various forms of semantic control frequently fail to generate utterances faithful to the input MR.In this paper, we propose an architecture agnostic selftraining method to sample novel MR/text utterance pairs to augment the original training data.Remarkably, after training on the augmented data, even simple encoder-decoder models with greedy decoding are capable of generating semantically correct utterances that are as good as state-of-the-art outputs in both automatic and human evaluations of quality.
Chris Kedzie, Kathy McKeown
INLG1
2018 Detecting Gang-Involved Escalation on Social Media Using Context
abstract
Serina Chang, Ruiqi Zhong, Ethan Adams, Fei-Tzin Lee, Siddharth Varia, Desmond Patton, William Frey, Chris Kedzie, Kathy McKeown. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2018.
Serina Chang, Ruiqi Zhong, Ethan Adams, Fei-Tzin Lee, Siddharth Varia, Desmond Upton Patton, William R. Frey, Chris Kedzie, Kathy McKeown
EMNLP8
2018 Content Selection in Deep Learning Models of Summarization
abstract
We carry out experiments with deep learning models of summarization across the domains of news, personal stories, meetings, and medical articles in order to understand how content selection is performed.We find that many sophisticated features of state of the art extractive summarizers do not improve performance over simpler models.These results suggest that it is easier to create a summarizer for a new domain than previous work suggests and bring into question the benefit of deep learning models for summarization for those domains that do have massive datasets (i.e., news).At the same time, they suggest important questions for new research in summarization; namely, new forms of sentence representations or external knowledge sources are needed that are better suited to the sumarization task.
Chris Kedzie, Kathy McKeown, Hal Daumé III
EMNLP1
2016 Real-Time Web Scale Event Summarization Using Sequential Decision Making
Chris Kedzie, Fernando Diaz 0001, Kathy McKeown
IJCAI1
2016 Extractive and Abstractive Event Summarization over Streaming Web Text
Chris Kedzie, Kathy McKeown
IJCAI1
2015 Predicting Salient Updates for Disaster Summarization
abstract
Chris Kedzie, Kathleen McKeown, Fernando Diaz. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2015.
Chris Kedzie, Kathy McKeown, Fernando Diaz 0001
ACL (1)1