Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thoralf M. Sundt

dblp:166/5188 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning paradigms · 50% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 50%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
class imbalance
0.212015
Instance Weighting for Patient-Specific Risk Stratification Models · KDD 2015
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
instance weighting
0.212015
Instance Weighting for Patient-Specific Risk Stratification Models · KDD 2015
Medical and health informatics
clinical prediction
0.212015
Instance Weighting for Patient-Specific Risk Stratification Models · KDD 2015
Medical and health informatics
clinical decision support
0.112015
Instance Weighting for Patient-Specific Risk Stratification Models · KDD 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

instance weighting · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Instance Weighting for Patient-Specific Risk Stratification Models
abstract
Accurate risk models for adverse outcomes can provide important input to clinical decision-making. Surprisingly, one of the main challenges when using machine learning to build clinically useful risk models is the small amount of data available. Risk models need to be developed for specific patient populations, specific institutions, specific procedures, and specific outcomes. With each exclusion criterion, the amount of relevant training data decreases, until there is often an insufficient amount to learn an accurate model. This difficulty is compounded by the large class imbalance that is often present in medical applications.
Jen J. Gong, Thoralf M. Sundt, James D. Rawn, John V. Guttag
KDD2