A significant amount of time is spent by software developers in investigating bug reports. It is useful to indicate when a bug report will be closed, since it would help software teams to prioritise their work. Several studies have been conducted to address this problem in the past decade. Most of these studies have used the frequency of occurrence of certain developer activities as input attributes in building their prediction models. However, these approaches tend to ignore the temporal nature of the occurrence of these activities. In this paper, a novel approach using Hidden Markov models (HMMs) and temporal sequences of developer activities is proposed. The approach is empirically demonstrated in a case study using eight years of bug reports collected from the Firefox project. We provide additional details below. In a software bug repository, recorded developer activities occur sequentially. For example, activity C (a certain person has been copied on the bug report) is followed by activity A (bug confirmed and assigned to a named developer), which in turn is followed by activity Z (bug reached status resolved). Additional piece of information is developers' level of expertise, such as novice (N), intermediate (M), or experienced (E), at the time of report creation. We combine these data together to produce a sequence of temporal activities associated with bug reports in the Firefox bug repository.

A significant amount of time is spent by software developers in investigating bug reports. It is useful to indicate when a bug report will be closed, since it would help software teams to prioritise their work. Several studies have been conducted to address this problem in the past decade. Most of these studies have used the frequency of occurrence of certain developer activities as input attributes in building their prediction models. However, these approaches tend to ignore the temporal nature of the occurrence of these activities. In this paper, a novel approach using Hidden Markov Models and temporal sequences of developer activities is proposed. The approach is empirically demonstrated in a case study using eight years of bug reports collected from the Firefox project. Our proposed model correctly identifies bug reports with expected bug fix times. We also compared our proposed approach with the state of the art technique in the literature in the context of our case study. Our approach results in approximately 33 percent higher F-measure than the contemporary technique based on the Firefox project data.

Defect prediction models presented in the literature lack generalization unless the original study can be replicated using new datasets and in different organizational settings. Practitioners can also benefit from replicating studies in their own environment by gaining insights and comparing their findings with those reported. In this work, we replicated an earlier study in order to investigate the merits of organizational metrics in building defect prediction models for large-scale enterprise software. We mined the organizational, code complexity, code churn and pre-release bug metrics of that large scale software and built defect prediction models for each metric set. In the original study, organizational metrics were found to achieve the highest performance. In our case, models based on organizational metrics performed better than models based on churn metrics but were outperformed by pre-release metric models. Further, we verified four individual organizational metrics as indicators for defects. We conclude that the performance of different metric sets in building defect prediction models depends on the project's characteristics and the targeted prediction level. Our replication of earlier research enabled assessing the validity and limitations of organizational metrics in a different context.

The bug tracking repositories of software projects capture initial defect (bug) reports and the history of interactions among developers, testers, and customers. Extracting and mining information from these repositories is time consuming and daunting. Researchers have focused mostly on analyzing the frequency of the occurrence of defects and their attributes (e.g., The number of comments and lines of code changed, count of developers). However, the counting process eliminates information about the temporal alignment of events leading to changes in the attributes count. Software quality teams could plan and prioritize their work more efficiently if they were aware of these temporal sequences and knew their frequency of occurrence. In this paper, we introduce a novel dataset mined from the Fire fox bug repository (Bugzilla) which contains information about the temporal alignment of developer interactions. Our dataset covers eight years of data from the Fire fox project on activities throughout the project's lifecycle. Some of these activities have not been reported in frequency-based or other temporal datasets. The dataset we mined from the Fire fox project contains new activities, such as reporter experience, file exchange events, code-review process activities, and setting of milestones. We believe that this new dataset will improve analysis of bug reports and enable mining of temporal relationships so that practitioners can enhance their bug-fixing process.