Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thomas W. Y. Burton

dblp:166/8672 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › genetic association study
genetic association study design
0.212015
ESPRESSO: taking into account assessment errors on outcome and exposures in power analysis for association studies · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology
power analysis
0.212015
ESPRESSO: taking into account assessment errors on outcome and exposures in power analysis for association studies · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biostatistics
sample size determination
0.212015
ESPRESSO: taking into account assessment errors on outcome and exposures in power analysis for association studies · Bioinform. 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation-based power analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 ESPRESSO: taking into account assessment errors on outcome and exposures in power analysis for association studies
abstract
MOTIVATION: Very large studies are required to provide sufficiently big sample sizes for adequately powered association analyses. This can be an expensive undertaking and it is important that an accurate sample size is identified. For more realistic sample size calculation and power analysis, the impact of unmeasured aetiological determinants and the quality of measurement of both outcome and explanatory variables should be taken into account. Conventional methods to analyse power use closed-form solutions that are not flexible enough to cater for all of these elements easily. They often result in a potentially substantial overestimation of the actual power. RESULTS: In this article, we describe the Estimating Sample-size and Power in R by Exploring Simulated Study Outcomes tool that allows assessment errors in power calculation under various biomedical scenarios to be incorporated. We also report a real world analysis where we used this tool to answer an important strategic question for an existing cohort. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software is available for online calculation and downloads at http://espresso-research.org. The code is freely available at https://github.com/ESPRESSO-research. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Amadou Gaye, Thomas W. Y. Burton, Paul R. Burton
Bioinform.2