Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alistair E. W. Johnson

dblp:167/1714 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8735-3014ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics › biomedical data science
cohort discovery
0.912025
ACES: Automatic Cohort Extraction System for Event-Stream Datasets · ICLR 2025
Medical and health informatics
electronic health records
0.912025
ACES: Automatic Cohort Extraction System for Event-Stream Datasets · ICLR 2025
Data integration and cleaning
data extraction
0.912025
ACES: Automatic Cohort Extraction System for Event-Stream Datasets · ICLR 2025
Medical and health informatics › clinical informatics
clinical data management
0.212016
Machine Learning and Decision Support in Critical Care · Proc. IEEE 2016
Medical and health informatics
clinical decision support
0.212016
Machine Learning and Decision Support in Critical Care · Proc. IEEE 2016
Medical and health informatics › clinical monitoring › patient monitoring
intensive care monitoring
0.212016
Machine Learning and Decision Support in Critical Care · Proc. IEEE 2016
Medical and health informatics
precision medicine
0.112016
Machine Learning and Decision Support in Critical Care · Proc. IEEE 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

domain-specific configuration language · 1.7machine learning · 0.2data preprocessing · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ACES: Automatic Cohort Extraction System for Event-Stream Datasets
abstract
Reproducibility remains a significant challenge in machine learning (ML) for healthcare. Datasets, model pipelines, and even task or cohort definitions are often private in this field, leading to a significant barrier in sharing, iterating, and understanding ML results on electronic health record (EHR) datasets. We address a significant part of this problem by introducing the Automatic Cohort Extraction System (ACES) for event-stream data. This library is designed to simultaneously simplify the development of tasks and cohorts for ML in healthcare and also enable their reproduction, both at an exact level for single datasets and at a conceptual level across datasets. To accomplish this, ACES provides: (1) a highly intuitive and expressive domain-specific configuration language for defining both dataset-specific concepts and dataset-agnostic inclusion or exclusion criteria, and (2) a pipeline to automatically extract patient records that meet these defined criteria from real-world data. ACES can be automatically applied to any dataset in either the Medical Event Data Standard (MEDS) or Event Stream GPT (ESGPT) formats, or to *any* dataset in which the necessary task-specific predicates can be extracted in an event-stream form. ACES has the potential to significantly lower the barrier to entry for defining ML tasks in representation learning, redefine the way researchers interact with EHR datasets, and significantly improve the state of reproducibility for ML studies using this modality. ACES is available at: https://github.com/justin13601/aces.
Justin Xu, Jack Gallifant, Alistair E. W. Johnson, Matthew B. A. McDermott
ICLR3
2023 MIMIC-IV on FHIR: converting a decade of in-patient data into an exchangeable, interoperable format
abstract
OBJECTIVE: Convert the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database into Health Level 7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR). Additionally, generate and publish an openly available demo of the resources, and create a FHIR Implementation Guide to support and clarify the usage of MIMIC-IV on FHIR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: FHIR profiles and terminology system of MIMIC-IV were modeled from the base FHIR R4 resources. Data and terminology were reorganized from the relational structure into FHIR according to the profiles. Resources generated were validated for conformance with the FHIR profiles. Finally, FHIR resources were published as newline delimited JSON files and the profiles were packaged into an implementation guide. RESULTS: The modeling of MIMIC-IV in FHIR resulted in 25 profiles, 2 extensions, 35 ValueSets, and 34 CodeSystems. An implementation guide encompassing the FHIR modeling can be accessed at mimic.mit.edu/fhir/mimic. The generated demo dataset contained 100 patients and over 915 000 resources. The full dataset contained 315 000 patients covering approximately 5 840 000 resources. The final datasets in NDJSON format are accessible on PhysioNet. DISCUSSION: Our work highlights the challenges and benefits of generating a real-world FHIR store. The challenges arise from terminology mapping and profiling modeling decisions. The benefits come from the extensively validated openly accessible data created as a result of the modeling work. CONCLUSION: The newly created MIMIC-IV on FHIR provides one of the first accessible deidentified critical care FHIR datasets. The extensive real-world data found in MIMIC-IV on FHIR will be invaluable for research and the development of healthcare applications.
Alex M. Bennett, Hannes Ulrich, Philip van Damme, Joshua Wiedekopf, Alistair E. W. Johnson
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.5
2018 The MIMIC Code Repository: enabling reproducibility in critical care research
abstract
Objective: Lack of reproducibility in medical studies is a barrier to the generation of a robust knowledge base to support clinical decision-making. In this paper we outline the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) Code Repository, a centralized code base for generating reproducible studies on an openly available critical care dataset. Materials and Methods: Code is provided to load the data into a relational structure, create extractions of the data, and reproduce entire analysis plans including research studies. Results: Concepts extracted include severity of illness scores, comorbid status, administrative definitions of sepsis, physiologic criteria for sepsis, organ failure scores, treatment administration, and more. Executable documents are used for tutorials and reproduce published studies end-to-end, providing a template for future researchers to replicate. The repository's issue tracker enables community discussion about the data and concepts, allowing users to collaboratively improve the resource. Discussion: The centralized repository provides a platform for users of the data to interact directly with the data generators, facilitating greater understanding of the data. It also provides a location for the community to collaborate on necessary concepts for research progress and share them with a larger audience. Consistent application of the same code for underlying concepts is a key step in ensuring that research studies on the MIMIC database are comparable and reproducible. Conclusion: By providing open source code alongside the freely accessible MIMIC-III database, we enable end-to-end reproducible analysis of electronic health records.
Alistair E. W. Johnson, David J. Stone, Leo A. Celi, Tom J. Pollard
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.1
2017 Real-time Mortality Prediction in the Intensive Care Unit
Alistair E. W. Johnson, Roger G. Mark
AMIA1
2016 Machine Learning and Decision Support in Critical Care
abstract
Clinical data management systems typically provide caregiver teams with useful information, derived from large, sometimes highly heterogeneous, data sources that are often changing dynamically. Over the last decade there has been a significant surge in interest in using these data sources, from simply re-using the standard clinical databases for event prediction or decision support, to including dynamic and patient-specific information into clinical monitoring and prediction problems. However, in most cases, commercial clinical databases have been designed to document clinical activity for reporting, liability and billing reasons, rather than for developing new algorithms. With increasing excitement surrounding "secondary use of medical records" and "Big Data" analytics, it is important to understand the limitations of current databases and what needs to change in order to enter an era of "precision medicine." This review article covers many of the issues involved in the collection and preprocessing of critical care data. The three challenges in critical care are considered: compartmentalization, corruption, and complexity. A range of applications addressing these issues are covered, including the modernization of static acuity scoring; on-line patient tracking; personalized prediction and risk assessment; artifact detection; state estimation; and incorporation of multimodal data sources such as genomic and free text data.
Alistair E. W. Johnson, Mohammad M. Ghassemi, Shamim Nemati, Katherine E. Niehaus, David A. Clifton, Gari D. Clifford
Proc. IEEE1