Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Preet Jain

dblp:167/0070 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-1398-8411ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
multimodal retrieval
0.912025
Assessing Effective Token Length of Multimodal Models for Text-to-Image Retrieval · SIGIR 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.912025
Assessing Effective Token Length of Multimodal Models for Text-to-Image Retrieval · SIGIR 2025
Information retrieval › cross-modal retrieval
text-to-image retrieval
0.912025
Assessing Effective Token Length of Multimodal Models for Text-to-Image Retrieval · SIGIR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multimodal language model
0.312025
Assessing Effective Token Length of Multimodal Models for Text-to-Image Retrieval · SIGIR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

benchmark construction · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Assessing Effective Token Length of Multimodal Models for Text-to-Image Retrieval
abstract
Multimodal embedding models have been widely adopted in text-toimage retrieval, enabling direct comparison between text and image modalities.However, how well they handle long text is poorly understood.For instance, Long-CLIP found that OpenAI's CLIP model, despite having a 77-token input limit, maintains optimal performance for only 20 tokens-its effective token length.In this paper, we build on the Long-CLIP study, and extend the analysis to other widely used multimodal models and find their effective token length.Unlike Long-CLIP, we examine how domain-specific language influences changes in effective token length and explore its implications on different domains.Based on our findings, we create a comprehensive reference of various models' effective token length across different domains; offering deeper insights into the true limitations of multimodal models used in text-to-image retrieval.Finally, we introduce a systematic benchmark that determines the effective token length of any multimodal model using a given dataset.Our results show that the effective token length is consistently lower than the input token limit for all models, meaning that these models cannot utilize all the text that can be given to them.We also find that the effective token length varies by dataset, with domain-specific language influencing how much text a model can use before retrieval performance plateaus.Our code is available for reproducibility at https://github.com/aiforsec/EffectiveTokenLength-MModels
Le Nguyen, Preet Jain, Krutik Panchal, Md Tanvirul Alam, Nidhi Rastogi
SIGIR2