Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Minui Hong

dblp:167/1234 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 51% Trustworthy machine learning · 19% Deep learning architectures and training · 11%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
2.332025
FedMeNF: Privacy-Preserving Federated Meta-Learning for Neural Fields · ICCV 2025
FedAvP: Augment Local Data via Shared Policy in Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2024
Federated Learning via Meta-Variational Dropout · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
personalized federated learning
1.422024
FedAvP: Augment Local Data via Shared Policy in Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2024
Federated Learning via Meta-Variational Dropout · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › personalized federated learning
federated meta-learning
0.912025
FedMeNF: Privacy-Preserving Federated Meta-Learning for Neural Fields · ICCV 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
personalization
0.812024
FedAvP: Augment Local Data via Shared Policy in Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
bayesian meta-learning
0.712023
Federated Learning via Meta-Variational Dropout · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.512021
StyleMix: Separating Content and Style for Enhanced Data Augmentation · CVPR 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation
0.512021
StyleMix: Separating Content and Style for Enhanced Data Augmentation · CVPR 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data augmentation
mixup
0.512021
StyleMix: Separating Content and Style for Enhanced Data Augmentation · CVPR 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
robust learning
0.512021
StyleMix: Separating Content and Style for Enhanced Data Augmentation · CVPR 2021
Computer vision › 3D vision › implicit neural representation
neural field
0.312025
FedMeNF: Privacy-Preserving Federated Meta-Learning for Neural Fields · ICCV 2025
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving machine learning
0.312025
FedMeNF: Privacy-Preserving Federated Meta-Learning for Neural Fields · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
privacy
0.212024
FedAvP: Augment Local Data via Shared Policy in Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
privacy-preserving machine learning
0.212024
FedAvP: Augment Local Data via Shared Policy in Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
uncertainty calibration
0.212023
Federated Learning via Meta-Variational Dropout · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

meta-learning · 3.2privacy-preserving loss · 1.7policy search · 0.8first-order gradient approximation · 0.8variational dropout · 0.7hypernetwork · 0.7mixup · 0.5cutmix · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 FedMeNF: Privacy-Preserving Federated Meta-Learning for Neural Fields
abstract
Neural fields provide a memory-efficient representation of data, which can effectively handle diverse modalities and large-scale data. However, learning to map neural fields often requires large amounts of training data and computations, which can be limited to resource-constrained edge devices. One approach to tackle this limitation is to leverage Federated Meta-Learning (FML), but traditional FML approaches suffer from privacy leakage. To address these issues, we introduce a novel FML approach called FedMeNF. FedMeNF utilizes a new privacy-preserving loss function that regulates privacy leakage in the local meta-optimization. This enables the local meta-learner to optimize quickly and efficiently without retaining the client's private data. Our experiments demonstrate that FedMeNF achieves fast optimization speed and robust reconstruction performance, even with few-shot or non-IID data across diverse data modalities, while preserving client data privacy.
Junhyeog Yun, Minui Hong, Gunhee Kim
ICCV2
2024 FedAvP: Augment Local Data via Shared Policy in Federated Learning
abstract
Federated Learning (FL) allows multiple clients to collaboratively train models without directly sharing their private data. While various data augmentation techniques have been actively studied in the FL environment, most of these methods share input-level or feature-level data information over communication, posing potential privacy leakage. In response to this challenge, we introduce a federated data augmentation algorithm named FedAvP that shares only the augmentation policies, not the data-related information. For data security and efficient policy search, we interpret the policy loss as a meta update loss in standard FL algorithms and utilize the first-order gradient information to further enhance privacy and reduce communication costs. Moreover, we propose a meta-learning method to search for adaptive personalized policies tailored to heterogeneous clients. Our approach outperforms existing best performing augmentation policy search methods and federated data augmentation methods, in the benchmarks for heterogeneous FL.
Minui Hong, Junhyeog Yun, Insu Jeon, Gunhee Kim
NeurIPS1
2023 Federated Learning via Meta-Variational Dropout
abstract
Federated Learning (FL) aims to train a global inference model from remotely distributed clients, gaining popularity due to its benefit of improving data privacy. However, traditional FL often faces challenges in practical applications, including model overfitting and divergent local models due to limited and non-IID data among clients. To address these issues, we introduce a novel Bayesian meta-learning approach called meta-variational dropout (MetaVD). MetaVD learns to predict client-dependent dropout rates via a shared hypernetwork, enabling effective model personalization of FL algorithms in limited non-IID data settings. We also emphasize the posterior adaptation view of meta-learning and the posterior aggregation view of Bayesian FL via the conditional dropout posterior. We conducted extensive experiments on various sparse and non-IID FL datasets. MetaVD demonstrated excellent classification accuracy and uncertainty calibration performance, especially for out-of-distribution (OOD) clients. MetaVD compresses the local model parameters needed for each client, mitigating model overfitting and reducing communication costs. Code is available at https://github.com/insujeon/MetaVD.
Insu Jeon, Minui Hong, Junhyeog Yun, Gunhee Kim
NeurIPS2
2021 StyleMix: Separating Content and Style for Enhanced Data Augmentation
abstract
In spite of the great success of deep neural networks for many challenging classification tasks, the learned networks are vulnerable to overfitting and adversarial attacks. Recently, mixup based augmentation methods have been actively studied as one practical remedy for these drawbacks. However, these approaches do not distinguish between the content and style features of the image, but mix or cut-and-paste the images. We propose StyleMix and StyleCutMix as the first mixup method that separately manipulates the content and style information of input image pairs. By carefully mixing up the content and style of images, we can create more abundant and robust samples, which eventually enhance the generalization of model training. We also develop an automatic scheme to decide the degree of style mixing according to the pair’s class distance, to prevent messy mixed images from too differently styled pairs. Our experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and ImageNet datasets show that StyleMix achieves better or comparable performance to state of the art mixup methods and learns more robust classifiers to adversarial attacks.
Minui Hong, Gunhee Kim
CVPR1