Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brendan J. Bialy

dblp:166/3632 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-8993-0942ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
1.012026
Differentially Private Linear Programming: Reduced Sub-Optimality and Guaranteed Constraint Satisfaction · AAAI 2026
Mathematical optimization
linear programming
1.012026
Differentially Private Linear Programming: Reduced Sub-Optimality and Guaranteed Constraint Satisfaction · AAAI 2026
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Differentially Private Linear Programming: Reduced Sub-Optimality and Guaranteed Constraint Satisfaction
abstract
Linear programming is a fundamental tool in a wide range of decision systems. However, without privacy protections, sharing the solution to a linear program may reveal information about the underlying data used to formulate it, which may be sensitive. Therefore, in this paper we introduce an approach for protecting sensitive data while formulating and solving a linear program. First, we prove that this method perturbs objectives and constraints in a way that makes them differentially private. Then, we show that (i) privatized problems always have solutions, and (ii) their solutions satisfy the constraints in their corresponding original, non-private problems. The latter result solves an open problem in the literature. Next, we analytically bound the expected sub-optimality of solutions that is induced by privacy. Numerical simulations show that, under a typical privacy setup, the solution produced by our method yields a 65% reduction in sub-optimality compared to the state of the art.
Alexander Benvenuti, Brendan J. Bialy, Miriam E. Dennis, Matthew T. Hale
AAAI2