Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Konstantinos Xirogiannopoulos

dblp:166/8362 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Graph data management · 81% Data models and query languages · 19%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph data management › graph extraction
graph extraction from relational data
0.522017
Extracting and Analyzing Hidden Graphs from Relational Databases · SIGMOD Conference 2017
GraphGen: Exploring Interesting Graphs in Relational Data · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015
Graph data management
graph compression
0.312017
Extracting and Analyzing Hidden Graphs from Relational Databases · SIGMOD Conference 2017
Graph data management
graph analytics
0.212015
GraphGen: Exploring Interesting Graphs in Relational Data · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015
Graph data management
graph extraction
0.212015
GraphGen: Exploring Interesting Graphs in Relational Data · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

declarative graph extraction · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Anti-Entropy Bandits for Geo-Replicated Consistency
abstract
Eventually consistent systems can be made more consistent by reducing the time until a write is fully replicated, thereby improving global update visibility. While gossip-based anti-entropy methods scale well, random selection of anti-entropy partners is less than efficient. Moreover, while eventual consistency may be consistent enough in a single data center, geographic replication increases visibility latency and leads to externally observable inconsistencies. In this paper, we explore an improvement to pairwise, bilateral anti-entropy; instead of uniform random selection, we introduce reinforcement learning mechanisms to assign selection probabilities to replicas most likely to have information. The result is more efficient replication, faster visibility, and stronger eventual consistency while maintaining high availability and partition tolerance.
Benjamin Bengfort, Konstantinos Xirogiannopoulos, Pete Keleher
ICDCS2
2017 Extracting and Analyzing Hidden Graphs from Relational Databases
abstract
Analyzing interconnection structures among underlying entities or objects in a dataset through the use of graph analytics can provide tremendous value in many application domains. However, graphs are not the primary representation choice for storing most data today, and in order to have access to these analyses, users are forced to manually extract data from their data stores, construct the requisite graphs, and then load them into some graph engine in order to execute their graph analysis task. Moreover, in many cases (especially when the graphs are dense), these graphs can be significantly larger than the initial input stored in the database, making it infeasible to construct or analyze such graphs in memory. In this paper we address both of these challenges by building a system that enables users to declaratively specify graph extraction tasks over a relational database schema and then execute graph algorithms on the extracted graphs. We propose a declarative domain specific language for this purpose, and pair it up with a novel condensed, in-memory representation that significantly reduces the memory footprint of these graphs, permitting analysis of larger-than-memory graphs. We present a general algorithm for creating such a condensed representation for a large class of graph extraction queries against arbitrary schemas. We observe that the condensed representation suffers from a duplication issue, that results in inaccuracies for most graph algorithms. We then present a suite of in-memory representations that handle this duplication in different ways and allow trading off the memory required and the computational cost for executing different graph algorithms. We also introduce several novel deduplication algorithms for removing this duplication in the graph, which are of independent interest for graph compression, and provide a comprehensive experimental evaluation over several real-world and synthetic datasets illustrating these trade-offs.
Konstantinos Xirogiannopoulos, Amol Deshpande
SIGMOD Conference1
2015 GraphGen: Exploring Interesting Graphs in Relational Data
abstract
Analyzing interconnection structures among the data through the use of graph algorithms and graph analytics has been shown to provide tremendous value in many application domains. However, graphs are not the primary choice for how most data is currently stored, and users who want to employ graph analytics are forced to extract data from their data stores, construct the requisite graphs, and then use a specialized engine to write and execute their graph analysis tasks. This cumbersome and costly process not only raises barriers in using graph analytics, but also makes it hard to explore and identify hidden or implicit graphs in the data. Here we demonstrate a system, called G raph G en , that enables users to declaratively specify graph extraction tasks over relational databases, visually explore the extracted graphs, and write and execute graph algorithms over them, either directly or using existing graph libraries like the widely used NetworkX Python library. We also demonstrate how unifying the extraction tasks and the graph algorithms enables significant optimizations that would not be possible otherwise.
Konstantinos Xirogiannopoulos, Udayan Khurana, Amol Deshpande
Proc. VLDB Endow.1