Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Carl Shan

dblp:166/5272 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computing education › student performance prediction
at-risk student identification
0.212015
A Machine Learning Framework to Identify Students at Risk of Adverse Academic Outcomes · KDD 2015
Computing education
student performance prediction
0.212015
A Machine Learning Framework to Identify Students at Risk of Adverse Academic Outcomes · KDD 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

feature engineering · 0.2classification · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 A Machine Learning Framework to Identify Students at Risk of Adverse Academic Outcomes
abstract
Many school districts have developed successful intervention programs to help students graduate high school on time. However, identifying and prioritizing students who need those interventions the most remains challenging. This paper describes a machine learning framework to identify such students, discusses features that are useful for this task, applies several classification algorithms, and evaluates them using metrics important to school administrators. To help test this framework and make it practically useful, we partnered with two U.S. school districts with a combined enrollment of approximately 200,000 students. We together designed several evaluation metrics to assess the goodness of machine learning algorithms from an educator's perspective. This paper focuses on students at risk of not finishing high school on time, but our framework lays a strong foundation for future work on other adverse academic outcomes.
Himabindu Lakkaraju, Everaldo Aguiar, Carl Shan, Nasir Bhanpuri, Rayid Ghani, Kecia L. Addison
KDD3