VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Roy R. Lederman
dblp:166/6669
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-5080-4483ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
hamiltonian monte carlo |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Evaluating the Implicit Midpoint Integrator for Riemannian Hamiltonian Monte Carlo · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Evaluating the Implicit Midpoint Integrator for Riemannian Hamiltonian Monte Carlo · ICML 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical analysis
numerical integration |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Evaluating the Implicit Midpoint Integrator for Riemannian Hamiltonian Monte Carlo · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
implicit midpoint integrator · 1.0generalized leapfrog integrator · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Adaptation of the Independent Metropolis-Hastings Sampler with Normalizing Flow ProposalsabstractMarkov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods are a powerful tool for computation with complex probability distributions. However the performance of such methods is critically dependent on properly tuned parameters, most of which are difficult if not impossible to know a priori for a given target distribution. Adaptive MCMC methods aim to address this by allowing the parameters to be updated during sampling based on previous samples from the chain at the expense of requiring a new theoretical analysis to ensure convergence. In this work we extend the convergence theory of adaptive MCMC methods to a new class of methods built on a powerful class of parametric density estimators known as normalizing flows. In particular, we consider an independent Metropolis-Hastings sampler where the proposal distribution is represented by a normalizing flow whose parameters are updated using stochastic gradient descent. We explore the practical performance of this procedure on both synthetic settings and in the analysis of a physical field system, and compare it against both adaptive and non-adaptive MCMC methods. James A. Brofos, Marylou Gabrié, Marcus A. Brubaker, Roy R. Lederman |
AISTATS | 4 |
| 2021 | Evaluating the Implicit Midpoint Integrator for Riemannian Hamiltonian Monte CarloabstractRiemannian manifold Hamiltonian Monte Carlo is traditionally carried out using the generalized leapfrog integrator. However, this integrator is not the only choice and other integrators yielding valid Markov chain transition operators may be considered. In this work, we examine the implicit midpoint integrator as an alternative to the generalized leapfrog integrator. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of the implicit midpoint integrator for Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, its theoretical properties, and an empirical assessment of the critical attributes of such an integrator for Hamiltonian Monte Carlo: energy conservation, volume preservation, and reversibility. Empirically, we find that while leapfrog iterations are faster, the implicit midpoint integrator has better energy conservation, leading to higher acceptance rates, as well as better conservation of volume and better reversibility, arguably yielding a more accurate sampling procedure. James A. Brofos, Roy R. Lederman |
ICML | 2 |
| 2018 | Learning by coincidence: Siamese networks and common variable learning
Uri Shaham 0001, Roy R. Lederman |
Pattern Recognit. | 2 |
| 2015 | Alternating diffusion for common manifold learning with application to sleep stage assessmentabstractIn this paper, we address the problem of multimodal signal processing and present a manifold learning method to extract the common source of variability from multiple measurements. This method is based on alternating-diffusion and is particularly adapted to time series. We show that the common source of variability is extracted from multiple sensors as if it were the only source of variability, extracted by a standard manifold learning method from a single sensor, without the influence of the sensor-specific variables. In addition, we present application to sleep stage assessment. We demonstrate that, indeed, through alternating-diffusion, the sleep information hidden inside multimodal respiratory signals can be better captured compared to single-modal methods. Roy R. Lederman, Ronen Talmon, Hau-Tieng Wu, Yu-Lun Lo, Ronald R. Coifman |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 2013 | A random-permutations-based approach to fast read alignmentabstractBACKGROUND: Read alignment is a computational bottleneck in some sequencing projects. Most of the existing software packages for read alignment are based on two algorithmic approaches: prefix-trees and hash-tables. We propose a new approach to read alignment using random permutations of strings. RESULTS: We present a prototype implementation and experiments performed with simulated and real reads of human DNA. Our experiments indicate that this permutations-based prototype is several times faster than comparable programs for fast read alignment and that it aligns more reads correctly. CONCLUSIONS: This approach may lead to improved speed, sensitivity, and accuracy in read alignment. The algorithm can also be used for specialized alignment applications and it can be extended to other related problems, such as assembly.More information: http://alignment.commons.yale.edu. Roy R. Lederman |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |